These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. An assessment of aquifer storage recovery using ground water flow models. Lowry CS; Anderson MP Ground Water; 2006; 44(5):661-7. PubMed ID: 16961487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transboundary flow modeling: the Zohor depression of Austria and the Slovak Republic. Fendek M; Fendekova M Ground Water; 2005; 43(5):717-21. PubMed ID: 16149967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modeling of flow and contaminant transport in coupled stream-aquifer systems. Hussein M; Schwartz FW J Contam Hydrol; 2003 Aug; 65(1-2):41-64. PubMed ID: 12855200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interpretation of injection-withdrawal tracer experiments conducted between two wells in a large single fracture. Novakowski KS; Bickerton G; Lapcevic P J Contam Hydrol; 2004 Sep; 73(1-4):227-47. PubMed ID: 15336796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An assembly model for simulation of large-scale ground water flow and transport. Huang J; Christ JA; Goltz MN Ground Water; 2008; 46(6):882-92. PubMed ID: 18715260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An improved approach for assigning pumping rates to heterogeneous aquifer models. Pinales A; Chavez A; Llerar G; Manzanares L; Keer A Ground Water; 2005; 43(2):274-9. PubMed ID: 15819949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Uniform head in horizontal and vertical wells. Steward DR; Jin W Ground Water; 2006; 44(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 16405471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Solute transport in crystalline rocks at Aspö--I: geological basis and model calibration. Mazurek M; Jakob A; Bossart P J Contam Hydrol; 2003 Mar; 61(1-4):157-74. PubMed ID: 12598102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Well characteristics influencing arsenic concentrations in ground water. Erickson ML; Barnes RJ Water Res; 2005 Oct; 39(16):4029-39. PubMed ID: 16135378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Temporal changes in the vertical distribution of flow and chloride in deep wells. Izbicki JA; Christensen AH; Newhouse MW; Smith GA; Hanson RT Ground Water; 2005; 43(4):531-44. PubMed ID: 16029179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved water table dynamics in MODFLOW. Clemo T Ground Water; 2005; 43(2):270-3. PubMed ID: 15819948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Approximate solution for solute transport during spherical-flow push-pull tests. Schroth MH; Istok JD Ground Water; 2005; 43(2):280-4. PubMed ID: 15819950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of well hydraulics on the spatial distribution of well incrustations. Houben GJ Ground Water; 2006; 44(5):668-75. PubMed ID: 16961488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of steady ground water flow toward wells in a confined-unconfined aquifer. Chong-Xi C; Li-Tang H; Xu-Sheng W Ground Water; 2006; 44(4):609-12. PubMed ID: 16857040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A real-time, interactive steering environment for integrated ground water modeling. Li SG; Liu Q Ground Water; 2006; 44(5):758-63. PubMed ID: 16961499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Heterogeneity and thermal modeling of ground water. Ferguson G Ground Water; 2007; 45(4):485-90. PubMed ID: 17600579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The vertical hydraulic conductivity of an aquitard at two spatial scales. Hart DJ; Bradbury KR; Feinstein DT Ground Water; 2006; 44(2):201-11. PubMed ID: 16556202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pulsed pumping process optimization using a potential flow model. Tenney CM; Lastoskie CM J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Aug; 93(1-4):111-21. PubMed ID: 17350717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]