335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16958344)
21. CareFirst pares profits. Strategy aims to fulfill insurer's not-for-profit mission.
Benko LB
Mod Healthc; 2006 Mar; 36(13):26. PubMed ID: 16617901
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. N.Y. Blues plan seeks to stave off takeover.
Pallarito K
Mod Healthc; 1992 Jul; 22(30):18. PubMed ID: 10119574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Singing the Blues. Plans lost big on operations in '97; enrollment unscathed.
Rauber C
Mod Healthc; 1998 May; 28(21):20. PubMed ID: 10182309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The failed conversion of CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield to for-profit status: Part 2, Lessons learned.
McPherson B
Inquiry; 2004-2005 Winter; 41(4):360-4. PubMed ID: 15835595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Perspectives. The rebirth of the Blues.
Wiener JO
Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1991 Feb; 45(7):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10109124
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Too much money. Pa. regulators require Blues to submit surplus info.
Benko LB
Mod Healthc; 2004 Jan; 34(4):22. PubMed ID: 14959555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Nobody said change was easy. North Carolina Blues, state regulators battle over governance, premiums.
Galloro V
Mod Healthc; 2002 Mar; 32(9):22-3. PubMed ID: 11922004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Minn.'s Hatch blasts Blues deal. Says expensive disease-management deal not working.
Evans M
Mod Healthc; 2006 May; 36(18):12. PubMed ID: 16689431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Kaiser's road to fiscal fitness.
Benko LB
Mod Healthc; 2000 May; 30(21):28-9. PubMed ID: 11067546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. D.C. Blues plan gets aid extension.
Kenkel PJ
Mod Healthc; 1993 Mar; 23(9):17. PubMed ID: 10124237
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Blue Cross/Blue Shield plans adjust to competitive future.
Burke M
Hospitals; 1991 Dec; 65(23):48, 50, 52-3. PubMed ID: 1937460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Analysis of Blues' costs offers fascinating insights.
Capitation Rates Data; 2000 May; 5(5):49-51. PubMed ID: 11066969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Blues on the move.
Diamond F
Manag Care; 2002 Dec; 11(12):22-4, 26-7. PubMed ID: 12536955
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. New York lawmakers haggle over infusion to cut Blues' rate hikes.
Pallarito K
Mod Healthc; 1993 Jan; 23(2):11. PubMed ID: 10123620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Storm clouds in Michigan. Blues spars with governor over regulation, reform.
Benko LB
Mod Healthc; 2002 Mar; 32(9):12. PubMed ID: 11922000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Legal structure of and issues presented by the proposed reorganization of Empire Blue Cross and Blue Shield.
Mancino DM
Bull N Y Acad Med; 1997; 74(2):206-12. PubMed ID: 9439858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Getting to no: how Kansas advocates derailed the Anthem steamroller.
States Health; 2002; 11(4):1-10. PubMed ID: 12150167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Wash. launches probe of state's Blues plans.
de Lafuente D
Mod Healthc; 1993 Sep; 23(38):4. PubMed ID: 10128221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. They've got the blues. Minnesota Blues and hospitals point fingers regarding who is ultimately responsible for the nation's soaring healthcare costs.
Benko LB
Mod Healthc; 2002 Sep; 32(38):6-7, 13, 1. PubMed ID: 12375354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Why provider-sponsored plans' admin cost are lower than commercial, Blue Cross plans.
Capitation Manag Rep; 2004 Feb; 11(2):21-3, 13. PubMed ID: 15085776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
