344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16955606)
1. Primary stability of a conical implant and a hybrid, cylindric screw-type implant in vitro.
Sakoh J; Wahlmann U; Stender E; Nat R; Al-Nawas B; Wagner W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(4):560-6. PubMed ID: 16955606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis of dental implant systems in an animal model with loaded implants.
Al-Nawas B; Wagner W; Grötz KA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):726-32. PubMed ID: 17066633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differences in implant stability associated with various methods of preparation of the implant bed: an in vitro study.
Ahn SJ; Leesungbok R; Lee SW; Heo YK; Kang KL
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jun; 107(6):366-72. PubMed ID: 22633592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with different cortical thickness: a laboratory study.
Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Feb; 21(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 20070754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of superficial roughness and design on the primary stability of dental implants.
Dos Santos MV; Elias CN; Cavalcanti Lima JH
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Sep; 13(3):215-23. PubMed ID: 19744197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Primary Stability of a Hybrid Implant Compared with Tapered and Cylindrical Implants in an Ex Vivo Model.
Toyoshima T; Tanaka H; Ayukawa Y; Howashi M; Masuzaki T; Kiyosue T; Koyano K; Nakamura S
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 17(5):950-6. PubMed ID: 24506148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Primary stability, insertion torque and bone density of cylindric implant ad modum Branemark: is there a relationship? An in vitro study.
Trisi P; De Benedittis S; Perfetti G; Berardi D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 May; 22(5):567-70. PubMed ID: 21087320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adapted preparation technique for screw-type implants: explorative in vitro pilot study in a porcine bone model.
Beer A; Gahleitner A; Holm A; Birkfellner W; Homolka P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Feb; 18(1):103-7. PubMed ID: 17224030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of surgical technique, implant shape and diameter on the primary stability in cancellous bone.
Bilhan H; Geckili O; Mumcu E; Bozdag E; Sünbüloğlu E; Kutay O
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Dec; 37(12):900-7. PubMed ID: 20529176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Determination of primary stability: a comparison of the surgeon's perception and objective measurements.
Degidi M; Daprile G; Piattelli A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):558-61. PubMed ID: 20556255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of defect depth on resonance frequency analysis and insertion torque values for implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: a human cadaver study.
Turkyilmaz I; Sennerby L; Yilmaz B; Bilecenoglu B; Ozbek EN
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Mar; 11(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18384400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Undersized implant site preparation to enhance primary implant stability in poor bone density: a prospective clinical study.
Alghamdi H; Anand PS; Anil S
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 69(12):e506-12. PubMed ID: 22117707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mechanical stability of immediately loaded implants with various surfaces and designs: a pilot study in dogs.
Neugebauer J; Weinländer M; Lekovic V; von Berg KH; Zoeller JE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1083-92. PubMed ID: 20162113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of the surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with a density equivalent to maxillary bone: a laboratory study.
Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Apr; 20(4):327-32. PubMed ID: 19298286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the primary stabilities of conical and cylindrical endosseous dental implants: an in-vitro study.
Aleo E; Varvara G; Scarano A; Sinjari B; Murmura G
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2012; 26(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 22475100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A correlation between bone (B), insertion torque (IT), and implant stability (S): BITS score.
Herekar M; Sethi M; Ahmad T; Fernandes AS; Patil V; Kulkarni H
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):805-10. PubMed ID: 24726588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of primary and secondary stability of titanium implants using different surgical techniques.
Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Walboomers XF; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Apr; 25(4):487-92. PubMed ID: 23638908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Primary stability of turned and acid-etched screw-type implants: a removal torque and histomorphometric study in rabbits.
Fernandes Ede L; Unikowski IL; Teixeira ER; da Costa NP; Shinkai RS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 18271369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Primary Stability of Cylindrical and Conical Dental Implants in Relation to Insertion Torque-A Comparative Ex Vivo Evaluation.
Staedt H; Palarie V; Staedt A; Wolf JM; Lehmann KM; Ottl P; Kämmerer PW
Implant Dent; 2017 Apr; 26(2):250-255. PubMed ID: 27922455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Primary stability of a hybrid self-tapping implant compared to a cylindrical non-self-tapping implant with respect to drilling protocols in an ex vivo model.
Toyoshima T; Wagner W; Klein MO; Stender E; Wieland M; Al-Nawas B
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Mar; 13(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 19681929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
