These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16962910)

  • 1. Print information to inform decisions about mammography screening participation in 16 countries with population-based programs.
    Zapka JG; Geller BM; Bulliard JL; Fracheboud J; Sancho-Garnier H; Ballard-Barbash R;
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):126-37. PubMed ID: 16962910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An approach to enhance communication about screening mammography in primary care.
    Nekhlyudov L; Braddock CH
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2009 Sep; 18(9):1403-12. PubMed ID: 19708801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Informed decision-making and colorectal cancer screening: is it occurring in primary care?
    Ling BS; Trauth JM; Fine MJ; Mor MK; Resnick A; Braddock CH; Bereknyei S; Weissfeld JL; Schoen RE; Ricci EM; Whittle J
    Med Care; 2008 Sep; 46(9 Suppl 1):S23-9. PubMed ID: 18725829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Informed decision making in the context of prenatal screening.
    van den Berg M; Timmermans DR; ten Kate LP; van Vugt JM; van der Wal G
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):110-7. PubMed ID: 16242899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The 2003 Australian Breast Health Survey: survey design and preliminary results.
    Villanueva EV; Jones S; Nehill C; Favelle S; Steel D; Iverson D; Zorbas H
    BMC Public Health; 2008 Jan; 8():13. PubMed ID: 18194528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Information and involvement preferences of women in their 40s before their first screening mammogram.
    Nekhlyudov L; Li R; Fletcher SW
    Arch Intern Med; 2005 Jun; 165(12):1370-4. PubMed ID: 15983285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cancer screening - pros, cons, choice, and the patient.
    Trevena L
    Aust Fam Physician; 2009 Apr; 38(4):188-92. PubMed ID: 19350066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Screening mammography: a cross-sectional study to compare characteristics of women aged 40 and older from the deep South who are current, overdue, and never screeners.
    Lopez ED; Khoury AJ; Dailey AB; Hall AG; Chisholm LR
    Womens Health Issues; 2009; 19(6):434-45. PubMed ID: 19879455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving comprehension of informed consent.
    Kusec S; Oresković S; Skegro M; Korolija D; Busić Z; Horzić M
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Mar; 60(3):294-300. PubMed ID: 16427762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Personal invitations for population-based breast cancer screening.
    Saalasti-Koskinen U; Mäkelä M; Saarenmaa I; Autti-Rämö I
    Acad Radiol; 2009 May; 16(5):546-50. PubMed ID: 19345895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Participation behaviour following a false positive test in the Copenhagen mammography screening programme.
    Andersen SB; Vejborg I; von Euler-Chelpin M
    Acta Oncol; 2008; 47(4):550-5. PubMed ID: 18465321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Presenting health risk information in different formats: the effect on participants' cognitive and emotional evaluation and decisions.
    Timmermans DR; Ockhuysen-Vermey CF; Henneman L
    Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Dec; 73(3):443-7. PubMed ID: 18722073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prostate cancer screening decisions: results from the National Survey of Medical Decisions (DECISIONS study).
    Hoffman RM; Couper MP; Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Levin CA; McNaughton-Collins M; Helitzer DL; VanHoewyk J; Barry MJ
    Arch Intern Med; 2009 Sep; 169(17):1611-8. PubMed ID: 19786681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Women's anxieties caused by false positives in mammography screening: a contingent valuation survey.
    Yasunaga H; Ide H; Imamura T; Ohe K
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jan; 101(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 16821083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Informed decision making: what is its role in cancer screening?
    Rimer BK; Briss PA; Zeller PK; Chan EC; Woolf SH
    Cancer; 2004 Sep; 101(5 Suppl):1214-28. PubMed ID: 15316908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Informed consent: providing information about prenatal examinations.
    Dahl K; Kesmodel U; Hvidman L; Olesen F
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(12):1420-5. PubMed ID: 17260215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How do we achieve informed choice for women considering breast screening?
    Hersch J; Jansen J; Irwig L; Barratt A; Thornton H; Howard K; McCaffery K
    Prev Med; 2011 Sep; 53(3):144-6. PubMed ID: 21723312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Decisions about Pap tests: what influences women and providers?
    Fiebig DG; Haas M; Hossain I; Street DJ; Viney R
    Soc Sci Med; 2009 May; 68(10):1766-74. PubMed ID: 19339094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Mammography screening in Germany: how, when and why?].
    Bick U
    Rofo; 2006 Oct; 178(10):957-69. PubMed ID: 17021975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development and preliminary evaluation of a bowel cancer screening decision aid for adults with lower literacy.
    Smith SK; Trevena L; Barratt A; Dixon A; Nutbeam D; Simpson JM; McCaffery KJ
    Patient Educ Couns; 2009 Jun; 75(3):358-67. PubMed ID: 19272747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.