These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16958885)

  • 1. Assessing environmental risks of transgenic plants.
    Andow DA; Zwahlen C
    Ecol Lett; 2006 Feb; 9(2):196-214. PubMed ID: 16958885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Potential for the environmental impact of transgenic crops.
    Dale PJ; Clarke B; Fontes EM
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Jun; 20(6):567-74. PubMed ID: 12042859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Proposed definition of environmental damage illustrated by the cases of genetically modified crops and invasive species.
    Bartz R; Heink U; Kowarik I
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Jun; 24(3):675-81. PubMed ID: 20015260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Altered pesticide use on transgenic crops and the associated general impact from an environmental perspective.
    Kleter GA; Bhula R; Bodnaruk K; Carazo E; Felsot AS; Harris CA; Katayama A; Kuiper HA; Racke KD; Rubin B; Shevah Y; Stephenson GR; Tanaka K; Unsworth J; Wauchope RD; Wong SS
    Pest Manag Sci; 2007 Nov; 63(11):1107-15. PubMed ID: 17880042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of risk of insect-resistant transgenic crops to nontarget arthropods.
    Romeis J; Bartsch D; Bigler F; Candolfi MP; Gielkens MM; Hartley SE; Hellmich RL; Huesing JE; Jepson PC; Layton R; Quemada H; Raybould A; Rose RI; Schiemann J; Sears MK; Shelton AM; Sweet J; Vaituzis Z; Wolt JD
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Feb; 26(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 18259178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ecological impacts of genetically modified crops: ten years of field research and commercial cultivation.
    Sanvido O; Romeis J; Bigler F
    Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2007; 107():235-78. PubMed ID: 17522828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing effects of transgenic crops on soil microbial communities.
    Widmer F
    Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2007; 107():207-34. PubMed ID: 17522827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gene flow, invasiveness, and ecological impact of genetically modified crops.
    Warwick SI; Beckie HJ; Hall LM
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Jun; 1168():72-99. PubMed ID: 19566704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Environmental release of living modified organisms: current approaches and case studies.
    Thomas E; Nickson PD
    Tsitol Genet; 2005; 39(3):37-42. PubMed ID: 16250244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetically modified crops: success, safety assessment, and public concern.
    Singh OV; Ghai S; Paul D; Jain RK
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2006 Aug; 71(5):598-607. PubMed ID: 16639559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A screening method for prioritizing non-target invertebrates for improved biosafety testing of transgenic crops.
    Todd JH; Ramankutty P; Barraclough EI; Malone LA
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2008; 7(1):35-56. PubMed ID: 18384728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The bucket and the searchlight: formulating and testing risk hypotheses about the weediness and invasiveness potential of transgenic crops.
    Raybould A
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2010; 9(3):123-33. PubMed ID: 21975253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Problems in monitoring horizontal gene transfer in field trials of transgenic plants.
    Heinemann JA; Traavik T
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Sep; 22(9):1105-9. PubMed ID: 15340480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of transgenic crops in sustainable development.
    Raymond Park J; McFarlane I; Hartley Phipps R; Ceddia G
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2011 Jan; 9(1):2-21. PubMed ID: 21040386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic use restriction technologies (GURTs): strategies to impede transgene movement.
    Hills MJ; Hall L; Arnison PG; Good AG
    Trends Plant Sci; 2007 Apr; 12(4):177-83. PubMed ID: 17360223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic and ecological consequences of transgene flow to the wild flora.
    Felber F; Kozlowski G; Arrigo N; Guadagnuolo R
    Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2007; 107():173-205. PubMed ID: 17522826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transgenic plants as vital components of integrated pest management.
    Kos M; van Loon JJ; Dicke M; Vet LE
    Trends Biotechnol; 2009 Nov; 27(11):621-7. PubMed ID: 19783315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gene flow from glyphosate-resistant crops.
    Mallory-Smith C; Zapiola M
    Pest Manag Sci; 2008 Apr; 64(4):428-40. PubMed ID: 18181145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Geneflow from GM plants--towards a more quantitative risk assessment.
    Poppy GM
    Trends Biotechnol; 2004 Sep; 22(9):436-8. PubMed ID: 15331221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.