These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16958885)

  • 21. EU biotech crop regulations and environmental risk: a case of the emperor's new clothes?
    Morris SH
    Trends Biotechnol; 2007 Jan; 25(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 17113665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Does the use of transgenic plants diminish or promote biodiversity?
    Raven PH
    N Biotechnol; 2010 Nov; 27(5):528-33. PubMed ID: 20678596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Design and management of field trials of transgenic cereals.
    Bedo Z; Rakszegi M; Láng L
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 478():305-14. PubMed ID: 19009453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Crop improvement using small RNAs: applications and predictive ecological risk assessments.
    Auer C; Frederick R
    Trends Biotechnol; 2009 Nov; 27(11):644-51. PubMed ID: 19796832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Developing risk hypotheses and selecting species for assessing non-target impacts of GM trees with novel traits: the case of altered-lignin pine trees.
    Malone LA; Todd JH; Burgess EP; Walter C; Wagner A; Barratt BI
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2010; 9(4):181-98. PubMed ID: 22293130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Gene flow in Prunus species in the context of novel trait risk assessment.
    Cici SZ; Van Acker RC
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2010; 9(2):75-85. PubMed ID: 21288463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Basic framework for risk assessment for transgenic plants developed by the OECD: 20 years after the OECD "Blue Book".
    Bergmans H
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(4):213-8. PubMed ID: 17640511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessing the risks associated with new agricultural practices.
    Hails RS
    Nature; 2002 Aug; 418(6898):685-8. PubMed ID: 12167875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Ecological risk assessment for transgenic crops: separating the seed from the chaff.
    Herman RA
    Trends Biotechnol; 2010 Apr; 28(4):159-60. PubMed ID: 20129685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Identifying food proteins with allergenic potential: evolution of approaches to safety assessment and research to provide additional tools.
    Ladics GS; Selgrade MK
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Aug; 54(3 Suppl):S2-6. PubMed ID: 19028539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Current scientific understanding of the environmental biosafety of transgenic fish and shellfish.
    Kapuscinski AR
    Rev Sci Tech; 2005 Apr; 24(1):309-22. PubMed ID: 16110898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Problem formulation and hypothesis testing for environmental risk assessments of genetically modified crops.
    Raybould A
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(3):119-25. PubMed ID: 17445509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Ecological risk assessment conceptual model formulation for nonindigenous species.
    Landis WG
    Risk Anal; 2004 Aug; 24(4):847-58. PubMed ID: 15357804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Glyphosate: a once-in-a-century herbicide.
    Duke SO; Powles SB
    Pest Manag Sci; 2008 Apr; 64(4):319-25. PubMed ID: 18273882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evolutionary biology and practical conservation: bridging a widening gap.
    Mace GM; Purvis A
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Jan; 17(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 17696991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reducing uncertainty in regulatory decision-making for transgenic crops: more ecological research or clearer environmental risk assessment?
    Raybould A
    GM Crops; 2010; 1(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 21912209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Spatial distribution of Aglais urticae (L.) and its host plant Urtica dioica (L.) in an agricultural landscape: implications for Bt maize risk assessment and post-market monitoring.
    Gathmann A; Wirooks L; Eckert J; Schuphan I
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 16978572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. UK farm-scale evaluations of transgenic herbicide-tolerant crops.
    Andow DA
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Dec; 21(12):1453-4. PubMed ID: 14647329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Conservation biology, genetically modified organisms, and the biosafety protocol.
    Hill R; Sendashonga C
    Conserv Biol; 2006 Dec; 20(6):1620-5. PubMed ID: 17181797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Challenges in radioecology.
    Salbu B
    J Environ Radioact; 2009 Dec; 100(12):1086-91. PubMed ID: 19457600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.