These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16954028)
1. Ultrasound radiation force modulates ligand availability on targeted contrast agents. Borden MA; Sarantos MR; Stieger SM; Simon SI; Ferrara KW; Dayton PA Mol Imaging; 2006 Jul; 5(3):139-47. PubMed ID: 16954028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of surface architecture on in vivo ultrasound contrast persistence of targeted size-selected microbubbles. Chen CC; Sirsi SR; Homma S; Borden MA Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Mar; 38(3):492-503. PubMed ID: 22305060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vivo demonstration of cancer molecular imaging with ultrasound radiation force and buried-ligand microbubbles. Borden MA; Streeter JE; Sirsi SR; Dayton PA Mol Imaging; 2013 Sep; 12(6):357-63. PubMed ID: 23981781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Targeting of ultrasound contrast material. An in vitro feasibility study. Klibanov AL; Hughes MS; Marsh JN; Hall CS; Miller JG; Wible JH; Brandenburger GH Acta Radiol Suppl; 1997; 412():113-20. PubMed ID: 9240089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Unbinding of targeted ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles by secondary acoustic forces. Garbin V; Overvelde M; Dollet B; de Jong N; Lohse D; Versluis M Phys Med Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(19):6161-77. PubMed ID: 21878709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ligand conjugation to bimodal poly(ethylene glycol) brush layers on microbubbles. Chen CC; Borden MA Langmuir; 2010 Aug; 26(16):13183-94. PubMed ID: 20695557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimization of ultrasound contrast agents with computational models to improve selection of ligands and binding strength. Maul TM; Dudgeon DD; Beste MT; Hammer DA; Lazo JS; Villanueva FS; Wagner WR Biotechnol Bioeng; 2010 Dec; 107(5):854-64. PubMed ID: 20665479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]