166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16962630)
1. Biodegradation of persistent polar pollutants in wastewater: comparison of an optimised lab-scale membrane bioreactor and activated sludge treatment.
Bernhard M; Müller J; Knepper TP
Water Res; 2006 Oct; 40(18):3419-28. PubMed ID: 16962630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fate and distribution of pharmaceuticals in wastewater and sewage sludge of the conventional activated sludge (CAS) and advanced membrane bioreactor (MBR) treatment.
Radjenović J; Petrović M; Barceló D
Water Res; 2009 Feb; 43(3):831-41. PubMed ID: 19091371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of sulfonated and other micropollutants removal in membrane bioreactor and conventional wastewater treatment.
De Wever H; Weiss S; Reemtsma T; Vereecken J; Müller J; Knepper T; Rörden O; Gonzalez S; Barcelo D; Dolores Hernando M
Water Res; 2007 Feb; 41(4):935-45. PubMed ID: 17207834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Removal of a broad range of surfactants from municipal wastewater--comparison between membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge treatment.
González S; Petrovic M; Barceló D
Chemosphere; 2007 Feb; 67(2):335-43. PubMed ID: 17123581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the behaviour of selected micropollutants in a membrane bioreactor and a conventional wastewater treatment plant.
Clara M; Strenn B; Ausserleitner M; Kreuzinger N
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(5):29-36. PubMed ID: 15497826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of two treatments for the removal of selected organic micropollutants and bulk organic matter: conventional activated sludge followed by ultrafiltration versus membrane bioreactor.
Sahar E; Ernst M; Godehardt M; Hein A; Herr J; Kazner C; Melin T; Cikurel H; Aharoni A; Messalem R; Brenner A; Jekel M
Water Sci Technol; 2011; 63(4):733-40. PubMed ID: 21330721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of biological activated carbon (BAC) and membrane bioreactor (MBR) for pollutants removal in drinking water treatment.
Tian JY; Chen ZL; Liang H; Li X; Wang ZZ; Li GB
Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(6):1515-23. PubMed ID: 19759454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microbial adaptation to biodegrade toxic organic micro-pollutants in membrane bioreactor using different sludge sources.
Boonnorat J; Chiemchaisri C; Chiemchaisri W; Yamamoto K
Bioresour Technol; 2014 Aug; 165():50-9. PubMed ID: 24791712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The application of membrane bioreactors as decentralised systems for removal of endocrine disrupting chemicals and pharmaceuticals.
Le-Minh N; Coleman HM; Khan SJ; van Luer Y; Trang TT; Watkins G; Stuetz RM
Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(5):1081-8. PubMed ID: 20220228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of advanced treatment technologies for the elimination of pharmaceutical compounds.
Baumgarten S; Schröder HF; Charwath C; Lange M; Beier S; Pinnekamp J
Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(5):1-8. PubMed ID: 17881831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application of membrane bioreactor technology for wastewater treatment and reuse in the Mediterranean region: focusing on removal efficiency of non-conventional pollutants.
Bolzonella D; Fatone F; di Fabio S; Cecchi F
J Environ Manage; 2010 Dec; 91(12):2424-31. PubMed ID: 20702022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biodegradation by activated sludge and toxicity of tetracycline into a semi-industrial membrane bioreactor.
Prado N; Ochoa J; Amrane A
Bioresour Technol; 2009 Aug; 100(15):3769-74. PubMed ID: 19162474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Occurrence of benzothiazoles in municipal wastewater and their fate in biological treatment.
Kloepfer A; Gnirss R; Jekel M; Reemtsma T
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(5):203-8. PubMed ID: 15497849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Elimination and fate of selected micro-organic pollutants in a full-scale anaerobic/anoxic/aerobic process combined with membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater reclamation.
Xue W; Wu C; Xiao K; Huang X; Zhou H; Tsuno H; Tanaka H
Water Res; 2010 Dec; 44(20):5999-6010. PubMed ID: 20723962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment - a viable option to reduce the amount of polar pollutants discharged into surface waters?
Weiss S; Reemtsma T
Water Res; 2008 Aug; 42(14):3837-47. PubMed ID: 18684484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of residual organic macromolecules produced in biological wastewater treatment processes on removal of pharmaceuticals by NF/RO membranes.
Kimura K; Iwase T; Kita S; Watanabe Y
Water Res; 2009 Aug; 43(15):3751-8. PubMed ID: 19564034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combined MBR with photocatalysis/ozonation for bromoamine acid removal.
Qu YY; Yang Q; Zhou JT; Gou M; Xing LL; Ma F
Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2009 Dec; 159(3):664-72. PubMed ID: 19140028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Behavior of two differently radiolabelled 17alpha-ethinylestradiols continuously applied to a laboratory-scale membrane bioreactor with adapted industrial activated sludge.
Cirja M; Zuehlke S; Ivashechkin P; Hollender J; Schäffer A; Corvini PF
Water Res; 2007 Nov; 41(19):4403-12. PubMed ID: 17617436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between a submerged membrane bioreactor and a conventional activated sludge system on treating ammonia-bearing inorganic wastewater.
Gao M; Yang M; Li H; Yang Q; Zhang Y
J Biotechnol; 2004 Mar; 108(3):265-9. PubMed ID: 15006427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Process efficiency and microbial monitoring in MBR (membrane bioreactor) and CASP (conventional activated sludge process) treatment of tannery wastewater.
Munz G; Gualtiero M; Salvadori L; Claudia B; Claudio L
Bioresour Technol; 2008 Dec; 99(18):8559-64. PubMed ID: 18499451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
