These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
709 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16957794)
1. A review of polymerization shrinkage stress: current techniques for posterior direct resin restorations. Giachetti L; Scaminaci Russo D; Bambi C; Grandini R J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Sep; 7(4):79-88. PubMed ID: 16957794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Managing the polymerization shrinkage of resin composite restorations: a review. Alomari Q; Ajlouni R; Omar R SADJ; 2007 Feb; 62(1):12, 14, 16 passim. PubMed ID: 17427725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of micro-tensile bond strengths of composite materials in comparison to their polymerization shrinkage. Ilie N; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R Dent Mater; 2006 Jul; 22(7):593-601. PubMed ID: 16289723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations. Sarrett DC Dent Mater; 2005 Jan; 21(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 15680997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Resin pins: a novel composite resin concept for treatment of posterior teeth--technical presentation. de Almeida BC; de Almeida RS Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 20(8):507-11; quiz 512. PubMed ID: 18990903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Handling of mechanical stresses in composite restorations. Davidson CL; Davidson-Kaban SS Dent Update; 1998 Sep; 25(7):274-9. PubMed ID: 10478021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A rational use of dental materials in posterior direct resin restorations in order to control polymerization shrinkage stress. Giachetti L; Bertini F; Bambi C; Scaminaci Russo D Minerva Stomatol; 2007 Mar; 56(3):129-38. PubMed ID: 17327817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Conversion-dependent shrinkage stress and strain in dental resins and composites. Stansbury JW; Trujillo-Lemon M; Lu H; Ding X; Lin Y; Ge J Dent Mater; 2005 Jan; 21(1):56-67. PubMed ID: 15681003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of material properties on stresses at the restoration-dentin interface of composite restorations during polymerization. Kahler B; Kotousov A; Borkowski K Dent Mater; 2006 Oct; 22(10):942-7. PubMed ID: 16360849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Polymerization contraction stresses of resin-based composite restorations within beveled cavity preparations of Class I restorations. Kinomoto Y; Torii M; Takeshige F; Ebisu S Am J Dent; 2003 Apr; 16(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 12797575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations. Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A Odontostomatol Trop; 2008 Dec; 31(124):27-34. PubMed ID: 19441264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Developing a more complete understanding of stresses produced in dental composites during polymerization. Ferracane JL Dent Mater; 2005 Jan; 21(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 15681000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Black or white--Which choice for the molars? Part 2. Which does one choose for the restoration of posterior teeth: amalgam or composite?]. De Moor R; Delmé K Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2008; 63(4):135-46. PubMed ID: 19227687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamics of composite polymerization mediates the development of cuspal strain. Bouillaguet S; Gamba J; Forchelet J; Krejci I; Wataha JC Dent Mater; 2006 Oct; 22(10):896-902. PubMed ID: 16364426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]