These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16959306)

  • 1. Comparison of computer-assisted and manual screening of cervical cytology.
    Lozano R
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jan; 104(1):134-8. PubMed ID: 16959306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implementation of the ThinPrep Imaging System in a tertiary military medical center.
    Duby JM; DiFurio MJ
    Cancer; 2009 Aug; 117(4):264-70. PubMed ID: 19536887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Health technology assessment report: Computer-assisted Pap test for cervical cancer screening].
    Della Palma P; Moresco L; Giorgi Rossi P
    Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(5 Suppl 3):e1-43. PubMed ID: 23139174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implementation of the ThinPrep imaging system in a high-volume metropolitan laboratory.
    Miller FS; Nagel LE; Kenny-Moynihan MB
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Apr; 35(4):213-7. PubMed ID: 17351933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance of an imaging system vs. manual screening in the detection of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix.
    Dziura B; Quinn S; Richard K
    Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(3):309-11. PubMed ID: 16780026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A retrospective validation of the FocalPoint GS slide profiler NFR technology by analysis of interval disease outcomes compared with manual cytology.
    Nuttall DS; Hillier S; Clayton HR; Savage AJ; Martin CM; O'Leary JJ
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2019 Apr; 127(4):240-246. PubMed ID: 30825407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness of the ThinPrep Imaging System: clinical experience in a low risk screening population.
    Papillo JL; St John TL; Leiman G
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2008 Mar; 36(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 18232005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of liquid-based Pap tests: comparison of concurrent liquid-based tests and cervical biopsies on 782 women with previously abnormal Pap smears.
    Guo M; Hu L; Martin L; Liu S; Baliga M; Hughson MD
    Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 15839615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative analysis of cervical cytology screening methods and staining protocols for detection rate and accurate interpretation of ASC-H: Data from a high-volume laboratory in Turkey.
    Ozlem A; Umit I
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Nov; 43(11):863-9. PubMed ID: 26173757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of ThinPrep Integrated Imager-Assisted Screening versus Manual Screening of ThinPrep Liquid-Based Cytology Specimens.
    Tanaka K; Aoki D; Tozawa-Ono A; Suzuki N; Takamatsu K; Nakamura M; Tsunoda H; Seino S; Kobayashi N; Shirayama T; Takahashi F
    Acta Cytol; 2020; 64(5):486-491. PubMed ID: 32535593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Utility of the Thin Prep Imaging System® in the detection of squamous intraepithelial abnormalities on retrospective evaluation: can we trust the imager?
    Barroeta JE; Reilly ME; Steinhoff MM; Lawrence WD
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2012 Feb; 40(2):124-7. PubMed ID: 22246928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multicenter comparison of manual and automated screening of AutoCyte gynecologic preparations.
    Bishop JW; Kaufman RH; Taylor DA
    Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 9987448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance and reproducibility of gynecologic cytology interpretation using the FocalPoint system: results of the RODEO Study Team.
    Stein MD; Fregnani JH; Scapulatempo C; Mafra A; Campacci N; Longatto-Filho A;
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2013 Oct; 140(4):567-71. PubMed ID: 24045555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the SurePath liquid-based Papanicolaou smear with the conventional Papanicolaou smear in a multisite direct-to-vial study.
    Fremont-Smith M; Marino J; Griffin B; Spencer L; Bolick D
    Cancer; 2004 Oct; 102(5):269-79. PubMed ID: 15386329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the clinical significance of the Papanicolaou test interpretations LSIL cannot rule out HSIL and ASC-H.
    Difurio MJ; Mailhiot T; Sundborg MJ; Nauschuetz KK
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2010 May; 38(5):313-7. PubMed ID: 19813258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Utility of residual AutoCyte cervical cytology samples for image analysis.
    Bishop JW; Cheuvront DA; Elston RJ
    Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 9987449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Value of computer-assisted slide-screening system in ThinPrep cervical cytology].
    Yang J; Tao K; Yang H; Guo ZH; Hu YM; Tan ZY
    Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 42(9):609-12. PubMed ID: 24314247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The artificial intelligence-assisted cytology diagnostic system in large-scale cervical cancer screening: A population-based cohort study of 0.7 million women.
    Bao H; Sun X; Zhang Y; Pang B; Li H; Zhou L; Wu F; Cao D; Wang J; Turic B; Wang L
    Cancer Med; 2020 Sep; 9(18):6896-6906. PubMed ID: 32697872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. PAPNET-assisted rescreening of cervical smears: cost and accuracy compared with a 100% manual rescreening strategy.
    O'Leary TJ; Tellado M; Buckner SB; Ali IS; Stevens A; Ollayos CW
    JAMA; 1998 Jan; 279(3):235-7. PubMed ID: 9438746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The significance of "low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion" as a distinct squamous abnormality category in Papanicolaou tests.
    Elsheikh TM; Kirkpatrick JL; Wu HH
    Cancer; 2006 Oct; 108(5):277-81. PubMed ID: 16937376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.