876 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16958958)
1. Outcome of men presenting with clinical breast problems: the role of mammography and ultrasound.
Patterson SK; Helvie MA; Aziz K; Nees AV
Breast J; 2006; 12(5):418-23. PubMed ID: 16958958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of diagnostic mammography and breast ultrasound during pregnancy and lactation.
Robbins J; Jeffries D; Roubidoux M; Helvie M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Mar; 196(3):716-22. PubMed ID: 21343518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. To evaluate the role of sonography as an adjunct to mammography in women with dense breasts.
Masroor I; Ahmed MN; Pasha S
J Pak Med Assoc; 2009 May; 59(5):298-301. PubMed ID: 19438134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective evaluation of the value of combined mammographic and sonographic assessment in patients with palpable abnormalities of the breast.
Shetty MK; Shah YP; Sharman RS
J Ultrasound Med; 2003 Mar; 22(3):263-8; quiz 269-70. PubMed ID: 12636326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Electrical impedance scanning in the differentiation of suspicious breast lesions: comparison with mammography, ultrasound and histopathology].
Fuchsjäger MH; Helbich TH; Ringl H; Funovics MA; Rudas M; Riedl C; Pfarl G
Rofo; 2002 Dec; 174(12):1522-9. PubMed ID: 12471524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stereotactic core-needle breast biopsy by surgeons: minimum 2-year follow-up of benign lesions.
Burns RP; Brown JP; Roe SM; Sprouse LR; Yancey AE; Witherspoon LE
Ann Surg; 2000 Oct; 232(4):542-8. PubMed ID: 10998652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Malignant and benign diseases of the breast in 41 male patients: mammography, sonography and pathohistological correlations].
Partik B; Mallek R; Rudas M; Pokieser P; Wunderbaldinger P; Helbich TH
Rofo; 2001 Nov; 173(11):1012-8. PubMed ID: 11704911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. False-negative rate of combined mammography and ultrasound for women with palpable breast masses.
Chan CH; Coopey SB; Freer PE; Hughes KS
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Oct; 153(3):699-702. PubMed ID: 26341750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Percutaneous stereotactic biopsy of non-palpable breast lesions using the Advanced Breast Biopsy Instrumentation (ABBI) system: critical evaluation of indication strategies].
Wedegärtner U; Otto U; Buitrago-Tellez C; Bremerich J; Oertli D; Torhorst J; Bongartz G
Rofo; 2001 Mar; 173(3):224-8. PubMed ID: 11293864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Negative predictive value of sonography and mammography in patients with focal breast pain.
Tumyan L; Hoyt AC; Bassett LW
Breast J; 2005; 11(5):333-7. PubMed ID: 16174154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparative analysis of early diagnostic tools for breast cancer].
Shen SJ; Sun Q; Xu YL; Zhou YD; Guan JH; Mao F; Lin Y; Wang XJ; Han SM
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 34(11):877-80. PubMed ID: 23291142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Fine needle aspiration biopsy of breast lesions: institutional experience].
Medina-Franco H; Abarca-Pérez L; Cortés-González R; Soto-Germes S; Ulloa JA; Uribe N
Rev Invest Clin; 2005; 57(3):394-8. PubMed ID: 16187698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of mammographic appearances after breast fine-needle aspiration.
Hindle WH; Chen EC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 176(6):1286-90; discussion 1290-2. PubMed ID: 9215186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial.
Bazzocchi M; Zuiani C; Panizza P; Del Frate C; Soldano F; Isola M; Sardanelli F; Giuseppetti GM; Simonetti G; Lattanzio V; Del Maschio A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jun; 186(6):1723-32. PubMed ID: 16714666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sonographic detection and sonographically guided biopsy of breast microcalcifications.
Soo MS; Baker JA; Rosen EL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Apr; 180(4):941-8. PubMed ID: 12646433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Negative predictive value of sonography with mammography in patients with palpable breast lesions.
Soo MS; Rosen EL; Baker JA; Vo TT; Boyd BA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Nov; 177(5):1167-70. PubMed ID: 11641195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection: pilot clinical trial.
Helvie MA; Hadjiiski L; Makariou E; Chan HP; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Lo SC; Freedman M; Adler D; Bailey J; Blane C; Hoff D; Hunt K; Joynt L; Klein K; Paramagul C; Patterson SK; Roubidoux MA
Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):208-14. PubMed ID: 14990808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incremental clinical value of ultrasound in men with mammographically confirmed gynecomastia.
Chen PH; Slanetz PJ
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 24161780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Diagnostic value of full-field digital mammography for breast carcinoma].
Ding JH; Peng WJ; Jiang ZX; Xu LH; Hu DT; Zheng XJ
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2009 Nov; 31(11):854-7. PubMed ID: 20137352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
