BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16965253)

  • 1. On the use of structural equation modeling in health communication research.
    Stephenson MT; Holbert RL; Zimmerman RS
    Health Commun; 2006; 20(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 16965253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The application of structural equation model approach in epidemiological research].
    Yang TZ; Ruan HJ; Li FZ
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Apr; 26(4):297-300. PubMed ID: 15941543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How to use structural equation modeling in medical education research: a brief guide.
    Violato C; Hecker KG
    Teach Learn Med; 2007; 19(4):362-71. PubMed ID: 17935466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing groups on latent variables: a structural equation modeling approach.
    Dimitrov DM
    Work; 2006; 26(4):429-36. PubMed ID: 16788262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of structural equation modeling to health outcomes research.
    Hays RD; Revicki D; Coyne KS
    Eval Health Prof; 2005 Sep; 28(3):295-309. PubMed ID: 16123259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Latent variable modeling of differences and changes with longitudinal data.
    McArdle JJ
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2009; 60():577-605. PubMed ID: 18817479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of structural equation and multidimensional Rasch modeling approaches to Confirmatory Factor Analysis.
    Wolfe EW; Singh K
    J Appl Meas; 2011; 12(3):212-21. PubMed ID: 22357124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Structural equation modeling in pediatric psychology: overview and review of applications.
    Nelson TD; Aylward BS; Steele RG
    J Pediatr Psychol; 2008 Aug; 33(7):679-87. PubMed ID: 17977890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Structural equation modeling: basic concepts and applications in personality assessment research.
    Crowley SL; Fan X
    J Pers Assess; 1997 Jun; 68(3):508-31. PubMed ID: 9170298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. General linear contrasts on latent variable means: structural equation hypothesis tests for multivariate clinical trials.
    Donaldson GW
    Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(18):2893-917. PubMed ID: 12953287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Structural equation modeling of disability in women with fibromyalgia or multiple sclerosis.
    Phillips LJ; Stuifbergen AK
    West J Nurs Res; 2009 Feb; 31(1):89-109. PubMed ID: 19150972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating model fit for growth curve models: Integration of fit indices from SEM and MLM frameworks.
    Wu W; West SG; Taylor AB
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Sep; 14(3):183-201. PubMed ID: 19719357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mediational analysis in HIV/AIDS research: estimating multivariate path analytic models in a structural equation modeling framework.
    Bryan A; Schmiege SJ; Broaddus MR
    AIDS Behav; 2007 May; 11(3):365-83. PubMed ID: 16917669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Confirmatory factor analysis: an introduction for psychosomatic medicine researchers.
    Babyak MA; Green SB
    Psychosom Med; 2010 Jul; 72(6):587-97. PubMed ID: 20467001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with fallible covariates.
    Culpepper SA; Aguinis H
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Jun; 16(2):166-78. PubMed ID: 21517178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exploratory structural equation modeling: an integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.
    Marsh HW; Morin AJ; Parker PD; Kaur G
    Annu Rev Clin Psychol; 2014; 10():85-110. PubMed ID: 24313568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The integration of continuous and discrete latent variable models: potential problems and promising opportunities.
    Bauer DJ; Curran PJ
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Mar; 9(1):3-29. PubMed ID: 15053717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Potential problems with "well fitting" models.
    Tomarken AJ; Waller NG
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2003 Nov; 112(4):578-98. PubMed ID: 14674870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Decomposing model fit: measurement vs. theory in organizational research using latent variables.
    O'Boyle EH; Williams LJ
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Jan; 96(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 20718518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Structural equation modeling with interchangeable dyads.
    Olsen JA; Kenny DA
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Jun; 11(2):127-41. PubMed ID: 16784334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.