These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16962630)

  • 1. Biodegradation of persistent polar pollutants in wastewater: comparison of an optimised lab-scale membrane bioreactor and activated sludge treatment.
    Bernhard M; Müller J; Knepper TP
    Water Res; 2006 Oct; 40(18):3419-28. PubMed ID: 16962630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fate and distribution of pharmaceuticals in wastewater and sewage sludge of the conventional activated sludge (CAS) and advanced membrane bioreactor (MBR) treatment.
    Radjenović J; Petrović M; Barceló D
    Water Res; 2009 Feb; 43(3):831-41. PubMed ID: 19091371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of sulfonated and other micropollutants removal in membrane bioreactor and conventional wastewater treatment.
    De Wever H; Weiss S; Reemtsma T; Vereecken J; Müller J; Knepper T; Rörden O; Gonzalez S; Barcelo D; Dolores Hernando M
    Water Res; 2007 Feb; 41(4):935-45. PubMed ID: 17207834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Removal of a broad range of surfactants from municipal wastewater--comparison between membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge treatment.
    González S; Petrovic M; Barceló D
    Chemosphere; 2007 Feb; 67(2):335-43. PubMed ID: 17123581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the behaviour of selected micropollutants in a membrane bioreactor and a conventional wastewater treatment plant.
    Clara M; Strenn B; Ausserleitner M; Kreuzinger N
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(5):29-36. PubMed ID: 15497826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of two treatments for the removal of selected organic micropollutants and bulk organic matter: conventional activated sludge followed by ultrafiltration versus membrane bioreactor.
    Sahar E; Ernst M; Godehardt M; Hein A; Herr J; Kazner C; Melin T; Cikurel H; Aharoni A; Messalem R; Brenner A; Jekel M
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 63(4):733-40. PubMed ID: 21330721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of biological activated carbon (BAC) and membrane bioreactor (MBR) for pollutants removal in drinking water treatment.
    Tian JY; Chen ZL; Liang H; Li X; Wang ZZ; Li GB
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(6):1515-23. PubMed ID: 19759454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microbial adaptation to biodegrade toxic organic micro-pollutants in membrane bioreactor using different sludge sources.
    Boonnorat J; Chiemchaisri C; Chiemchaisri W; Yamamoto K
    Bioresour Technol; 2014 Aug; 165():50-9. PubMed ID: 24791712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The application of membrane bioreactors as decentralised systems for removal of endocrine disrupting chemicals and pharmaceuticals.
    Le-Minh N; Coleman HM; Khan SJ; van Luer Y; Trang TT; Watkins G; Stuetz RM
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(5):1081-8. PubMed ID: 20220228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of advanced treatment technologies for the elimination of pharmaceutical compounds.
    Baumgarten S; Schröder HF; Charwath C; Lange M; Beier S; Pinnekamp J
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(5):1-8. PubMed ID: 17881831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of membrane bioreactor technology for wastewater treatment and reuse in the Mediterranean region: focusing on removal efficiency of non-conventional pollutants.
    Bolzonella D; Fatone F; di Fabio S; Cecchi F
    J Environ Manage; 2010 Dec; 91(12):2424-31. PubMed ID: 20702022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biodegradation by activated sludge and toxicity of tetracycline into a semi-industrial membrane bioreactor.
    Prado N; Ochoa J; Amrane A
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Aug; 100(15):3769-74. PubMed ID: 19162474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Occurrence of benzothiazoles in municipal wastewater and their fate in biological treatment.
    Kloepfer A; Gnirss R; Jekel M; Reemtsma T
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(5):203-8. PubMed ID: 15497849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Elimination and fate of selected micro-organic pollutants in a full-scale anaerobic/anoxic/aerobic process combined with membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater reclamation.
    Xue W; Wu C; Xiao K; Huang X; Zhou H; Tsuno H; Tanaka H
    Water Res; 2010 Dec; 44(20):5999-6010. PubMed ID: 20723962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment - a viable option to reduce the amount of polar pollutants discharged into surface waters?
    Weiss S; Reemtsma T
    Water Res; 2008 Aug; 42(14):3837-47. PubMed ID: 18684484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of residual organic macromolecules produced in biological wastewater treatment processes on removal of pharmaceuticals by NF/RO membranes.
    Kimura K; Iwase T; Kita S; Watanabe Y
    Water Res; 2009 Aug; 43(15):3751-8. PubMed ID: 19564034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combined MBR with photocatalysis/ozonation for bromoamine acid removal.
    Qu YY; Yang Q; Zhou JT; Gou M; Xing LL; Ma F
    Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2009 Dec; 159(3):664-72. PubMed ID: 19140028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Behavior of two differently radiolabelled 17alpha-ethinylestradiols continuously applied to a laboratory-scale membrane bioreactor with adapted industrial activated sludge.
    Cirja M; Zuehlke S; Ivashechkin P; Hollender J; Schäffer A; Corvini PF
    Water Res; 2007 Nov; 41(19):4403-12. PubMed ID: 17617436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison between a submerged membrane bioreactor and a conventional activated sludge system on treating ammonia-bearing inorganic wastewater.
    Gao M; Yang M; Li H; Yang Q; Zhang Y
    J Biotechnol; 2004 Mar; 108(3):265-9. PubMed ID: 15006427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Process efficiency and microbial monitoring in MBR (membrane bioreactor) and CASP (conventional activated sludge process) treatment of tannery wastewater.
    Munz G; Gualtiero M; Salvadori L; Claudia B; Claudio L
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Dec; 99(18):8559-64. PubMed ID: 18499451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.