These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

2241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16958698)

  • 21. Material characteristics of a novel shrinkage-free ZrSiO(4) ceramic for the fabrication of posterior crowns.
    Heydecke G; Butz F; Binder JR; Strub JR
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jul; 23(7):785-91. PubMed ID: 16949145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.
    Sailer I; Sailer T; Stawarczyk B; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):850-8. PubMed ID: 19865625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. ZrO2 three-unit fixed partial dentures: comparison of failure load before and after exposure to a mastication simulator.
    Att W; Grigoriadou M; Strub JR
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Apr; 34(4):282-90. PubMed ID: 17371566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns.
    Attia A; Abdelaziz KM; Freitag S; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 16473085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Fracture Strength of Zirconia and Alumina Ceramic Crowns Supported by Implants.
    Traini T; Sorrentino R; Gherlone E; Perfetti F; Bollero P; Zarone F
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jul; 41 Spec No():352-9. PubMed ID: 24779915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) generated with two CAD/CAM systems compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal single-unit posterior FDPs: a 5-year clinical prospective study.
    Vigolo P; Mutinelli S
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 22339945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fracture mode during cyclic loading of implant-supported single-tooth restorations.
    Hosseini M; Kleven E; Gotfredsen K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Aug; 108(2):74-83. PubMed ID: 22867804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Marginal adaptation of all-ceramic crowns on implant abutments.
    Att W; Hoischen T; Gerds T; Strub JR
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Dec; 10(4):218-25. PubMed ID: 18241217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effects of cyclic loading and preparation on the fracture strength of zirconium-dioxide implants: an in vitro investigation.
    Kohal RJ; Wolkewitz M; Tsakona A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Aug; 22(8):808-14. PubMed ID: 21320166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of marginal fit between all-porcelain margin versus alumina-supported margin on Procera Alumina crowns.
    Limkangwalmongkol P; Kee E; Chiche GJ; Blatz MB
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 19178619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Resistance to fracture of two all-ceramic crown materials following endodontic access.
    Wood KC; Berzins DW; Luo Q; Thompson GA; Toth JM; Nagy WW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jan; 95(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 16399273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Tolerance test of five different types of crowns on single-tooth implants.
    Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Rasmusson L
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(3):233-9. PubMed ID: 9728117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
    Foong JK; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Swain MV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of core thickness differences on post-fatigue indentation fracture resistance of veneered zirconia crowns.
    Alhasanyah A; Vaidyanathan TK; Flinton RJ
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):383-90. PubMed ID: 23387466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Contrast ratios and masking ability of three types of ceramic veneers.
    Chu FC; Chow TW; Chai J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Nov; 98(5):359-64. PubMed ID: 18021824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Marginal adaptation of three different zirconium dioxide three-unit fixed dental prostheses.
    Att W; Komine F; Gerds T; Strub JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):239-47. PubMed ID: 19328277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment with a commercially fabricated CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutment.
    Protopapadaki M; Monaco EA; Kim HI; Davis EL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 24011801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of implant abutment angulations on the fracture resistance of overlaying CAM-milled zirconia single crowns.
    Ellakwa A; Raj T; Deeb S; Ronaghi G; Martin FE; Klineberg I
    Aust Dent J; 2011 Jun; 56(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 21623803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of interface characterization and adhesion of glass ceramics to commercially pure titanium and gold alloy after thermal- and mechanical-loading.
    Vásquez VZ; Ozcan M; Kimpara ET
    Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 18718654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Strength of CAD/CAM-generated esthetic ceramic molar implant crowns.
    Wolf D; Bindl A; Schmidlin PR; Lüthy H; Mörmann WH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):609-17. PubMed ID: 18807555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 113.