These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
483 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16958883)
1. Can non-directional male mating preferences facilitate honest female ornamentation? Chenoweth SF; Doughty P; Kokko H Ecol Lett; 2006 Feb; 9(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 16958883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stronger convex (stabilizing) selection on homologous sexual display traits in females than in males: a multipopulation comparison in Drosophila serrata. Rundle HD; Chenoweth SF Evolution; 2011 Mar; 65(3):893-9. PubMed ID: 21361917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Female mate-choice drives the evolution of male-biased dispersal in a social mammal. Höner OP; Wachter B; East ML; Streich WJ; Wilhelm K; Burke T; Hofer H Nature; 2007 Aug; 448(7155):798-801. PubMed ID: 17700698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Male choice generates stabilizing sexual selection on a female fecundity correlate. Chenoweth SF; Petfield D; Doughty P; Blows MW J Evol Biol; 2007 Sep; 20(5):1745-50. PubMed ID: 17714292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An evolutionary limit to male mating success. McGuigan K; Van Homrigh A; Blows MW Evolution; 2008 Jun; 62(6):1528-37. PubMed ID: 18363864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The evolution of female mating preferences: differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation. McPeek MA; Gavrilets S Evolution; 2006 Oct; 60(10):1967-80. PubMed ID: 17133854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles. Fedina TY; Lewis SM Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Male versus female mate choice: sexual selection and the evolution of species recognition via reinforcement. Servedio MR Evolution; 2007 Dec; 61(12):2772-89. PubMed ID: 17924955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. No fecundity cost of female secondary sexual trait expression in the horned beetle Onthophagus sagittarius. Simmons LW; Emlen DJ J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1227-35. PubMed ID: 18631210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sexual selection and condition-dependent mate preferences. Cotton S; Small J; Pomiankowski A Curr Biol; 2006 Sep; 16(17):R755-65. PubMed ID: 16950102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evolution of mate choice for genome-wide heterozygosity. Fromhage L; Kokko H; Reid JM Evolution; 2009 Mar; 63(3):684-94. PubMed ID: 19220455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The evolution of reproductive character displacement conflicts with how sexual selection operates within a species. Higgie M; Blows MW Evolution; 2008 May; 62(5):1192-203. PubMed ID: 18298640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gentlemen prefer blondes: the evolution of mate preference among strategically allocated males. Rowell JT; Servedio MR Am Nat; 2009 Jan; 173(1):12-25. PubMed ID: 19063659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reconciling sexual selection to species recognition: a process-based model of mating decision. Castellano S; Cermelli P J Theor Biol; 2006 Oct; 242(3):529-38. PubMed ID: 16712871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mate choice evolution, dominance effects, and the maintenance of genetic variation. Lehmann L; Keller LF; Kokko H J Theor Biol; 2007 Jan; 244(2):282-95. PubMed ID: 16979189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Female mate preferences in Drosophila simulans: evolution and costs. Sharma MD; Tregenza T; Hosken DJ J Evol Biol; 2010 Aug; 23(8):1672-9. PubMed ID: 20546089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Female preference for symmetrical males as a by-product of selection for mate recognition. Johnstone RA Nature; 1994 Nov; 372(6502):172-5. PubMed ID: 7969449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evolutionary dynamics of a sexual ornament in the house sparrow (Passer domesticus): the role of indirect selection within and between sexes. Jensen H; Steinsland I; Ringsby TH; Saether BE Evolution; 2008 Jun; 62(6):1275-93. PubMed ID: 18384654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of a parasitic nematode on male mate choice in a livebearing fish with a coercive mating system (western mosquitofish, Gambusia affinis). Deaton R Behav Processes; 2009 Jan; 80(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18765273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes. Neff BD; Pitcher TE Mol Ecol; 2005 Jan; 14(1):19-38. PubMed ID: 15643948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]