947 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16964851)
1. An effective method to verify line and point spread functions measured in computed tomography.
Ohkubo M; Wada S; Matsumoto T; Nishizawa K
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2757-64. PubMed ID: 16964851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Determination of point spread function in computed tomography accompanied with verification.
Ohkubo M; Wada S; Ida S; Kunii M; Kayugawa A; Matsumoto T; Nishizawa K; Murao K
Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):2089-97. PubMed ID: 19610298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Evaluation of the accuracy of line spread function (LSF) and point spread function (PSF) measured in the computed tomography.].
Kunii M; Wada S; Ohkubo M; Harata M; Nishizawa K; Matsumoto T
Igaku Butsuri; 2006; 26(2):57-64. PubMed ID: 17164534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spatial resolution improvement and dose reduction potential for inner ear CT imaging using a z-axis deconvolution technique.
McCollough CH; Leng S; Sunnegardh J; Vrieze TJ; Yu L; Lane J; Raupach R; Stierstorfer K; Flohr T
Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):061904. PubMed ID: 23718595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of the blurring of a small object on CT images calculated on the basis of three-dimensional spatial resolution.
Okubo M; Wada S; Saito M
Igaku Butsuri; 2005; 25(3):132-40. PubMed ID: 16373989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Determination of 3D PSFs from computed tomography reconstructed x-ray images of spherical objects and the effects of sphere radii.
Robert N; Mainprize JG; Whyne C
Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):4792-4802. PubMed ID: 31381159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A method for determining the modulation transfer function from thick microwire profiles measured with x-ray microcomputed tomography.
Nakaya Y; Kawata Y; Niki N; Umetatni K; Ohmatsu H; Moriyama N
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4347-64. PubMed ID: 22830768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Image filtering as an alternative to the application of a different reconstruction kernel in CT imaging: feasibility study in lung cancer screening.
Ohkubo M; Wada S; Kayugawa A; Matsumoto T; Murao K
Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):3915-23. PubMed ID: 21858988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Relationship between line spread function (LSF), or slice sensitivity profile (SSP), and point spread function (PSF) in CT image system.].
Ohkubo M; Wada S; Kobayashi T; Lee Y; Tsai DY
Igaku Butsuri; 2004; 24(3):115-22. PubMed ID: 15567911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationship between sharpness and noise in CT images reconstructed with different kernels.
Eldevik K; Nordhøy W; Skretting A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):430-3. PubMed ID: 20181647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Initial phantom study comparing image quality in computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and new adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction v.
Lim K; Kwon H; Cho J; Oh J; Yoon S; Kang M; Ha D; Lee J; Kang E
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(3):443-8. PubMed ID: 25654782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An algorithm for automated modulation transfer function measurement using an edge of a PMMA phantom: Impact of field of view on spatial resolution of CT images.
Anam C; Fujibuchi T; Budi WS; Haryanto F; Dougherty G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 19(6):244-252. PubMed ID: 30338920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control.
Carton AK; Vandenbroucke D; Struye L; Maidment AD; Kao YH; Albert M; Bosmans H; Marchal G
Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1684-95. PubMed ID: 16013727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Towards task-based assessment of CT performance: system and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms.
Richard S; Husarik DB; Yadava G; Murphy SN; Samei E
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4115-22. PubMed ID: 22830744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and validation of segmentation and interpolation techniques in sinograms for metal artifact suppression in CT.
Veldkamp WJ; Joemai RM; van der Molen AJ; Geleijns J
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):620-8. PubMed ID: 20229871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for C-arm mammography tomosynthesis.
Rakowski JT; Dennis MJ
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3018-32. PubMed ID: 16964880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phantom validation of coregistration of PET and CT for image-guided radiotherapy.
Lavely WC; Scarfone C; Cevikalp H; Li R; Byrne DW; Cmelak AJ; Dawant B; Price RR; Hallahan DE; Fitzpatrick JM
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1083-92. PubMed ID: 15191296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Isotope independent determination of PET/CT modulation transfer functions from phantom measurements on spheres.
Prenosil GA; Klaeser B; Hentschel M; Fürstner M; Berndt M; Krause T; Weitzel T
Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5767. PubMed ID: 27782715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of CT-based thickness measurement of thin structures: modeling of limited spatial resolution in all three dimensions.
Prevrhal S; Fox JC; Shepherd JA; Genant HK
Med Phys; 2003 Jan; 30(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 12557971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Model-based PSF and MTF estimation and validation from skeletal clinical CT images.
Pakdel A; Mainprize JG; Robert N; Fialkov J; Whyne CM
Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011906. PubMed ID: 24387514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
