BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16958885)

  • 1. Assessing environmental risks of transgenic plants.
    Andow DA; Zwahlen C
    Ecol Lett; 2006 Feb; 9(2):196-214. PubMed ID: 16958885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Potential for the environmental impact of transgenic crops.
    Dale PJ; Clarke B; Fontes EM
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Jun; 20(6):567-74. PubMed ID: 12042859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Proposed definition of environmental damage illustrated by the cases of genetically modified crops and invasive species.
    Bartz R; Heink U; Kowarik I
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Jun; 24(3):675-81. PubMed ID: 20015260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Altered pesticide use on transgenic crops and the associated general impact from an environmental perspective.
    Kleter GA; Bhula R; Bodnaruk K; Carazo E; Felsot AS; Harris CA; Katayama A; Kuiper HA; Racke KD; Rubin B; Shevah Y; Stephenson GR; Tanaka K; Unsworth J; Wauchope RD; Wong SS
    Pest Manag Sci; 2007 Nov; 63(11):1107-15. PubMed ID: 17880042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of risk of insect-resistant transgenic crops to nontarget arthropods.
    Romeis J; Bartsch D; Bigler F; Candolfi MP; Gielkens MM; Hartley SE; Hellmich RL; Huesing JE; Jepson PC; Layton R; Quemada H; Raybould A; Rose RI; Schiemann J; Sears MK; Shelton AM; Sweet J; Vaituzis Z; Wolt JD
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Feb; 26(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 18259178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ecological impacts of genetically modified crops: ten years of field research and commercial cultivation.
    Sanvido O; Romeis J; Bigler F
    Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2007; 107():235-78. PubMed ID: 17522828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing effects of transgenic crops on soil microbial communities.
    Widmer F
    Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2007; 107():207-34. PubMed ID: 17522827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gene flow, invasiveness, and ecological impact of genetically modified crops.
    Warwick SI; Beckie HJ; Hall LM
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Jun; 1168():72-99. PubMed ID: 19566704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Environmental release of living modified organisms: current approaches and case studies.
    Thomas E; Nickson PD
    Tsitol Genet; 2005; 39(3):37-42. PubMed ID: 16250244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetically modified crops: success, safety assessment, and public concern.
    Singh OV; Ghai S; Paul D; Jain RK
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2006 Aug; 71(5):598-607. PubMed ID: 16639559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A screening method for prioritizing non-target invertebrates for improved biosafety testing of transgenic crops.
    Todd JH; Ramankutty P; Barraclough EI; Malone LA
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2008; 7(1):35-56. PubMed ID: 18384728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The bucket and the searchlight: formulating and testing risk hypotheses about the weediness and invasiveness potential of transgenic crops.
    Raybould A
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2010; 9(3):123-33. PubMed ID: 21975253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Problems in monitoring horizontal gene transfer in field trials of transgenic plants.
    Heinemann JA; Traavik T
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Sep; 22(9):1105-9. PubMed ID: 15340480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of transgenic crops in sustainable development.
    Raymond Park J; McFarlane I; Hartley Phipps R; Ceddia G
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2011 Jan; 9(1):2-21. PubMed ID: 21040386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic use restriction technologies (GURTs): strategies to impede transgene movement.
    Hills MJ; Hall L; Arnison PG; Good AG
    Trends Plant Sci; 2007 Apr; 12(4):177-83. PubMed ID: 17360223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic and ecological consequences of transgene flow to the wild flora.
    Felber F; Kozlowski G; Arrigo N; Guadagnuolo R
    Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2007; 107():173-205. PubMed ID: 17522826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transgenic plants as vital components of integrated pest management.
    Kos M; van Loon JJ; Dicke M; Vet LE
    Trends Biotechnol; 2009 Nov; 27(11):621-7. PubMed ID: 19783315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gene flow from glyphosate-resistant crops.
    Mallory-Smith C; Zapiola M
    Pest Manag Sci; 2008 Apr; 64(4):428-40. PubMed ID: 18181145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Geneflow from GM plants--towards a more quantitative risk assessment.
    Poppy GM
    Trends Biotechnol; 2004 Sep; 22(9):436-8. PubMed ID: 15331221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.