These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16957504)

  • 1. Experimental evaluation of different methods of limiting the maximum output of hearing aids.
    Savage I; Dillon H; Byrne D; Bächler H
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):550-62. PubMed ID: 16957504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The design and evaluation of a hearing aid with trainable amplification parameters.
    Zakis JA; Dillon H; McDermott HJ
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):812-30. PubMed ID: 17982368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The subjective evaluation of the expansion time constant in single-channel wide dynamic range compression hearing instruments.
    Plyler PN; Trine TD; Blair Hill A
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 45(6):331-6. PubMed ID: 16777779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ranking hearing aid input-output functions for understanding low-, conversational-, and high-level speech in multitalker babble.
    Chung K; Killion MC; Christensen LA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):304-22. PubMed ID: 17463231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Client preferences for compression threshold in single-channel wide dynamic range compression hearing aids.
    Barker C; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 1999 Apr; 20(2):127-39. PubMed ID: 10229514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fitting low ratio compression to people with severe and profound hearing losses.
    Barker C; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2001 Apr; 22(2):130-41. PubMed ID: 11324842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Music preferences with hearing aids: effects of signal properties, compression settings, and listener characteristics.
    Croghan NB; Arehart KH; Kates JM
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(5):e170-84. PubMed ID: 25010635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of sound quality and clarity with asymmetrical peak clipping and output limiting compression.
    Hawkins DB; Naidoo SV
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 Jul; 4(4):221-8. PubMed ID: 8369539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the desired sensation level [input/output] algorithm for adults with hearing loss: the acceptable range for amplified conversational speech.
    Jenstad LM; Bagatto MP; Seewald RC; Scollie SD; Cornelisse LE; Scicluna R
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):793-811. PubMed ID: 17982367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The National Acoustic Laboratories' procedure for selecting the saturation sound pressure level of hearing aids: experimental validation.
    Storey L; Dillon H; Yeend I; Wigney D
    Ear Hear; 1998 Aug; 19(4):267-79. PubMed ID: 9728722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Latent demand for the bone-anchored hearing aid: the Lippy Group experience.
    Burkey JM; Berenholz LP; Lippy WH;
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):648-52. PubMed ID: 16868512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient preferences for direct hearing aid provision by a private dispenser. A discrete choice experiment.
    Grutters JP; Joore MA; Kessels AG; Davis AC; Anteunis LJ
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):557-64. PubMed ID: 18469716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phonological mismatch makes aided speech recognition in noise cognitively taxing.
    Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):879-92. PubMed ID: 17982373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Longitudinal benefit from and satisfaction with the Baha system for patients with acquired unilateral sensorineural hearing loss.
    Newman CW; Sandridge SA; Wodzisz LM
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Dec; 29(8):1123-31. PubMed ID: 19034196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Subjective and objective effects of fast and slow compression on the perception of reverberant speech in listeners with hearing loss.
    Shi LF; Doherty KA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1328-40. PubMed ID: 18664685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Sensible utilization of modern hearing aid technique. II: Multiple channel compression].
    Steffens T
    HNO; 1996 May; 44(5):273-85. PubMed ID: 8707635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurement of individual loudness functions by trisection of loudness ranges.
    Villchur E; Killion MC
    Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):693-703. PubMed ID: 18769270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Client-based adjustments of hearing aid gain: the effect of different control configurations.
    Dreschler WA; Keidser G; Convery E; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):214-27. PubMed ID: 18490863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term usage of modern signal processing by listeners with severe or profound hearing loss: a retrospective survey.
    Keidser G; Hartley D; Carter L
    Am J Audiol; 2008 Dec; 17(2):136-46. PubMed ID: 18840704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measurement of hearing aid outcome in the elderly: comparison between young and old elderly.
    Chang WH; Tseng HC; Chao TK; Hsu CJ; Liu TC
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Jun; 138(6):730-4. PubMed ID: 18503844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.