These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16961487)

  • 1. An assessment of aquifer storage recovery using ground water flow models.
    Lowry CS; Anderson MP
    Ground Water; 2006; 44(5):661-7. PubMed ID: 16961487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiscale characterization of a heterogeneous aquifer using an ASR operation.
    Pavelic P; Dillon PJ; Simmons CT
    Ground Water; 2006; 44(2):155-64. PubMed ID: 16556198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling effects of multinode wells on solute transport.
    Konikow LF; Hornberger GZ
    Ground Water; 2006; 44(5):648-60. PubMed ID: 16961486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ground water budget analysis and cross-formational leakage in an arid basin.
    Hutchison WR; Hibbs BJ
    Ground Water; 2008; 46(3):384-95. PubMed ID: 18384598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transboundary flow modeling: the Zohor depression of Austria and the Slovak Republic.
    Fendek M; Fendekova M
    Ground Water; 2005; 43(5):717-21. PubMed ID: 16149967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling of flow and contaminant transport in coupled stream-aquifer systems.
    Hussein M; Schwartz FW
    J Contam Hydrol; 2003 Aug; 65(1-2):41-64. PubMed ID: 12855200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fracture control of ground water flow and water chemistry in a rock aquitard.
    Eaton TT; Anderson MP; Bradbury KR
    Ground Water; 2007; 45(5):601-15. PubMed ID: 17760586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Revisiting a classification scheme for U.S.-Mexico alluvial basin-fill aquifers.
    Hibbs BJ; Darling BK
    Ground Water; 2005; 43(5):750-63. PubMed ID: 16149972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A real-time, interactive steering environment for integrated ground water modeling.
    Li SG; Liu Q
    Ground Water; 2006; 44(5):758-63. PubMed ID: 16961499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Approximate solution for solute transport during spherical-flow push-pull tests.
    Schroth MH; Istok JD
    Ground Water; 2005; 43(2):280-4. PubMed ID: 15819950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An Aquifer Storage and Recovery system with reclaimed wastewater to preserve native groundwater resources in El Paso, Texas.
    Sheng Z
    J Environ Manage; 2005 Jun; 75(4):367-77. PubMed ID: 15854729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Metaphors and models: the ASR bubble in the Floridan aquifer.
    Vacher HL; Hutchings WC; Budd DA
    Ground Water; 2006; 44(2):144-54. PubMed ID: 16556197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implications of rate-limited mass transfer for aquifer storage and recovery.
    Culkin SL; Singha K; Day-Lewis FD
    Ground Water; 2008; 46(4):591-605. PubMed ID: 18331329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Heterogeneity and thermal modeling of ground water.
    Ferguson G
    Ground Water; 2007; 45(4):485-90. PubMed ID: 17600579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating hydraulic properties using a moving-model approach and multiple aquifer tests.
    Halford KJ; Yobbi D
    Ground Water; 2006; 44(2):284-91. PubMed ID: 16556210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling ground water flow in alluvial mountainous catchments on a watershed scale.
    Wolf J; Barthel R; Braun J
    Ground Water; 2008; 46(5):695-705. PubMed ID: 18459959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An improved approach for assigning pumping rates to heterogeneous aquifer models.
    Pinales A; Chavez A; Llerar G; Manzanares L; Keer A
    Ground Water; 2005; 43(2):274-9. PubMed ID: 15819949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relative Recovery of Thermal Energy and Fresh Water in Aquifer Storage and Recovery Systems.
    Miotliński K; Dillon PJ
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(6):877-84. PubMed ID: 25399802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analytical solution to transport in three-dimensional heterogeneous well capture zones.
    Indelman P; Lessoff SC; Dagan G
    J Contam Hydrol; 2006 Sep; 87(1-2):1-21. PubMed ID: 16844264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hydrogeophysical methods for analyzing aquifer storage and recovery systems.
    Minsley BJ; Ajo-Franklin J; Mukhopadhyay A; Morgan FD
    Ground Water; 2011; 49(2):250-69. PubMed ID: 20180865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.