These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16955611)

  • 1. Marginal integrity of direct and indirect castings for implant abutments.
    Ganz SD; Desai N; Weiner S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(4):593-9. PubMed ID: 16955611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dimensional accuracy analysis of implant framework castings from 2 casting systems.
    Chang TL; Maruyama C; White SN; Son S; Caputo AA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(5):720-5. PubMed ID: 16274145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marginal fit of cemented and screw-retained crowns incorporated on the Straumann (ITI) Dental Implant System: an in vitro study.
    Tosches NA; Brägger U; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jan; 20(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 19126111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal accuracy of three implant-ceramic abutment configurations.
    Baldassarri M; Hjerppe J; Romeo D; Fickl S; Thompson VP; Stappert CF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):537-43. PubMed ID: 22616046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-dimensional accuracy of implant and abutment level impression techniques: effect on marginal discrepancy.
    Alikhasi M; Siadat H; Monzavi A; Momen-Heravi F
    J Oral Implantol; 2011 Dec; 37(6):649-57. PubMed ID: 20594060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marginal fit of nickel-chromium copings before and after internal adjustments with duplicated stone dies and disclosing agent.
    Ushiwata O; de Moraes JV; Bottino MA; da Silva EG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jun; 83(6):634-43. PubMed ID: 10842130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of abutment wall height, platform size, and screw access channel filling method on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
    Emms M; Tredwin CJ; Setchell DJ; Moles DR
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 17244301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of engaging the screw access channel of an implant abutment with a cement-retained restoration.
    Naik S; Tredwin CJ; Nesbit M; Setchell DJ; Moles DR
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 19141047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal adaptation of all-ceramic crowns on implant abutments.
    Att W; Hoischen T; Gerds T; Strub JR
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Dec; 10(4):218-25. PubMed ID: 18241217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Marginal adaptation of three different zirconium dioxide three-unit fixed dental prostheses.
    Att W; Komine F; Gerds T; Strub JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):239-47. PubMed ID: 19328277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection.
    Wenz HJ; Hertrampf K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18416411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of surface conditioning on the retentiveness of titanium crowns over short implant abutments.
    Sadig WM; Al Harbi MW
    Implant Dent; 2007 Dec; 16(4):387-96. PubMed ID: 18091167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of abutment rotation and angulation on marginal fit: theoretical considerations.
    Semper W; Kraft S; Mehrhof J; Nelson K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):752-8. PubMed ID: 20657870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measurement of the rotational misfit and implant-abutment gap of all-ceramic abutments.
    Garine WN; Funkenbusch PD; Ercoli C; Wodenscheck J; Murphy WC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):928-38. PubMed ID: 18271374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal accuracy of combined tooth-implant-supported fixed dental prostheses after in vitro stress simulation.
    Boeckler AF; Morton D; Kraemer S; Geiss-Gerstdorfer J; Setz JM
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1261-9. PubMed ID: 19040441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scanning electron microscope evaluation of vertical and horizontal discrepancy in cast copings for single-tooth implant-supported prostheses.
    Siadat H; Alikhasi M; Mirfazaelian A; Zade MM
    Implant Dent; 2008 Sep; 17(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 18784530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A classification system to measure the implant-abutment microgap.
    Kano SC; Binon PP; Curtis DA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 18271368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retention forces and seating discrepancies of implant-retained castings after cementation.
    Wolfart M; Wolfart S; Kern M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(4):519-25. PubMed ID: 16955601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of the crown preparation margin and die type on the marginal accuracy of fiber-reinforced composite crowns.
    Ayad MF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):9-16. PubMed ID: 18264520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.