BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

491 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16964737)

  • 1. Sound attenuation from earmuffs and earplugs in combination: maximum benefits vs. missed information.
    Abel SM; Odell P
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2006 Sep; 77(9):899-904. PubMed ID: 16964737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Symphony orchestra musicians' use of hearing protection and attenuation of custom-made hearing protectors as measured with two different real-ear attenuation at threshold methods.
    Huttunen KH; Sivonen VP; Poykko VT
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):176-88. PubMed ID: 21368443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech intelligibility and passive, level-dependent earplugs.
    Norin JA; Emanuel DC; Letowski TR
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):642-9. PubMed ID: 21407078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Balancing speech intelligibility versus sound exposure in selection of personal hearing protection equipment for Chinook aircrews.
    Van Wijngaarden SJ; Rots G
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2001 Nov; 72(11):1037-44. PubMed ID: 11718509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Double hearing protection and speech intelligibility-room for improvement.
    Wagstaff AS; Woxen OJ
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2001 Apr; 72(4):400-4. PubMed ID: 11318022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effectiveness of hearing protectors in practice.
    Alberti PW; Riko K; Abel SM; Kristensen R
    J Otolaryngol; 1979 Aug; 8(4):354-9. PubMed ID: 513182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Soft tissue conduction as a possible contributor to the limited attenuation provided by hearing protection devices.
    Chordekar S; Adelman C; Sohmer H; Kishon-Rabin L
    Noise Health; 2016; 18(84):274-279. PubMed ID: 27762257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationship between comfort and attenuation measurements for two types of earplugs.
    Byrne DC; Davis RR; Shaw PB; Specht BM; Holland AN
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):86-92. PubMed ID: 21368433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Temporary changes in hearing after exposure to shooting noise.
    Pawlaczyk-Luszczyńska M; Dudarewicz A; Bak M; Fiszer M; Kotyło P; Sliwińska-Kowalska M
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2004; 17(2):285-93. PubMed ID: 15387085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of noise attenuation and verbal communication capabilities using three ear insert hearing protection systems among airport maintenance personnel.
    Wagoner L; McGlothlin J; Chung K; Strickland E; Zimmerman N; Carlson G
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Feb; 4(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 17175514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hearing in nonprofessional pop/rock musicians.
    Schmuziger N; Patscheke J; Probst R
    Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 16825883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variability of real-world hearing protector attenuation measurements.
    Neitzel R; Somers S; Seixas N
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Oct; 50(7):679-91. PubMed ID: 16782739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Communication and noise. Speech intelligibility of airplane pilots with and without active noise compensation].
    Matschke RG
    HNO; 1994 Aug; 42(8):499-504. PubMed ID: 7960953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Isolating the auditory system from acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging: examination of noise conduction through the ear canal, head, and body.
    Ravicz ME; Melcher JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jan; 109(1):216-31. PubMed ID: 11206150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development and validation of a field microphone-in-real-ear approach for measuring hearing protector attenuation.
    Berger EH; Voix J; Kieper RW; Le Cocq C
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):163-75. PubMed ID: 21368442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory localization in the horizontal plane with single and double hearing protection.
    Brungart DS; Kordik AJ; Simpson BD; McKinley RL
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2003 Sep; 74(9):937-46. PubMed ID: 14503671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory perception with ear and cold weather face protection worn in combination.
    Abel SM; Odell P
    Mil Med; 2006 Oct; 171(10):976-81. PubMed ID: 17076450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The challenge of localizing vehicle backup alarms: effects of passive and electronic hearing protectors, ambient noise level, and backup alarm spectral content.
    Alali KA; Casali JG
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):99-112. PubMed ID: 21368435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Better protection from blasts without sacrificing situational awareness.
    Killion MC; Monroe T; Drambarean V
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50 Suppl 1():S38-45. PubMed ID: 21288067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Oral magnesium supplementation as prophylaxis for noise-induced hearing loss: results of a double blind field study.
    Joachims Z; Netzer A; Ising H; Rebentisch E; Attias J; Weisz G; Günther T
    Schriftenr Ver Wasser Boden Lufthyg; 1993; 88():503-16. PubMed ID: 8460390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.