BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16958057)

  • 1. Imaging artifacts at 3.0T.
    Bernstein MA; Huston J; Ward HA
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Oct; 24(4):735-46. PubMed ID: 16958057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 3.0 Tesla imaging of the musculoskeletal system.
    Kuo R; Panchal M; Tanenbaum L; Crues JV
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Feb; 25(2):245-61. PubMed ID: 17260407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Magnetic resonance imaging of the cranial nerves in the posterior fossa: a comparative study of t2-weighted spin-echo sequences at 1.5 and 3.0 tesla.
    Fischbach F; Müller M; Bruhn H
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Apr; 49(3):358-63. PubMed ID: 18365827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Artifacts in 3-T MRI: physical background and reduction strategies.
    Dietrich O; Reiser MF; Schoenberg SO
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jan; 65(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 18162353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Progress of studies for reduction of ghost artifact in magnetic resonance imaging].
    Chen C; Tao H; Wang S; Luo L
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Apr; 24(2):457-9. PubMed ID: 17591281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Abdominal MR imaging at 3T.
    Merkle EM; Dale BM; Paulson EK
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2006 Feb; 14(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 16530632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Water excitation MPRAGE: an alternative sequence for postcontrast imaging of the abdomen in noncooperative patients at 1.5 Tesla and 3.0 Tesla MRI.
    Altun E; Semelka RC; Dale BM; Elias J
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 May; 27(5):1146-54. PubMed ID: 18425826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A method to reduce the Gibbs ringing artifact in MRI scans while keeping tissue boundary integrity.
    Archibald R; Gelb A
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Apr; 21(4):305-19. PubMed ID: 12022619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional anisotropy contrast periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction (3DAC PROPELLER) on a 3.0T system: a new modality for routine clinical neuroimaging.
    Nakada T; Matsuzawa H; Fujii Y; Takahashi H; Nishizawa M; Kwee IL
    J Neuroimaging; 2006 Jul; 16(3):206-11. PubMed ID: 16808821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cardiac MRI of ischemic heart disease at 3 T: potential and challenges.
    Wieben O; Francois C; Reeder SB
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jan; 65(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 18077119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 3.0-T functional brain imaging: a 5-year experience.
    Scarabino T; Giannatempo GM; Popolizio T; Tosetti M; d'Alesio V; Esposito F; Di Salle F; Di Costanzo A; Bertolino A; Maggialetti A; Salvolini U
    Radiol Med; 2007 Feb; 112(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 17310287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microimaging at 14 tesla using GESEPI for removal of magnetic susceptibility artifacts in T(2)(*)-weighted image contrast.
    Yang QX; Smith MB; Briggs RW; Rycyna RE
    J Magn Reson; 1999 Nov; 141(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10527737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A review of MR physics: 3T versus 1.5T.
    Soher BJ; Dale BM; Merkle EM
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2007 Aug; 15(3):277-90, v. PubMed ID: 17893049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A modified projection reconstruction trajectory for reduction of undersampling artifacts.
    Wang WT; Grimm RC; Riederer SJ
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Feb; 21(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 15666405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultra-high-field MRI of the musculoskeletal system at 7.0T.
    Regatte RR; Schweitzer ME
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Feb; 25(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 17260399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What causes the "wet diaper" artifact? computed tomography and magnetic resonance observations.
    Markowitz RI; Altes TA; Jaramillo D
    Clin Imaging; 2009; 33(3):226-30. PubMed ID: 19411030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Adaptation of a wireless PC mouse for modification of GUI during intervention in an open highfield MRI at 1.0T].
    Pinkernelle JG; Streitparth F; Rump J; Teichgräber U
    Rofo; 2010 Apr; 182(4):348-52. PubMed ID: 20013633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MRCP imaging at 3.0 T vs. 1.5 T: preliminary experience in healthy volunteers.
    Isoda H; Kataoka M; Maetani Y; Kido A; Umeoka S; Tamai K; Koyama T; Nakamoto Y; Miki Y; Saga T; Togashi K
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 May; 25(5):1000-6. PubMed ID: 17410562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fast frequency selective MR imaging.
    Medic J; Tomazic S; Demsar F
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Sep; 23(7):769-78. PubMed ID: 16214607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MR imaging of the spine at 3T.
    Shapiro MD
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2006 Feb; 14(1):97-108. PubMed ID: 16530638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.