158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16959732)
1. The effects of digital noise reduction on the acceptance of background noise.
Mueller HG; Weber J; Hornsby BW
Trends Amplif; 2006 Jun; 10(2):83-93. PubMed ID: 16959732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of hearing aid signal-processing schemes on acceptable noise levels: perception and prediction.
Wu YH; Stangl E
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):333-41. PubMed ID: 23334355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of noise reduction technologies on the acceptance of background noise.
Lowery KJ; Plyler PN
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Sep; 24(8):649-59. PubMed ID: 24131601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Effect of Digital Noise Reduction on Annoyance and Speech Perception in Low and High Acceptable Noise Level Groups.
Shetty HN; Nanjundaswamy NB
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Oct; 23(4):e433-e439. PubMed ID: 31649764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of audiovisual and binaural listening on the acceptable noise level (ANL): establishing an ANL conceptual model.
Wu YH; Stangl E; Pang C; Zhang X
J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):141-53. PubMed ID: 24828215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital noise reduction: outcomes from laboratory and field studies.
Bentler R; Wu YH; Kettel J; Hurtig R
Int J Audiol; 2008 Aug; 47(8):447-60. PubMed ID: 18698521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of speech perception in background noise with acceptance of background noise in aided and unaided conditions.
Nabelek AK; Tampas JW; Burchfield SB
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Oct; 47(5):1001-11. PubMed ID: 15603458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measurement and prediction of the acceptable noise level for single-microphone noise reduction algorithms.
Fredelake S; Holube I; Schlueter A; Hansen M
Int J Audiol; 2012 Apr; 51(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 22316007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Real-time multiband dynamic compression and noise reduction for binaural hearing aids.
Kollmeier B; Peissig J; Hohmann V
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 8263832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of digital signal processing features on children's speech recognition and loudness perception.
Crukley J; Scollie SD
Am J Audiol; 2014 Mar; 23(1):99-115. PubMed ID: 24018572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Effects of Hearing Aid Digital Noise Reduction and Directionality on Acceptable Noise Level.
Ahmadi R; Jalilvand H; Mahdavi ME; Ahmadi F; Baghban ARA
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Dec; 11(4):267-274. PubMed ID: 29902915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Effects of Signal to Noise Ratio, T60 , Wide-Dynamic Range Compression Speed, and Digital Noise Reduction in a Virtual Restaurant Setting.
Ellis GM; Crukley J; Souza PE
Ear Hear; 2024 May-Jun 01; 45(3):760-774. PubMed ID: 38254265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interactions Between Digital Noise Reduction and Reverberation: Acoustic and Behavioral Effects.
Reinhart P; Zahorik P; Souza P
J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 31267958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acceptable noise level as a measure of directional hearing aid benefit.
Freyaldenhoven MC; Nabelek AK; Burchfield SB; Thelin JW
J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Apr; 16(4):228-36. PubMed ID: 16050333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of Digital Noise Reduction in Hearing Aids on Speech Intelligibility in Both Quiet and Noisy Environments.
Deniz B; Gülmez ZD; Kara H; Kara E
Noise Health; 2024 Apr-Jun 01; 26(121):220-225. PubMed ID: 38904826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An environment-adaptive management algorithm for hearing-support devices incorporating listening situation and noise type classifiers.
Yook S; Nam KW; Kim H; Hong SH; Jang DP; Kim IY
Artif Organs; 2015 Apr; 39(4):361-8. PubMed ID: 25284135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings.
Hornsby BW; Ricketts TA
Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17496669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acceptable noise level (ANL) with Danish and non-semantic speech materials in adult hearing-aid users.
Olsen SØ; Lantz J; Nielsen LH; Brännström KJ
Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):678-88. PubMed ID: 22731922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Subjective and objective evaluation of noise management algorithms.
Peeters H; Kuk F; Lau CC; Keenan D
J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Feb; 20(2):89-98. PubMed ID: 19927672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acceptable noise levels in preschool children with normal hearing.
Bryan MF; Franklin C; Ware KS; Horne R
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):823-31; quiz 891-2. PubMed ID: 24224989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
