182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16958046)
1. In vivo biostability of polyether polyurethanes with fluoropolymer and polyethylene oxide surface modifying endgroups; resistance to metal ion oxidation.
Ward R; Anderson J; McVenes R; Stokes K
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2007 Jan; 80(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 16958046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vivo biostability of polysiloxane polyether polyurethanes: resistance to metal ion oxidation.
Ward B; Anderson J; Ebert M; McVenes R; Stokes K
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2006 May; 77(2):380-9. PubMed ID: 16425243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vivo biostability of shore 55D polyether polyurethanes with and without fluoropolymer surface modifying endgroups.
Ward R; Anderson J; McVenes R; Stokes K
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2006 Dec; 79(4):836-45. PubMed ID: 16886224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vivo biostability of polyether polyurethanes with fluoropolymer surface modifying endgroups: resistance to biologic oxidation and stress cracking.
Ward B; Anderson J; McVenes R; Stokes K
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2006 Dec; 79(4):827-35. PubMed ID: 16886223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vivo biostability of polyether polyurethanes with polyethylene oxide surface-modifying end groups; resistance to biologic oxidation and stress cracking.
Ebert M; Ward B; Anderson J; McVenes R; Stokes K
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2005 Oct; 75(1):175-84. PubMed ID: 16041797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vivo biostability of polysiloxane polyether polyurethanes: resistance to biologic oxidation and stress cracking.
Ward R; Anderson J; McVenes R; Stokes K
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2006 Jun; 77(3):580-9. PubMed ID: 16506175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term in vivo biostability of poly(dimethylsiloxane)/poly(hexamethylene oxide) mixed macrodiol-based polyurethane elastomers.
Simmons A; Hyvarinen J; Odell RA; Martin DJ; Gunatillake PA; Noble KR; Poole-Warren LA
Biomaterials; 2004 Sep; 25(20):4887-900. PubMed ID: 15109849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long term in vitro biostability of segmented polyisobutylene-based thermoplastic polyurethanes.
Cozzens D; Ojha U; Kulkarni P; Faust R; Desai S
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Dec; 95(3):774-82. PubMed ID: 20725977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis and evaluation of a biomedical polycarbonate urethane tested in an in vitro study and an ovine arthroplasty model. Part II: in vivo investigation.
Khan I; Smith N; Jones E; Finch DS; Cameron RE
Biomaterials; 2005 Feb; 26(6):633-43. PubMed ID: 15282141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis and evaluation of a biomedical polycarbonate urethane tested in an in vitro study and an ovine arthroplasty model. Part I: materials selection and evaluation.
Khan I; Smith N; Jones E; Finch DS; Cameron RE
Biomaterials; 2005 Feb; 26(6):621-31. PubMed ID: 15282140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The in vivo auto-oxidation of polyether polyurethane by metal ions.
Stokes K; Urbanski P; Upton J
J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 1990; 1(3):207-30. PubMed ID: 2275922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Polyurethane elastomer biostability.
Stokes K; McVenes R; Anderson JM
J Biomater Appl; 1995 Apr; 9(4):321-54. PubMed ID: 9309503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of soft-segment chemistry on polyurethane biostability during in vitro fatigue loading.
Wiggins MJ; MacEwan M; Anderson JM; Hiltner A
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Mar; 68(4):668-83. PubMed ID: 14986322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Oxidative mechanisms of poly(carbonate urethane) and poly(ether urethane) biodegradation: in vivo and in vitro correlations.
Christenson EM; Anderson JM; Hiltner A
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Aug; 70(2):245-55. PubMed ID: 15227669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vivo biocompatibility of sulfonated PEO-grafted polyurethanes for polymer heart valve and vascular graft.
Han DK; Park K; Park KD; Ahn KD; Kim YH
Artif Organs; 2006 Dec; 30(12):955-9. PubMed ID: 17181836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Autooxidative degradation of implanted polyether polyurethane devices.
Stokes K; Coury A; Urbanski P
J Biomater Appl; 1987 Apr; 1(4):411-48. PubMed ID: 3506953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biological stability of polyurethane modified with covalent attachment of di-tert-butyl-phenol.
Stachelek SJ; Alferiev I; Fulmer J; Ischiropoulos H; Levy RJ
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2007 Sep; 82(4):1004-11. PubMed ID: 17370325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nonfouling biomaterials based on polyethylene oxide-containing amphiphilic triblock copolymers as surface modifying additives: solid state structure of PEO-copolymer/polyurethane blends.
Tan J; Brash JL
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2008 Jun; 85(4):862-72. PubMed ID: 17896775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro oxidation of high polydimethylsiloxane content biomedical polyurethanes: correlation with the microstructure.
Hernandez R; Weksler J; Padsalgikar A; Runt J
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2008 Nov; 87(2):546-56. PubMed ID: 18186070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vivo biostability and calcification-resistance of surface-modified PU-PEO-SO3.
Han DK; Park KD; Jeong SY; Kim YH; Kim UY; Min BG
J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 Aug; 27(8):1063-73. PubMed ID: 8408119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
