149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16958332)
1. ECHR 2006/9 Case of Lerios v. Cyprus, 23 March 2006, no. 68448/01 (first section).
Dute J
Eur J Health Law; 2006 Jun; 13(2):194-6. PubMed ID: 16958332
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Beyond negligence: administrative compensation for adverse medical outcomes.
Strunk AL; Queenan JT
Obstet Gynecol; 2010 May; 115(5):896-903. PubMed ID: 20410760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Healthy baby--hefty award? If a current trend continues, doctors could be forced to pay the cost of raising a healthy child whose conception they failed to prevent.
Lippman H
Med Econ; 2003 Mar; 80(5):83-6, 89. PubMed ID: 12688073
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. State Supreme Court ordered new trial after verdict for $5.1 million. Bedell v. Williams, 2012 Ark. 75-664 (2/23/2012)_S.W. 3.d _-AR.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2012 Jul; 53(2):1. PubMed ID: 22919776
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of birth-related medical malpractice litigation cases in Japan: review and discussion towards implementation of a no-fault compensation system.
Uesugi N; Yamanaka M; Suzuki T; Hirahara F
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2010 Aug; 36(4):717-25. PubMed ID: 20666935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2013/15 Case of Mehmet Sentürk and Bekir Sentürk v. Turkey, 9 April 2013, no. 14323/09 (Second Section).
Dute J
Eur J Health Law; 2013 Sep; 20(4):426-8. PubMed ID: 23977738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Effective legal reform and the malpractice insurance crisis.
Anderson RE
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(1):343-55. PubMed ID: 15742580
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Malpractice reform now.
Ignagni K
Healthplan; 2003; 44(2):7. PubMed ID: 12675001
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Medical malpractice and patient safety.
Avraham R
N Engl J Med; 2006 Aug; 355(7):735; author reply 736. PubMed ID: 16921589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Constitutionality of malpractice non-economic damage cap.
Weber RD
Mich Med; 2003; 102(5):7-8. PubMed ID: 14520908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Contingency fee legal actions in the U.S.A.
Hershkowitz L
Med Health R I; 2005 Jan; 88(1):35. PubMed ID: 15779559
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Problems with the administration of remittitur in medical malpractice cases. Does a solution exist?
Keane DB
J Leg Med; 2004 Mar; 25(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 15204914
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The case for a Missouri stabilization fund.
Reintjes SL
Mo Med; 2005; 102(6):500-1. PubMed ID: 16355631
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2016/14 Case of Vasileva v. Bulgaria, 17 March 2016, no. 23796/10 (Fifth Section).
Dute J
Eur J Health Law; 2016 Jun; 23(3):305-8. PubMed ID: 27491251
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. How high-low agreements work in a malpractice case.
Teichman PG
Fam Pract Manag; 2007 May; 14(5):43-5. PubMed ID: 17523380
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A medical mistake.
Schmitt CH
US News World Rep; 2003 Jun 30-Jul 7; 134(23):24, 26-7. PubMed ID: 12858780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Limiting damages for "pain and suffering" in medical malpractice.
Sloan FA
N C Med J; 2003; 64(4):191-4. PubMed ID: 12971246
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. ECHR 2004/4 case of I.P. v. Poland, 14 October 2003, no. 77831/01 (fourth section).
Eur J Health Law; 2004 Mar; 11(1):118-9. PubMed ID: 15285205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. More than just caps are needed to solve New Jersey's professional liability crisis.
Chang L
N J Med; 2004 May; 101(5):29-30. PubMed ID: 15185519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. When attorneys come back for seconds. Increased attorney fees for extraordinary work in medical malpractice cases.
Kemp R
J Leg Med; 2004 Mar; 25(1):79-93. PubMed ID: 15204915
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]