These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

652 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16964880)

  • 1. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for C-arm mammography tomosynthesis.
    Rakowski JT; Dennis MJ
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3018-32. PubMed ID: 16964880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis.
    Wu T; Moore RH; Rafferty EA; Kopans DB
    Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2636-47. PubMed ID: 15487747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimization of the acquisition geometry in digital tomosynthesis of the breast.
    Sechopoulos I; Ghetti C
    Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 36(4):1199-207. PubMed ID: 19472626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implementation and evaluation of an expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm for gamma emission breast tomosynthesis.
    Gong Z; Klanian K; Patel T; Sullivan O; Williams MB
    Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7580-92. PubMed ID: 23231306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative study of limited-angle cone-beam reconstruction methods for breast tomosynthesis.
    Zhang Y; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Wei J; Goodsitt MM; Hadjiiski LM; Ge J; Zhou C
    Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3781-95. PubMed ID: 17089843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison study of reconstruction algorithms for prototype digital breast tomosynthesis using various breast phantoms.
    Kim YS; Park HS; Lee HH; Choi YW; Choi JG; Kim HH; Kim HJ
    Radiol Med; 2016 Feb; 121(2):81-92. PubMed ID: 26383027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging.
    Gong X; Glick SJ; Liu B; Vedula AA; Thacker S
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1041-52. PubMed ID: 16696481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of algorithms for out-of-plane artifacts removal in digital tomosynthesis reconstructions.
    Bliznakova K; Bliznakov Z; Buliev I
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2012 Jul; 107(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 22056810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multigrid reconstruction with block-iterative updates for breast tomosynthesis.
    Michielsen K; Nuyts J
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6537-48. PubMed ID: 26520744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Importance of point-by-point back projection correction for isocentric motion in digital breast tomosynthesis: relevance to morphology of structures such as microcalcifications.
    Chen Y; Lo JY; Dobbins JT
    Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3885-92. PubMed ID: 17985634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
    Shaheen E; Van Ongeval C; Zanca F; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Jacobs J; Young KC; R Dance D; Bosmans H
    Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6659-71. PubMed ID: 22149848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Image quality of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: effects of projection-view distributions.
    Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Goodsitt M; Carson PL; Hadjiiski L; Schmitz A; Eberhard JW; Claus BE
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5703-12. PubMed ID: 21992385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A mathematical model platform for optimizing a multiprojection breast imaging system.
    Chawla AS; Samei E; Saunders RS; Lo JY; Baker JA
    Med Phys; 2008 Apr; 35(4):1337-45. PubMed ID: 18491528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction algorithms using synchrotron radiation in standard geometry.
    Bliznakova K; Kolitsi Z; Speller RD; Horrocks JA; Tromba G; Pallikarakis N
    Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1893-903. PubMed ID: 20443511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital tomosynthesis: technique.
    Yaffe MJ; Mainprize JG
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2014 May; 52(3):489-97. PubMed ID: 24792651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Task-based performance analysis of FBP, SART and ML for digital breast tomosynthesis using signal CNR and Channelised Hotelling Observers.
    Van de Sompel D; Brady SM; Boone J
    Med Image Anal; 2011 Feb; 15(1):53-70. PubMed ID: 20713313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterization of a constrained paired-view technique in iterative reconstruction for breast tomosynthesis.
    Wu G; Mainprize JG; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101901. PubMed ID: 24089903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The quantitative potential for breast tomosynthesis imaging.
    Shafer CM; Samei E; Lo JY
    Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):1004-16. PubMed ID: 20384236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An object-oriented simulator for 3D digital breast tomosynthesis imaging system.
    Seyyedi S; Cengiz K; Kamasak M; Yildirim I
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2013; 2013():250689. PubMed ID: 24371468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of time-efficient reconstruction methods in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Svahn TM; Houssami N
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):331-6. PubMed ID: 25855075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.