99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16965969)
21. Practicing breast imaging in HRT ladies in Thailand.
Bhothisuwan W
J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Oct; 87 Suppl 3():S169-73. PubMed ID: 21213518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Needle localization for nonpalpable breast lesions.
Sailors DM; Crabtree JD; Land RL; Rose WB; Burns RP; Barker DE
Am Surg; 1994 Mar; 60(3):186-9. PubMed ID: 8116978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Analysis of the results of 137 subclinical breast lesions excisions. Value of ultrasonography in the early diagnosis of breast cancer].
Jacob D; Brombart JC; Muller C; Lefèbvre C; Massa F; Depoerck A
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 9091540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Do mammography, sonography, and MR mammography have a diagnostic benefit compared with mammography and sonography?
Müller-Schimpfle M; Stoll P; Stern W; Kurz S; Dammann F; Claussen CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1323-9. PubMed ID: 9129436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Factors associated with one step surgery in case of non-palpable breast cancer.
Schaefer FK; Eden I; Schaefer PJ; Peter D; Jonat W; Heller M; Schreer I
Eur J Radiol; 2007 Dec; 64(3):426-31. PubMed ID: 17386990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Experience with fine-wire localization breast biopsies for nonpalpable breast lesions detected mammographically.
Luoma AA; Scudamore CH; Longley JD
Can J Surg; 1986 Sep; 29(5):315-8. PubMed ID: 3790211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Stereotactic and ultrasound guided fine-needle cytology in nonpalpable breast lesions].
Vielh P; Klijanienko J
Arch Anat Cytol Pathol; 1998; 46(4):237-40. PubMed ID: 9754384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Breast ultrasound.
Ueno E
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1996 Mar; 23 Suppl 1():14-23. PubMed ID: 8702306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Limitations in distinguishing malignant from benign lesions of the breast by systematic review of mammograms.
Monostori Z; Herman PG; Carmody DP; Eacobacci TM; Capece NR; Cruz VM; Gentin S; Vernace FM
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1991 Dec; 173(6):438-42. PubMed ID: 1948599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Multivariate analysis of roentgenologic characteristics and risk factors for nonpalpable carcinoma of the breast.
Harkins K; Tartter PI; Hermann G; Squitieri R; Brower ST; Keller RJ
J Am Coll Surg; 1994 Feb; 178(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 8173725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Mammography and subsequent whole-breast sonography of nonpalpable breast cancers: the importance of radiologic breast density.
Leconte I; Feger C; Galant C; Berlière M; Berg BV; D'Hoore W; Maldague B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jun; 180(6):1675-9. PubMed ID: 12760942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Accuracy of sonographically guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy: results of 715 consecutive breast biopsies with at least two-year follow-up of benign lesions.
Crystal P; Koretz M; Shcharynsky S; Makarov V; Strano S
J Clin Ultrasound; 2005 Feb; 33(2):47-52. PubMed ID: 15674836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Ultrasonography as a guidance method in the evaluation of mammographically detected nonpalpable breast lesions of suspected malignancy.
Rissanen T; Pamilo M; Suramo I
Acta Radiol; 1998 May; 39(3):292-7. PubMed ID: 9571946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Sonographically guided biopsy of suspicious microcalcifications of the breast: a pilot study.
Soo MS; Baker JA; Rosen EL; Vo TT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Apr; 178(4):1007-15. PubMed ID: 11906892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. 201Tl scintigraphy in the evaluation of palpable and nonpalpable breast lesions: correlation with mammography and ultrasonography.
Vural G; Atasever T; Ozdemir A; Oznur I; Karabacak NI; Gökçora N; Işik S; Unlü M
Nuklearmedizin; 1997 Dec; 36(8):282-8. PubMed ID: 17068879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Sonographically guided marker placement for confirmation of removal of mammographically occult lesions after localization.
Mercado CL; Guth AA; Toth HK; Moy L; Axelrod D; Cangiarella J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Oct; 191(4):1216-9. PubMed ID: 18806168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. New sonographic criteria for recommending fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable solid nodules of the thyroid.
Kim EK; Park CS; Chung WY; Oh KK; Kim DI; Lee JT; Yoo HS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Mar; 178(3):687-91. PubMed ID: 11856699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The potential value of mammographically guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions.
Masood S; Frykberg ER; Mitchum DG; McLellan GL; Scalapino MC; Bullard JB
Am Surg; 1989 Apr; 55(4):226-31. PubMed ID: 2705686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Malignant hyperechoic breast lesions at ultrasound: A pictorial essay.
Tiang S; Metcalf C; Dissanayake D; Wylie E
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2016 Aug; 60(4):506-13. PubMed ID: 27216965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Calcifications in breast biopsy specimens: discrepancies in radiologic-pathologic identification.
Stein MA; Karlan MS
Radiology; 1991 Apr; 179(1):111-4. PubMed ID: 2006260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
