These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The evolution of warning signals as reliable indicators of prey defense. Sherratt TN; Beatty CD Am Nat; 2003 Oct; 162(4):377-89. PubMed ID: 14582002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Conditions for the spread of conspicuous warning signals: a numerical model with novel insights. Puurtinen M; Kaitala V Evolution; 2006 Nov; 60(11):2246-56. PubMed ID: 17236418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A field demonstration of the costs and benefits of group living to edible and defended prey. Curley EA; Rowley HE; Speed MP Biol Lett; 2015 Jun; 11(6):20150152. PubMed ID: 26085497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How can automimicry persist when predators can preferentially consume undefended mimics? Ruxton GD; Speed MP Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Feb; 273(1584):373-8. PubMed ID: 16543181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Avian predators taste-reject aposematic prey on the basis of their chemical defence. Skelhorn J; Rowe C Biol Lett; 2006 Sep; 2(3):348-50. PubMed ID: 17148400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Aposematism: what should our starting point be? Speed MP; Ruxton GD Proc Biol Sci; 2005 Feb; 272(1561):431-8. PubMed ID: 15734698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Aposematic signals and the relationship between conspicuousness and distinctiveness. Merilaita S; Ruxton GD J Theor Biol; 2007 Mar; 245(2):268-77. PubMed ID: 17157321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multiple benefits of gregariousness cover detectability costs in aposematic aggregations. Riipi M; Alatalo RV; Lindström L; Mappes J Nature; 2001 Oct; 413(6855):512-4. PubMed ID: 11586357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do unprofitable prey evolve traits that profitable prey find difficult to exploit? Sherratt TN; Franks DW Proc Biol Sci; 2005 Nov; 272(1579):2441-7. PubMed ID: 16243687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Frequency-dependent taste-rejection by avian predation may select for defence chemical polymorphisms in aposematic prey. Skelhorn J; Rowe C Biol Lett; 2005 Dec; 1(4):500-3. PubMed ID: 17148243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Avian predators attack aposematic prey more forcefully when they are part of an aggregation. Skelhorn J; Ruxton GD Biol Lett; 2006 Dec; 2(4):488-90. PubMed ID: 17148269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perspective: the evolution of warning coloration is not paradoxical. Marples NM; Kelly DJ; Thomas RJ Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):933-40. PubMed ID: 16136793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The evolution of conspicuousness in frogs: When to signal toxicity? Roberts SM; Stuart-Fox D; Medina I J Evol Biol; 2022 Nov; 35(11):1455-1464. PubMed ID: 36129907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A role for phenotypic plasticity in the evolution of aposematism. Sword GA Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Aug; 269(1501):1639-44. PubMed ID: 12204123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]