BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16964363)

  • 1. Extended cooperation in clinical studies through exchange of CDISC metadata between different study software solutions.
    Kuchinke W; Wiegelmann S; Verplancke P; Ohmann C
    Methods Inf Med; 2006; 45(4):441-6. PubMed ID: 16964363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Current applications and future directions for the CDISC Operational Data Model standard: A methodological review.
    Hume S; Aerts J; Sarnikar S; Huser V
    J Biomed Inform; 2016 Apr; 60():352-62. PubMed ID: 26944737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. S2O - A software tool for integrating research data from general purpose statistic software into electronic data capture systems.
    Bruland P; Dugas M
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Jan; 17(1):3. PubMed ID: 28061771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CDISC standard-based electronic archiving of clinical trials.
    Kuchinke W; Aerts J; Semler SC; Ohmann C
    Methods Inf Med; 2009; 48(5):408-13. PubMed ID: 19621114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Standardizing data exchange for clinical research protocols and case report forms: An assessment of the suitability of the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) Operational Data Model (ODM).
    Huser V; Sastry C; Breymaier M; Idriss A; Cimino JJ
    J Biomed Inform; 2015 Oct; 57():88-99. PubMed ID: 26188274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interoperability in clinical research: from metadata registries to semantically annotated CDISC ODM.
    Bruland P; Breil B; Fritz F; Dugas M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 180():564-8. PubMed ID: 22874254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ODM Clinical Data Generator: Syntactically Correct Clinical Data Based on Metadata Definition.
    Brix TJ; Becker L; Harbich T; Oehm J; Fechner M; Dugas M; Storck M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2021 May; 278():35-40. PubMed ID: 34042873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Compatibility Between Metadata Standards: Import Pipeline of CDISC ODM to the Samply.MDR.
    Kock-Schoppenhauer AK; Ulrich H; Wagen-Zink S; Duhm-Harbeck P; Ingenerf J; Neuhaus P; Dugas M; Bruland P
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2018; 247():221-225. PubMed ID: 29677955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automatic Conversion of Metadata from the Study of Health in Pomerania to ODM.
    Hegselmann S; Gessner S; Neuhaus P; Henke J; Schmidt CO; Dugas M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 236():88-96. PubMed ID: 28508783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Global clinical data interchange standards are here!
    Souza T; Kush R; Evans JP
    Drug Discov Today; 2007 Feb; 12(3-4):174-81. PubMed ID: 17275739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Standardising the Development of ODM Converters: The ODMToolBox.
    Soto-Rey I; Neuhaus P; Bruland P; Geßner S; Varghese J; Hegselmann S; Brix T; Dugas M; Storck M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2018; 247():231-235. PubMed ID: 29677957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Converting ODM Metadata to FHIR Questionnaire Resources.
    Doods J; Neuhaus P; Dugas M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 228():456-60. PubMed ID: 27577424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Operational Data Model Conversion to ResearchKit.
    Soto-Rey I; Geßner S; Dugas M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 245():225-229. PubMed ID: 29295087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison and transformation between CDISC ODM and EN13606 EHR standards in connecting EHR data with clinical trial research data.
    Tapuria A; Bruland P; Delaney B; Kalra D; Curcin V
    Digit Health; 2018; 4():2055207618777676. PubMed ID: 29942639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automated Transformation of CDISC ODM to OpenClinica.
    Gessner S; Storck M; Hegselmann S; Dugas M; Soto-Rey I
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 243():95-99. PubMed ID: 28883178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of an open metadata schema for prospective clinical research (openPCR) in China.
    Xu W; Guan Z; Sun J; Wang Z; Geng Y
    Methods Inf Med; 2014; 53(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 24317371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Future developments of medical informatics from the viewpoint of networked clinical research. Interoperability and integration.
    Ohmann C; Kuchinke W
    Methods Inf Med; 2009; 48(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 19151883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Concept for a Data Dictionary System Supporting for Clinical Research.
    Strickler M; Zbinden C; Saccilotto R; Denecke K
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2019; 258():158-162. PubMed ID: 30942736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multilingual Medical Data Models in ODM Format: A Novel Form-based Approach to Semantic Interoperability between Routine Healthcare and Clinical Research.
    Breil B; Kenneweg J; Fritz F; Bruland P; Doods D; Trinczek B; Dugas M
    Appl Clin Inform; 2012; 3(3):276-89. PubMed ID: 23620720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A pragmatic method for transforming clinical research data from the research electronic data capture "REDCap" to Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) Study Data Tabulation Model (SDTM): Development and evaluation of REDCap2SDTM.
    Yamamoto K; Ota K; Akiya I; Shintani A
    J Biomed Inform; 2017 Jun; 70():65-76. PubMed ID: 28487263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.