653 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1696017)
1. Comparing scores on the Stanford-Binet, Fourth Edition with the WISC-R for exceptional children.
Hollinger CL; Baldwin C
Psychol Rep; 1990 Jun; 66(3 Pt 1):979-84. PubMed ID: 1696017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Stanford-Binet, Fourth Edition: a small study of concurrent validity.
Hollinger CL; Baldwin C
Psychol Rep; 1990 Jun; 66(3 Pt 2):1331-6. PubMed ID: 2385722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stanford-Binet, Fourth Edition and the WISC--R for children in the lower range of intelligence.
Lukens J
Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Jun; 70(3 Pt 1):819-22. PubMed ID: 2377415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. IQ discrepancies between the Binet and WISC-R in children with developmental problems.
Bloom AS; Reese A; Altshuler L; Meckler CL; Raskin LM
J Clin Psychol; 1983 Jul; 39(4):600-3. PubMed ID: 6875001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of preschoolers at-risk with the WPPSI--R and the Stanford-Binet L-M.
Gerken KC; Hodapp AF
Psychol Rep; 1992 Oct; 71(2):659-64. PubMed ID: 1410125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relationships between scores on Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence--Revised and Stanford-Binet IV.
Carvajal HH; Parks JP; Bays KJ; Logan RA; Lujano CI; Page GL; Weaver KA
Psychol Rep; 1991 Aug; 69(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 1961799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlations between scores on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-III and the General Purpose Abbreviated Battery of the Stanford-Binet IV.
Carvajal HH; Hayes JE; Lackey KL; Rathke ML; Wiebe DA; Weaver KA
Psychol Rep; 1993 Jun; 72(3 Pt 2):1167-70. PubMed ID: 8337322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intellectual evaluations of children using human figure drawings: an empirical investigation of two methods.
Abell SC; von Briesen PD; Watz LS
J Clin Psychol; 1996 Jan; 52(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 8682914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The assessment of developmentally disabled children with the WISC-R, Binet and other tests.
Raskin LM; Bloom AS; Klee SH; Reese A
J Clin Psychol; 1978 Jan; 34(1):111-4. PubMed ID: 76637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationship of scores on PPVT-R and WISC-R with special education children and youth.
Candler AC; Maddux CD; Johnson DL
Percept Mot Skills; 1986 Apr; 62(2):417-8. PubMed ID: 3503246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A validity study of the Stanford-Binet: Fourth Edition with students with learning disabilities.
Smith DK; St Martin ME; Lyon MA
J Learn Disabil; 1989 Apr; 22(4):260-1. PubMed ID: 2738463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. External validity of the profile variability index for the K-ABC, Stanford-Binet, and WISC-R: another cul de-sac.
Kline RB; Snyder J; Guilmette S; Castellanos M
J Learn Disabil; 1993 Oct; 26(8):557-67. PubMed ID: 8245701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Kaufman's short form of the McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities and the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales--Fourth Edition.
Karr SK; Carvajal H; Palmer BL
Percept Mot Skills; 1992 Jun; 74(3 Pt 2):1120-2. PubMed ID: 1501979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relationships between scores on Stanford-Binet IV and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised.
Carvajal H; Weyand K
Psychol Rep; 1986 Oct; 59(2 Pt 2):963-6. PubMed ID: 3809352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Incremental validity of WISC-IV(UK) factor index scores with a referred Irish sample: predicting performance on the WIAT-II(UK.).
Canivez GL; Watkins MW; James T; Good R; James K
Br J Educ Psychol; 2014 Dec; 84(Pt 4):667-84. PubMed ID: 25185753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stanford-Binet: Fourth Edition short forms with underachieving and learning disabled students.
Lawson TT; Evans LD
Psychol Rep; 1996 Aug; 79(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 8873787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability and validity of ratio developmental quotients from the Cattell Infant Intelligence Scale.
Atkinson L
Am J Ment Retard; 1990 Sep; 95(2):215-9. PubMed ID: 1699557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differential validity of the K-ABC for lower functioning preschool children versus those of higher ability.
Bloom AS; Allard AM; Zelko FA; Brill WJ; Topinka CW; Pfohl W
Am J Ment Retard; 1988 Nov; 93(3):273-7. PubMed ID: 3228519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of PPVT-R and WISC-R in a mild/moderate handicapped sample.
Beck FW; Black FL
Percept Mot Skills; 1986 Jun; 62(3):891-4. PubMed ID: 3725526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Construct validity of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children with mildly mentally retarded students.
Obrzut A; Nelson RB; Obrzut JE
Am J Ment Defic; 1987 Jul; 92(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 3618659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
