These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16959734)

  • 21. On a reference-free speech quality estimator for hearing aids.
    Suelzle D; Parsa V; Falk TH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL412-8. PubMed ID: 23656102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
    Lin LM; Bowditch S; Anderson MJ; May B; Cox KM; Niparko JK
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Speech understanding in noise with an eyeglass hearing aid: asymmetric fitting and the head shadow benefit of anterior microphones.
    Mens LH
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 21047292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Directional hearing aid based on array technology.
    Soede W; Bilsen FA; Berkhout AJ; Verschuure J
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():20-7. PubMed ID: 8153561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Trimodal speech perception: how residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear-implant consonant recognition in the presence of visual cues.
    Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JG
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e99-112. PubMed ID: 25514796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Stimulus level effects on speech-evoked obligatory cortical auditory evoked potentials in infants with normal hearing.
    Purdy SC; Sharma M; Munro KJ; Morgan CL
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 Mar; 124(3):474-80. PubMed ID: 23117114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessment of auditory discrimination in hearing-impaired patients.
    Legris E; Gomot M; Charpentier J; Aoustin JM; Aussedat C; Bakhos D
    Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis; 2018 Oct; 135(5):335-339. PubMed ID: 29709388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables.
    Digeser FM; Wohlberedt T; Hoppe U
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 19672195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Acceptable noise level as a predictor of hearing aid use.
    Nabelek AK; Freyaldenhoven MC; Tampas JW; Burchfiel SB; Muenchen RA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2006 Oct; 17(9):626-39. PubMed ID: 17039765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hearing aid microphone location effects on speech discrimination in noise.
    Franks JR; Feth LL; Daniloff RG
    Ear Hear; 1981; 2(6):241-50. PubMed ID: 7308598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Acclimatization to hearing aids.
    Dawes P; Munro KJ; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):203-12. PubMed ID: 24351612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Acoustical and Perceptual Comparison of Noise Reduction and Compression in Hearing Aids.
    Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Aug; 58(4):1363-76. PubMed ID: 26090648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cortical Auditory Evoked Potential: evaluation of speech detection in adult hearing aid users.
    Durante AS; Wieselberg MB; Carvalho S; Costa N; Pucci B; Gudayol N; Almeida Kd
    Codas; 2014; 26(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 25388069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Speech understanding in quiet and in noise with the bone-anchored hearing aids Baha Compact and Baha Divino.
    Kompis M; Krebs M; Häusler R
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Aug; 127(8):829-35. PubMed ID: 17762993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Integrating a remote microphone with hearing-aid processing.
    Kates JM; Arehart KH; Harvey LO
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jun; 145(6):3551. PubMed ID: 31255148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Recorded From Nucleus Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.
    Brown CJ; Jeon EK; Chiou LK; Kirby B; Karsten SA; Turner CW; Abbas PJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):723-32. PubMed ID: 26295607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Improved speech reception and sound quality with the DUET2 audio processor for electric acoustic stimulation.
    Kleine Punte A; Mertens G; Cochet E; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2015; 135(10):1022-9. PubMed ID: 26073650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of a carrier phrase on hearing aid amplification of single words in quiet.
    Versfeld NJ; Goverts ST
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Mar; 52(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 23153251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.