380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16953714)
41. Age differences in what is viewed and remembered in complex conjunction search.
Williams CC; Zacks RT; Henderson JM
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):946-66. PubMed ID: 18932061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Aging and the depth of binocular rivalry suppression.
Norman JF; Norman HF; Pattison K; Taylor MJ; Goforth KE
Psychol Aging; 2007 Sep; 22(3):625-31. PubMed ID: 17874959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Visuospatial attention is guided by both the symbolic value and the spatial proximity of selected arrows.
Pratt J; Radulescu P; Guo RM; Hommel B
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1321-4. PubMed ID: 20873941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Visual word recognition without central attention: evidence for greater automaticity with advancing age.
Lien MC; Allen PA; Ruthruff E; Grabbe J; McCann RS; Remington RW
Psychol Aging; 2006 Sep; 21(3):431-47. PubMed ID: 16953708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The influence of action on visual search: behavioral response toward stimuli modifies the selection process.
Buttaccio DR; Hahn S
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jul; 73(5):1453-66. PubMed ID: 21491163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Automatic and voluntary control of attention in young and older adults.
Juola JF; Koshino H; Warner CB; McMickell M; Peterson M
Am J Psychol; 2000; 113(2):159-78. PubMed ID: 10862340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Attentional capture by an unannounced color singleton depends on expectation discrepancy.
Horstmann G
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):1039-60. PubMed ID: 16262497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Orienting attention in visual working memory reduces interference from memory probes.
Makovski T; Sussman R; Jiang YV
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):369-80. PubMed ID: 18315412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Measuring the search image: expectation, detection, and recognition in pigeon visual search.
Blough DS
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2002 Oct; 28(4):397-405. PubMed ID: 12395497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Age-related changes in event-cued visual and auditory prospective memory proper.
Uttl B
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2006 Jun; 13(2):141-72. PubMed ID: 16807196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Top-down controlled, delayed selection in the attentional blink.
Nieuwenstein MR
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):973-85. PubMed ID: 16846292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Multisensory cues capture spatial attention regardless of perceptual load.
Santangelo V; Spence C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1311-21. PubMed ID: 18085945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Are spatial selection and identity extraction separable when attention is controlled endogenously?
Ghorashi S; Spalek TM; Enns JT; Di Lollo V
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1233-40. PubMed ID: 19633339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Can intertrial effects of features and dimensions be explained by a single theory?
Becker SI
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1417-40. PubMed ID: 19045983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Temporal limitations in the effective binding of attended target attributes in the mutual masking of visual objects.
Hommuk K; Bachmann T
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):648-60. PubMed ID: 19485683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Masking by object substitution: dissociation of masking and cuing effects.
Neill WT; Hutchison KA; Graves DF
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Jun; 28(3):682-94. PubMed ID: 12075896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Assessment of age-related changes in inhibition and binding using eye movement monitoring.
Ryan JD; Leung G; Turk-Browne NB; Hasher L
Psychol Aging; 2007 Jun; 22(2):239-50. PubMed ID: 17563180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. More than just finding color: strategy in global visual search is shaped by learned target probabilities.
Williams CC; Pollatsek A; Cave KR; Stroud MJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):688-99. PubMed ID: 19485685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Overriding age differences in attentional capture with top-down processing.
Whiting WL; Madden DJ; Babcock KJ
Psychol Aging; 2007 Jun; 22(2):223-32. PubMed ID: 17563178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Aging, memory and visual search.
Kramer AF; Boot WR; McCarley JS; Peterson MS; Colcombe A; Scialfa CT
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):288-304. PubMed ID: 16438921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
