These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16959734)

  • 1. New perspectives on assessing amplification effects.
    Souza PE; Tremblay KL
    Trends Amplif; 2006 Sep; 10(3):119-43. PubMed ID: 16959734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of Directional Microphone and Noise Reduction on Subcortical and Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials in Older Listeners With Hearing Loss.
    Slugocki C; Kuk F; Korhonen P
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1282-1293. PubMed ID: 32058351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory acclimatization and hearing aids: late auditory evoked potentials and speech recognition following unilateral and bilateral amplification.
    Dawes P; Munro KJ; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jun; 135(6):3560-9. PubMed ID: 24907819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cortical encoding of speech acoustics: Effects of noise and amplification.
    Kuruvilla-Mathew A; Purdy SC; Welch D
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(11):852-64. PubMed ID: 26203722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech evoked potentials: from the laboratory to the clinic.
    Martin BA; Tremblay KL; Korczak P
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):285-313. PubMed ID: 18453883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High-frequency audibility: the effects of audiometric configuration, stimulus type, and device.
    Kimlinger C; McCreery R; Lewis D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Feb; 26(2):128-37. PubMed ID: 25690773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech Auditory Brainstem Response through hearing aid stimulation.
    Bellier L; Veuillet E; Vesson JF; Bouchet P; Caclin A; Thai-Van H
    Hear Res; 2015 Jul; 325():49-54. PubMed ID: 25828076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An objective measure for selecting microphone modes in OMNI/DIR hearing aid circuits.
    Grant KW; Elhilali M; Shamma SA; Walden BE; Surr RK; Cord MT; Summers V
    Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):199-213. PubMed ID: 18595186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural representation of amplified speech sounds.
    Tremblay KL; Billings CJ; Friesen LM; Souza PE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):93-103. PubMed ID: 16518138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf.
    Faulkner A; Walliker JR; Howard IS; Ball V; Fourcin AJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of a "direct-comparison" approach to automatic switching in omnidirectional/directional hearing aids.
    Summers V; Grant KW; Walden BE; Cord MT; Surr RK; Elhilali M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Oct; 19(9):708-20. PubMed ID: 19418710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of speech discrimination in noise and directional hearing with 2 different sound processors of a bone-anchored hearing system in adults with unilateral severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss.
    Wesarg T; Aschendorff A; Laszig R; Beck R; Schild C; Hassepass F; Kroeger S; Hocke T; Arndt S
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1064-70. PubMed ID: 23856626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fitting Frequency-Lowering Signal Processing Applying the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guideline: Updates and Protocols.
    Scollie S; Glista D; Seto J; Dunn A; Schuett B; Hawkins M; Pourmand N; Parsa V
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Mar; 27(3):219-236. PubMed ID: 26967363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Set of Time-and-Frequency-Localized Short-Duration Speech-Like Stimuli for Assessing Hearing-Aid Performance via Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials.
    Stone MA; Visram A; Harte JM; Munro KJ
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519885568. PubMed ID: 31858885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech recognition for bilaterally asymmetric and symmetric hearing aid microphone modes in simulated classroom environments.
    Ricketts TA; Picou EM
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 23524508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech recognition in noise using bilateral open-fit hearing aids: the limited benefit of directional microphones and noise reduction.
    Magnusson L; Claesson A; Persson M; Tengstrand T
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jan; 52(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 22928919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses as an Objective Aided Outcome Measure: Effect of Stimulus Level, Bandwidth, and Amplification in Adults With Hearing Loss.
    Easwar V; Purcell DW; Aiken SJ; Parsa V; Scollie SD
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):635-52. PubMed ID: 26226606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.