These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16959734)

  • 41. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. An examination of speech reception thresholds measured in a simulated reverberant cafeteria environment.
    Best V; Keidser G; Buchholz JM; Freeston K
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(10):682-90. PubMed ID: 25853616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Hearing aid accessories for adults: the remote FM microphone.
    Boothroyd A
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 14770015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Cortical Evoked Potentials and Hearing Aids in Individuals with Auditory Dys-Synchrony.
    Yuvaraj P; Mannarukrishnaiah J
    J Int Adv Otol; 2015 Dec; 11(3):236-42. PubMed ID: 26915156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Using a signal cancellation technique to assess adaptive directivity of hearing aids.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):496-511. PubMed ID: 17614507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
    Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The effect of hearing aid signal-processing schemes on acceptable noise levels: perception and prediction.
    Wu YH; Stangl E
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):333-41. PubMed ID: 23334355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The effects of hearing impairment and aging on spatial processing.
    Glyde H; Cameron S; Dillon H; Hickson L; Seeto M
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 22941406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Design and preliminary testing of a visually guided hearing aid.
    Kidd G; Favrot S; Desloge JG; Streeter TM; Mason CR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):EL202-7. PubMed ID: 23464129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Understanding compression: modeling the effects of dynamic-range compression in hearing aids.
    Kates JM
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):395-409. PubMed ID: 20225931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Auditory Acclimatization to Bilateral Hearing Aids: Effects on Sentence-in-Noise Processing Times and Speech-Evoked Potentials.
    Habicht J; Finke M; Neher T
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):161-171. PubMed ID: 28777230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
    Picou EM; Aspell E; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 24518429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effects of noise, nonlinear processing, and linear filtering on perceived speech quality.
    Arehart KH; Kates JM; Anderson MC
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):420-36. PubMed ID: 20440116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effect of Stimulus Level and Bandwidth on Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses in Adults With Normal Hearing.
    Easwar V; Purcell DW; Aiken SJ; Parsa V; Scollie SD
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):619-34. PubMed ID: 26226607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Wind noise in hearing aids with directional and omnidirectional microphones: Polar characteristics of custom-made hearing aids.
    Chung K; McKibben N; Mongeau L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2529-42. PubMed ID: 20370035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The neural representation of consonant-vowel transitions in adults who wear hearing AIDS.
    Tremblay KL; Kalstein L; Billings CJ; Souza PE
    Trends Amplif; 2006 Sep; 10(3):155-62. PubMed ID: 16959736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Representation of amplified speech at cortical level in good and poor hearing aid performers.
    Shetty HN; Puttabasappa M
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2020; 86(5):558-567. PubMed ID: 31122881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Why Do Hearing Aids Fail to Restore Normal Auditory Perception?
    Lesica NA
    Trends Neurosci; 2018 Apr; 41(4):174-185. PubMed ID: 29449017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Relationship between objective measures of hearing discrimination elicited by non-linguistic stimuli and speech perception in adults.
    Sohier H; Bardy F; Ching TYC
    Sci Rep; 2021 Oct; 11(1):19554. PubMed ID: 34599244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Subcortical frequency-coding errors are linked to speaker-variability intolerance in normal-hearing adults.
    Jeng FC; Lee CY; McDonald TN; Ganch HM; Teets EA; Hart BN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Sep; 142(3):EL270. PubMed ID: 28964068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.