BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

3220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16957500)

  • 1. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Communication abilities of children with aided residual hearing: comparison with cochlear implant users.
    Eisenberg LS; Kirk KI; Martinez AS; Ying EA; Miyamoto RT
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):563-9. PubMed ID: 15148177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparison of the residual hearing on the profound hearing-impaired children with the hearing aids and cochlear implants].
    Luo R; Wang X; Sun C; Lan J
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Dec; 24(24):1123-5. PubMed ID: 21395181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bilateral cochlear implantation for hearing-impaired children: criterion of candidacy derived from an observational study.
    Lovett RE; Vickers DA; Summerfield AQ
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 25170781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Aspects of auditory speech perception in cochlear implant and hearing aid managed children].
    Junge FM; Dahm MC; Braun O
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1997; 147(10):255-8. PubMed ID: 9324868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of promontory and cochlear implants within a single subject.
    Edgerton BJ; House WF; Doyle KJ
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1982; 91(2 Pt 3):100-3. PubMed ID: 6805388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech perception skills of children with multichannel cochlear implants or hearing aids.
    Miyamoto RT; Kirk KI; Todd SL; Robbins AM; Osberger MJ
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():334-7. PubMed ID: 7668695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors associated with development of speech perception skills in children implanted by age five.
    Geers A; Brenner C; Davidson L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1 Suppl):24S-35S. PubMed ID: 12612478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fitting range of the BAHA Cordelle.
    Bosman AJ; Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Aug; 45(8):429-37. PubMed ID: 17005485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems.
    Firszt JB; Holden LK; Skinner MW; Tobey EA; Peterson A; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Wackym PA
    Ear Hear; 2004 Aug; 25(4):375-87. PubMed ID: 15292777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech and language development in a population of Swedish hearing-impaired pre-school children, a cross-sectional study.
    Borg E; Edquist G; Reinholdson AC; Risberg A; McAllister B
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Jul; 71(7):1061-77. PubMed ID: 17512613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
    Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech perception in children with auditory neuropathy/dyssynchrony managed with either hearing AIDS or cochlear implants.
    Rance G; Barker EJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):179-82. PubMed ID: 18165792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Audibility and speech perception of children using wide dynamic range compression hearing AIDS.
    Davidson LS; Skinner MW
    Am J Audiol; 2006 Dec; 15(2):141-53. PubMed ID: 17182879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech intelligibility of implanted children.
    Robbins AM; Kirk KI; Osberger MJ; Ertmer D
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():399-401. PubMed ID: 7668721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 161.