113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16960191)
1. The human tissue act.
Furness PN
BMJ; 2006 Sep; 333(7567):512. PubMed ID: 16960191
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ownership of human tissue and the law.
Skene L
Nat Rev Genet; 2002 Feb; 3(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 11836508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Consent and nothing but consent? The organ retention scandal.
Sheach Leith VM
Sociol Health Illn; 2007 Nov; 29(7):1023-42. PubMed ID: 18092981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Beyond organ retention: the new human tissue bill.
Ellis I
Lancet; 2004 Dec; 364 Suppl 1():s42-3. PubMed ID: 15967149
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Retained organs.
Retained Organs Commission
Bull Med Ethics; 2002 Mar; (176):8-11. PubMed ID: 12408122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. New bill will regulate the retention of tissue.
Dyer C
BMJ; 2003 Dec; 327(7427):1304. PubMed ID: 14656815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Human tissue legislation: listening to the professionals.
Campbell AV; McLean SA; Gutridge K; Harper H
J Med Ethics; 2008 Feb; 34(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 18234949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Consent for childhood cancer tissue banking in the UK: the effect of the Human Tissue Act 2004.
McHale J; Habiba M; Dixon-Woods M; Cavers D; Heney D; Pritchard-Jones K
Lancet Oncol; 2007 Mar; 8(3):266-72. PubMed ID: 17329197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact on histopathology practice of new human tissue legislation in the UK.
Underwood JC
Histopathology; 2006 Sep; 49(3):221-8. PubMed ID: 16918968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tissue banking in a regulated environment--does this help the patient? Part 1--Legislation, regulation and ethics in the UK.
Clark BJ
Pathobiology; 2007; 74(4):218-22. PubMed ID: 17709963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tissue banking in a regulated environment--does this help the patient? Part 2--Patient views and expectations (including the EUROPA DONNA Forum UK position).
Borisch B
Pathobiology; 2007; 74(4):223-6. PubMed ID: 17709964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The new regulation of non-consensual genetic analysis in New Zealand.
Elkin K
J Law Med; 2008 Oct; 16(2):246-62. PubMed ID: 19010003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Autopsy at the crossroads.
Lancet; 2006 May; 367(9521):1460. PubMed ID: 16679140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Consent requirements for necropsy may change in UK.
Bradbury J; Weber W
Lancet; 1999 Dec; 354(9195):2055. PubMed ID: 10636380
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Who's guarding safety of human tissue?
OR Manager; 2006 Aug; 22(8):21, 23. PubMed ID: 16933449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Implications of the Human Tissue Act (2004) on tissue storage for UK plastic surgeons.
Patel AJ
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2009 Aug; 62(8):983-5. PubMed ID: 19608117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. UK necropsy guidelines updated in wake of organ-retention scandals.
Ashraf H
Lancet; 2000 Mar; 355(9209):1083. PubMed ID: 10744103
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Rules for donations to tissue banks--what next?
Glantz L; Roche P; Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 2008 Jan; 358(3):298-303. PubMed ID: 18199870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Human Tissue Bill: good for consent but is it good for patients?
Barth JH
Ann Clin Biochem; 2004 Jul; 41(Pt 4):257. PubMed ID: 15298735
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Tissue banks trigger worry about ownership issues.
Schmidt C
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Sep; 98(17):1174-5. PubMed ID: 16954465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
