These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16959736)

  • 41. [Speech audiometry with logatomes].
    Welge-Lüssen A; Hauser R; Erdmann J; Schwob C; Probst R
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 Feb; 76(2):57-64. PubMed ID: 9172631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Neural representation of amplified speech sounds.
    Tremblay KL; Billings CJ; Friesen LM; Souza PE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):93-103. PubMed ID: 16518138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The role of consonant-vowel amplitude ratio in the recognition of voiceless stop consonants by listeners with hearing impairment.
    Sammeth CA; Dorman MF; Stearns CJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Feb; 42(1):42-55. PubMed ID: 10025542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Speech perception enhancement in elderly hearing aid users using an auditory training program for mobile devices.
    Yu J; Jeon H; Song C; Han W
    Geriatr Gerontol Int; 2017 Jan; 17(1):61-68. PubMed ID: 26628069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Listener Performance with a Novel Hearing Aid Frequency Lowering Technique.
    Kirby BJ; Kopun JG; Spratford M; Mollak CM; Brennan MA; McCreery RW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Oct; 28(9):810-822. PubMed ID: 28972470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Difference in Speech Recognition between a Default and Programmed Telecoil Program.
    Ledda KT; Valente M; Oeding K; Kallogjeri D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jun; 30(6):502-515. PubMed ID: 30461405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effect of pre-transition stimulus duration on acoustic change complex.
    Ganapathy MK; Narne VK; Kalaiah MK; Manjula P
    Int J Audiol; 2013 May; 52(5):350-9. PubMed ID: 23343242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Cortical evoked response to gaps in noise: within-channel and across-channel conditions.
    Lister JJ; Maxfield ND; Pitt GJ
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):862-78. PubMed ID: 17982372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
    Oates PA; Kurtzberg D; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2002 Oct; 23(5):399-415. PubMed ID: 12411773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The Effect of Conventional and Transparent Surgical Masks on Speech Understanding in Individuals with and without Hearing Loss.
    Atcherson SR; Mendel LL; Baltimore WJ; Patro C; Lee S; Pousson M; Spann MJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Jan; 28(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 28054912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effects of various articulatory features of speech on cortical event-related potentials and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
    Korczak PA; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):491-504. PubMed ID: 20453651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Vowel identification by listeners with hearing impairment in response to variation in formant frequencies.
    Molis MR; Leek MR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Aug; 54(4):1211-23. PubMed ID: 21297168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Timbre and speech perception in bimodal and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.
    Kong YY; Mullangi A; Marozeau J
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):645-59. PubMed ID: 22677814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Auditory cortical activity to different voice onset times in cochlear implant users.
    Han JH; Zhang F; Kadis DS; Houston LM; Samy RN; Smith ML; Dimitrijevic A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1603-1617. PubMed ID: 26616545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effects of noise and cue enhancement on neural responses to speech in auditory midbrain, thalamus and cortex.
    Cunningham J; Nicol T; King C; Zecker SG; Kraus N
    Hear Res; 2002 Jul; 169(1-2):97-111. PubMed ID: 12121743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The time course of acoustic/phonemic cue integration in the sensorineurally hearing-impaired listener.
    Schum DJ; Collins MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Jun; 87(6):2716-28. PubMed ID: 2373805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Temporal intraspeech masking of plosive bursts: effects of hearing loss and frequency shaping.
    Mackersie CL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 50(3):554-63. PubMed ID: 17538099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effects of nonlinear frequency compression on Mandarin speech and sound-quality perception in hearing-aid users.
    Chen X; You Y; Yang J; Qian J; Lu Q; Kuehnel V; Rehmann J; Liu B; Xu L
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Jul; 59(7):524-533. PubMed ID: 32441563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effects of audibility and multichannel wide dynamic range compression on consonant recognition for listeners with severe hearing loss.
    Davies-Venn E; Souza P; Brennan M; Stecker GC
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):494-504. PubMed ID: 19633563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A psychophysical evaluation of spectral enhancement.
    DiGiovanni JJ; Nelson PB; Schlauch RS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1121-35. PubMed ID: 16411801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.