These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16955537)

  • 1. Statistical distribution of the difference of two proportions.
    Nadarajah S; Kotz S
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(18):3518-21. PubMed ID: 16955537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A few remarks on 'Statistical distribution of the difference of two proportions' by Nadarajah and Kotz, Statistics in Medicine 2007; 26(18):3518-3523.
    Chen Y; Luo S
    Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(15):1913-5. PubMed ID: 21671250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of two sample proportions by the normal difference test. Distribution of chance differences between two sample proportions. Standard error of the difference between two sample proportions. Location of a sample difference on the distribution of chance differences.
    Bahn AK
    Woman Physician; 1970 Feb; 25(2):97-113. PubMed ID: 5463321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of 2 x 2 tables of frequencies: matching test to experimental design.
    Ludbrook J
    Int J Epidemiol; 2008 Dec; 37(6):1430-5. PubMed ID: 18710887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Response to 'A few remarks on Statistical distribution of the difference of two proportions' by Chen and Luo.
    Nadarajah S
    Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(15):1916. PubMed ID: 21671251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parametric robust inferences for correlated ordinal data.
    Tsou TS; Shen CW
    Stat Med; 2008 Aug; 27(18):3550-62. PubMed ID: 18407582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Proportional hazards regression for cancer studies.
    Ghosh D
    Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):141-8. PubMed ID: 17573863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Introduction to the use of regression models in epidemiology.
    Bender R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 471():179-95. PubMed ID: 19109780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistics in biomedical laboratory and clinical science: applications, issues and pitfalls.
    Ludbrook J
    Med Princ Pract; 2008; 17(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 18059094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Iterative generalized least squares for meta-analysis of survival data at multiple times.
    Dear KB
    Biometrics; 1994 Dec; 50(4):989-1002. PubMed ID: 7787011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Methods of exact nonparametric inference for non-typical distributions of experimental data].
    Moczko JA
    Przegl Lek; 2007; 64(10):874-8. PubMed ID: 18409330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A SAS macro for estimation of direct adjusted survival curves based on a stratified Cox regression model.
    Zhang X; Loberiza FR; Klein JP; Zhang MJ
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2007 Nov; 88(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 17850917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Discussion of research using propensity-score matching: comments on 'A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003' by Peter Austin, Statistics in Medicine.
    Hill J
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(12):2055-61; discussion 2066-9. PubMed ID: 18446836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Mizon-Richard encompassing test for the Cox and Aalen additive hazards models.
    Martinussen T; Aalen OO; Scheike TH
    Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):164-71. PubMed ID: 17608786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The essential role of balance tests in propensity-matched observational studies: comments on 'A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003' by Peter Austin, Statistics in Medicine.
    Hansen BB
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(12):2050-4; discussion 2066-9. PubMed ID: 18407561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detecting differences between contrast groups.
    Zhang S
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2008 Nov; 12(6):739-45. PubMed ID: 19000953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantile-function based null distribution in resampling based multiple testing.
    van der Laan MJ; Hubbard AE
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article14. PubMed ID: 17049025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Generating survival times to simulate Cox proportional hazards models.
    Bender R; Augustin T; Blettner M
    Stat Med; 2005 Jun; 24(11):1713-23. PubMed ID: 15724232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Developing practical recommendations for the use of propensity scores: discussion of 'A critical appraisal of propensity score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003' by Peter Austin, Statistics in Medicine.
    Stuart EA
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(12):2062-5; discussion 2066-9. PubMed ID: 18286673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Frequent mistakes in the statistical inference of biomedical data.
    Martínez-Sellés M; Prieto L; Herranz I
    Ital Heart J; 2005 Feb; 6(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 15819501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.