83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16964629)
1. IRBs: going too far or not far enough?
Vogt TM
Science; 2006 Sep; 313(5792):1388-9; author reply 1388-9. PubMed ID: 16964629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. IRBs: going too far or not far enough?
Felten DL
Science; 2006 Sep; 313(5792):1388-9; author reply 1388-9. PubMed ID: 16959990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. IRBs and the new rule on research with children.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2002 Jan; 17(1):4. PubMed ID: 16270437
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Independent commercial IRBs.
Tandy MK
IRB; 1996; 18(3):10. PubMed ID: 11654408
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Enhancing communication among data monitoring committees and institutional review boards.
Taylor HA; Chaisson L; Sugarman J
Clin Trials; 2008; 5(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 18559418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating IRBs and their roles.
Whitelaw SB
Food Drug Cosmet Med Device Law Dig; 1999 Mar; 16(1):18-20. PubMed ID: 12784813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Institutional review boards (IRBs) and working with adverse event reports.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2005 Dec; 20(12):1-3. PubMed ID: 16607708
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Researcher experiences with IRBs: a survey of members of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology.
Wisner KL; Conley RR; Taylor SF; Kosten T; Rapaport MH; Brown LS
IRB; 2011; 33(5):14-20. PubMed ID: 22043746
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The ins and outs of independent IRBs.
Lis JM; Murray MG
J Health Life Sci Law; 2008 Oct; 2(1):73, 75-122. PubMed ID: 19004298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Public health practice vs research: implications for preparedness and disaster research review by State Health Department IRBs.
Perlman D
Disaster Med Public Health Prep; 2008 Oct; 2(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 18845930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rules of the game: institutional review boards.
Lubowitz JH; Poehling GG; Burkhart SS
Arthroscopy; 2008 Apr; 24(4):373-4. PubMed ID: 18375265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Institutional review board approval-more red tape or a step in the right direction?
Rushton HG
J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):804-5. PubMed ID: 18635239
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Case study: university finally can resume human subjects research again.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2006 Aug; 21(8):6-7. PubMed ID: 17058815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Moving beyond compliance: measuring ethical quality to enhance the oversight of human subjects research.
Taylor HA
IRB; 2007; 29(5):9-14. PubMed ID: 17969778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. How to do human-subjects research if you do not have an institutional review board.
Rice TW
Respir Care; 2008 Oct; 53(10):1362-7. PubMed ID: 18812001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Research ethics boards: no data on quality of for-profit or non-profit IRBs.
Shamoo AE; Woeckner E
PLoS Med; 2006 Oct; 3(10):e459; author reply e460, e471. PubMed ID: 17076572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Office of Human Research Protections.
Chamberlain B
Clin Nurse Spec; 2008; 22(6):268. PubMed ID: 18955842
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The relationship between continuous quality improvement and research.
Barnard C
J Healthc Qual; 2002; 24(2):56; author reply 56-7. PubMed ID: 11942162
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Ethics in a scientific approach: the importance of the biostatistician in research ethics committees.
Atici E; Erdemir AD
J Med Ethics; 2008 Apr; 34(4):297-300. PubMed ID: 18375684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The flip of the coin: exempt, expedited, or full IRB review?
Bliss-Holtz J
AACN Adv Crit Care; 2007; 18(2):213-7. PubMed ID: 17473550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
