These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16959525)

  • 1. [Quality control of prenatal ultrasound. A role for biometry].
    Salomon LJ; Bernard JP; Ville Y
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Sep; 34(9):683-91. PubMed ID: 16959525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The science and art of quality in obstetric ultrasound.
    Salomon LJ; Ville Y
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Apr; 21(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 19300252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A score-based method for quality control of fetal images at routine second-trimester ultrasound examination.
    Salomon LJ; Winer N; Bernard JP; Ville Y
    Prenat Diagn; 2008 Sep; 28(9):822-7. PubMed ID: 18646244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Standardization of fetal ultrasound biometry measurements: improving the quality and consistency of measurements.
    Sarris I; Ioannou C; Dighe M; Mitidieri A; Oberto M; Qingqing W; Shah J; Sohoni S; Al Zidjali W; Hoch L; Altman DG; Papageorghiou AT;
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Dec; 38(6):681-7. PubMed ID: 22411446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Standardisation and quality control of ultrasound measurements taken in the INTERGROWTH-21st Project.
    Sarris I; Ioannou C; Ohuma EO; Altman DG; Hoch L; Cosgrove C; Fathima S; Salomon LJ; Papageorghiou AT;
    BJOG; 2013 Sep; 120 Suppl 2():33-7, v. PubMed ID: 23841486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Obstetric/Prenatal ultrasound: blessing or burden?].
    Winter R; Kimmig R; Fink D
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2005 Apr; 45(2):60-1. PubMed ID: 15818047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ultrasound screening for fetal structural anomalies.
    Gomez KJ; Copel JA
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Apr; 5(2):204-10. PubMed ID: 8490090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement error for ultrasound fetal biometry performed by paramedics in rural Bangladesh.
    Neufeld LM; Wagatsuma Y; Hussain R; Begum M; Frongillo EA
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 34(4):387-94. PubMed ID: 19504627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Continuous independent quality control for fetal ultrasound biometry provided by the cumulative summation technique.
    Balsyte D; Schäffer L; Burkhardt T; Wisser J; Zimmermann R; Kurmanavicius J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 35(4):449-55. PubMed ID: 20052663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fetal biometry by an inexperienced operator using two- and three-dimensional ultrasound.
    Yang F; Leung KY; Lee YP; Chan HY; Tang MH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 May; 35(5):566-71. PubMed ID: 20183864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality control of fetal biometric evaluation and Doppler ultrasound.
    Granozio G; Napolitano R
    Minerva Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 73(4):415-422. PubMed ID: 33904693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of the experience of the investigator on the rate of sonographic diagnosis of fetal malformations in Vienna.
    Bernaschek G; Stuempflen I; Deutinger J
    Prenat Diagn; 1996 Sep; 16(9):807-11. PubMed ID: 8905894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. French fetal biometry: reference equations and comparison with other charts.
    Salomon LJ; Duyme M; Crequat J; Brodaty G; Talmant C; Fries N; Althuser M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 28(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 16570263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 'Ceci n'est pas une échographie': a plea for quality assessment in prenatal ultrasound.
    Ville Y
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 31(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 18098345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Re: Feasibility and reproducibility of an image-scoring method for quality control of fetal biometry in the second trimester.
    Dudley N
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 28(3):352. PubMed ID: 16909408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fetal sheep development on ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging: a standard for the in utero assessment of models of congenital abnormalities.
    Ward VL; Estroff JA; Nguyen HT; Lakshmanan Y; Hayward A; Jaramillo D; Zurakowski D; Dunning PS; Peters CA; Barnewolt CE
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2006; 21(5):444-57. PubMed ID: 16912495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Medical and ethical problems posed by the prenatal diagnosis of distal absence of a limb].
    Belhassen W; Pons JC; Fournet P; Frydman R
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1992; 21(5):475-8. PubMed ID: 1401758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ultrasound in prenatal diagnosis: polemics around routine ultrasound screening for second trimester fetal malformations.
    Levi S
    Prenat Diagn; 2002 Apr; 22(4):285-95. PubMed ID: 11981909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of choice of reference charts and equations on the assessment of fetal biometry.
    Salomon LJ; Bernard JP; Duyme M; Buvat I; Ville Y
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jun; 25(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 15909324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The antenatal diagnosis of fetal abnormalities: a 10 year audit of influencing factors.
    Dillon E; Walton SM
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Apr; 70(832):341-6. PubMed ID: 9166068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.