These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16957496)

  • 1. Cortical electric response audiometry hearing threshold estimation: accuracy, speed, and the effects of stimulus presentation features.
    Lightfoot G; Kennedy V
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):443-56. PubMed ID: 16957496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparison of thresholds acquired with SVR and PTA in normal hearing subjects].
    Liu H; Zhu GY; Yang XP; Zhou XR; Wan L; Fan LH
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Feb; 26(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 20232737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The relation between the pure-tone audiogram and the click auditory brainstem response threshold in cochlear hearing loss.
    van der Drift JF; Brocaar MP; van Zanten GA
    Audiology; 1987; 26(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 3593096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
    Mills DM; Feeney MP; Gates GA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lin YH; Ho HC; Wu HP
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Apr; 36(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 18620826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of 40 Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) and cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) thresholds in awake adult subjects.
    Tomlin D; Rance G; Graydon K; Tsialios I
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Oct; 45(10):580-8. PubMed ID: 17062499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.
    Hamdan AL; Abouchacra KS; Zeki Al Hazzouri AG; Zaytoun G
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):360-77. PubMed ID: 18382377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained using pure-tone behavioral audiometry, the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT) and cortical evoked response audiometry.
    Wong LL; Cheung C; Wong EC
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 128(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 18568500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The progress in the study on auditory evoked potentials].
    Chen F; Yang XP; Fan LH
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Jun; 27(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 21899015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory cortical responses evoked by pure tones in healthy and sensorineural hearing loss subjects: functional MRI and magnetoencephalography.
    Zhang YT; Geng ZJ; Zhang Q; Li W; Zhang J
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2006 Sep; 119(18):1548-54. PubMed ID: 16996009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
    Reavis KM; Phillips DS; Fausti SA; Gordon JS; Helt WJ; Wilmington D; Bratt GW; Konrad-Martin D
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simultaneous acquisition of 80 Hz ASSRs and ABRs from quasi ASSRs for threshold estimation.
    Lachowska M; Bohórquez J; Ozdamar O
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):660-71. PubMed ID: 22568993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Application of slow vertex response in auditory threshold prediction for subjects with hearing loss].
    Liu H; Zhu GY; Fan LH; Zhou XR; Liu XW; Yang XP
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Jun; 27(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 21899007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validity and accuracy of electric response audiometry using the auditory steady-state response: evaluation in an empirical design.
    Kaf WA; Durrant JD; Sabo DL; Robert Boston J; Taubman LB; Kovacyk K
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Apr; 45(4):211-23. PubMed ID: 16684702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of very slow rates of stimulus presentation on event-related potential estimates of hearing threshold.
    Muller-Gass A; Marcoux A; Jamshidi P; Campbell K
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Jan; 47(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 18196485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prediction of hearing thresholds: comparison of cortical evoked response audiometry and auditory steady state response audiometry techniques.
    Yeung KN; Wong LL
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Jan; 46(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 17365051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Agreement between auditory threshold calculated from cortical evoked response audiometry and tone audiometry in occupational hearing loss].
    Janisch R; Jerábek J
    Cesk Otolaryngol; 1990 Aug; 39(4):234-41. PubMed ID: 2289246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of hearing loss and spectral shaping on identification and neural response patterns of stop-consonant stimuli in young adults.
    Harkrider AW; Plyler PN; Hedrick MS
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 19125025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simultaneously measured behavioral and electrophysiological hearing thresholds in a bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus).
    Schlundt CE; Dear RL; Green L; Houser DS; Finneran JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):615-22. PubMed ID: 17614518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.