These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16959527)

  • 1. [Transparency of results in assisted reproductive technology].
    Larue L; Pouly JL
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Sep; 34(9):770-3. PubMed ID: 16959527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2001 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry.
    ;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Jun; 87(6):1253-66. PubMed ID: 17276436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2003 results from the Canadian ART Register.
    Gunby J; Daya S;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Sep; 88(3):550-9. PubMed ID: 17303133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assisted reproductive technologies in Canada: 2005 results from the Canadian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Register.
    Gunby J; Bissonnette F; Librach C; Cowan L;
    Fertil Steril; 2009 May; 91(5):1721-30. PubMed ID: 18423460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of legislation on outcomes of assisted reproduction technology: lessons from the 2004 Italian law.
    La Sala GB; Villani MT; Nicoli A; Valli B; Iannotti F; Blickstein I
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Apr; 89(4):854-9. PubMed ID: 17681340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2002 results from the Canadian ART Register.
    Gunby J; Daya S;
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Nov; 86(5):1356-64. PubMed ID: 17070192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assisted reproductive technology in the new millennium: part II.
    Boyle KE; Vlahos N; Jarow JP
    Urology; 2004 Feb; 63(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 14972457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of selecting oocytes for insemination and transferring all resultant embryos without selection on outcomes of assisted reproduction.
    La Sala GB; Nicoli A; Villani MT; Di Girolamo R; Capodanno F; Blickstein I
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Jan; 91(1):96-100. PubMed ID: 18249374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fertilization, embryo development, and clinical outcome of immature oocytes from stimulated intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.
    Shu Y; Gebhardt J; Watt J; Lyon J; Dasig D; Behr B
    Fertil Steril; 2007 May; 87(5):1022-7. PubMed ID: 17261289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Clinical effects of oocyte cryopreservation in assisted reproduction technology].
    Wang W; Yan ZJ; Cai LB; Chai DC; Liu CZ; Mao YD; Liu JY
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 88(39):2755-8. PubMed ID: 19080449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Laser assisted hatching: Rouen University Hospital outcomes].
    Blessmann-Roset J; Rives N; Clavier B; Milazzo JP; Mazurier S; Mousset-Siméon N; Macé B
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2009 Apr; 37(4):313-20. PubMed ID: 19346148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The relative contribution of assisted reproductive technologies and ovulation induction to multiple births in the United States 5 years after the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology/American Society for Reproductive Medicine recommendation to limit the number of embryos transferred.
    Dickey RP
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Dec; 88(6):1554-61. PubMed ID: 17481621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Single-embryo transfer: Rennes' Hospital experience].
    Le Lannou D; Laurent MC; Griveau JF; Véron E; Jaffré F; Jouve G; Gueho A; Morcel K
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2008 Nov; 36(11):1158-61. PubMed ID: 18849181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laser assisted hatching in good prognosis patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial.
    Sagoskin AW; Levy MJ; Tucker MJ; Richter KS; Widra EA
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Feb; 87(2):283-7. PubMed ID: 17094975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2006: results generated from European registers by ESHRE.
    de Mouzon J; Goossens V; Bhattacharya S; Castilla JA; Ferraretti AP; Korsak V; Kupka M; Nygren KG; Nyboe Andersen A;
    Hum Reprod; 2010 Aug; 25(8):1851-62. PubMed ID: 20570973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimizing the number of blastocyst stage embryos to transfer on day 5 or 6 in women 38 years of age and older: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology database study.
    Stern JE; Goldman MB; Hatasaka H; MacKenzie TA; Racowsky C; Surrey ES;
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Jan; 91(1):157-66. PubMed ID: 18222441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2004: results generated from European registers by ESHRE.
    Andersen AN; Goossens V; Ferraretti AP; Bhattacharya S; Felberbaum R; de Mouzon J; Nygren KG; ;
    Hum Reprod; 2008 Apr; 23(4):756-71. PubMed ID: 18281243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Brown oocytes: implications for assisted reproductive technology.
    Esfandiari N; Burjaq H; Gotlieb L; Casper RF
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Nov; 86(5):1522-5. PubMed ID: 16989830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assisted reproductive technologies and multiple gestations.
    Wilson EE
    Clin Perinatol; 2005 Jun; 32(2):315-28, v. PubMed ID: 15922785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Are French results in assisted reproductive techniques so bad?].
    Pouly JL; Larue L
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Jan; 35(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 17208496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.