220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16956333)
1. Cost-effectiveness analysis of open colposuspension versus laparoscopic colposuspension in the treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence.
Dumville JC; Manca A; Kitchener HC; Smith AR; Nelson L; Torgerson DJ;
BJOG; 2006 Sep; 113(9):1014-22. PubMed ID: 16956333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A cost-utility analysis of tension-free vaginal tape versus colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence.
Manca A; Sculpher MJ; Ward K; Hilton P
BJOG; 2003 Mar; 110(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 12628263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension--results of a prospective randomised controlled trial.
Kitchener HC; Dunn G; Lawton V; Reid F; Nelson L; Smith AR;
BJOG; 2006 Sep; 113(9):1007-13. PubMed ID: 16956332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic versus open Burch colposuspension: a randomised controlled trial.
Carey MP; Goh JT; Rosamilia A; Cornish A; Gordon I; Hawthorne G; Maher CF; Dwyer PL; Moran P; Gilmour DT
BJOG; 2006 Sep; 113(9):999-1006. PubMed ID: 16956331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A cost-effectiveness analysis of tension-free vaginal tape versus laparoscopic mesh colposuspension for primary female stress incontinence.
Valpas A; Rissanen P; Kujansuu E; Nilsson CG
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(12):1485-90. PubMed ID: 17260226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women: a short version Cochrane review.
Lapitan MC; Cody JD; Grant A
Neurourol Urodyn; 2009; 28(6):472-80. PubMed ID: 19591206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomised trial comparing open Burch colposuspension using sutures with laparoscopic colposuspension using mesh and staples in women with stress urinary incontinence.
Ankardal M; Ekerydh A; Crafoord K; Milsom I; Stjerndahl JH; Engh ME
BJOG; 2004 Sep; 111(9):974-81. PubMed ID: 15327613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-utility analysis of open versus laparoscopic groin hernia repair: results from a multicentre randomized clinical trial.
Medical Research Council Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group.
Br J Surg; 2001 May; 88(5):653-61. PubMed ID: 11350435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Shoulder acute pain in primary health care: is retraining GPs effective? The SAPPHIRE randomized trial: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
McKenna C; Bojke L; Manca A; Adebajo A; Dickson J; Helliwell P; Morton V; Russell I; Torgerson D; Watson J
Rheumatology (Oxford); 2009 May; 48(5):558-63. PubMed ID: 19258378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is Burch colposuspension ever cost-effective compared with tension-free vaginal tape for stress incontinence?
Wu JM; Visco AG; Weidner AC; Myers ER
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jul; 197(1):62.e1-5. PubMed ID: 17618760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tension-free vaginal tape and laparoscopic mesh colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence.
Valpas A; Kivelä A; Penttinen J; Kujansuu E; Haarala M; Nilsson CG
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 104(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 15228999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open mesh hernia operation: results of a Department of Veterans Affairs randomized clinical trial.
Hynes DM; Stroupe KT; Luo P; Giobbie-Hurder A; Reda D; Kraft M; Itani K; Fitzgibbons R; Jonasson O; Neumayer L
J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Oct; 203(4):447-57. PubMed ID: 17000387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of health care costs for open Burch colposuspension, laparoscopic colposuspension and tension-free vaginal tape in the treatment of female urinary incontinence.
Ankardal M; Järbrink K; Milsom I; Heiwall B; Lausten-Thomsen N; Ellström-Engh M
Neurourol Urodyn; 2007; 26(6):761-6. PubMed ID: 17610271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Laparoscopic transperitoneal colposuspension modo Burch in stress incontinence in women. A comparison of early and late results].
Huk J; Fryczkowski M
Przegl Lek; 2002; 59(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 12152257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative outcome analysis of laparoscopic colposuspension, abdominal colposuspension and vaginal needle suspension for female urinary incontinence.
Das S
J Urol; 1998 Aug; 160(2):368-71. PubMed ID: 9679879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension for urodynamic stress incontinence.
Tan E; Tekkis PP; Cornish J; Teoh TG; Darzi AW; Khullar V
Neurourol Urodyn; 2007; 26(2):158-69. PubMed ID: 17252603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension: which one should we choose?
Reid F; Smith AR
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 19(4):345-9. PubMed ID: 17625416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of laparoscopic and open retropubic urethropexy for treatment of stress urinary incontinence.
Polascik TJ; Moore RG; Rosenberg MT; Kavoussi LR
Urology; 1995 Apr; 45(4):647-52. PubMed ID: 7716846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomized trial of two physiotherapy interventions for primary care back and neck pain patients: cost effectiveness analysis.
Manca A; Dumville JC; Torgerson DJ; Klaber Moffett JA; Mooney MP; Jackson DA; Eaton S
Rheumatology (Oxford); 2007 Sep; 46(9):1495-501. PubMed ID: 17711873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Falls and health status in elderly women following first eye cataract surgery: an economic evaluation conducted alongside a randomised controlled trial.
Sach TH; Foss AJ; Gregson RM; Zaman A; Osborn F; Masud T; Harwood RH
Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Dec; 91(12):1675-9. PubMed ID: 17585002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
