These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16966124)
1. Suspicion of intrauterine growth restriction: Use of abdominal circumference alone or estimated fetal weight below 10%. Chauhan SP; Cole J; Sanderson M; Magann EF; Scardo JA J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Sep; 19(9):557-62. PubMed ID: 16966124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Neonatal Outcomes among Fetuses with an Abdominal Circumference <3rd %ile and Estimated Fetal Weight 3rd to 9th %ile Compared to Fetuses with an EFW <3rd %ile. Horgan R; Nehme L; Jensen HJ; Shah AP; Saal R; Onishi K; Kawakita T; Martins JG; Abuhamad A Am J Perinatol; 2024 Jul; 41(9):1120-1125. PubMed ID: 38301725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Defining fetal growth restriction: abdominal circumference as an alternative criterion. Rad S; Beauchamp S; Morales C; Mirocha J; Esakoff TF J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2018 Dec; 31(23):3089-3094. PubMed ID: 28817998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing fetal biometric growth velocity versus estimated fetal weight for prediction of neonatal small for gestational age. Price CR; Roeckner J; Odibo L; Odibo A J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Oct; 35(20):3931-3936. PubMed ID: 33172312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The association between second trimester estimated fetal weight and small for gestational age at birth. Fox NS; Gettenberg G; Stern E; Schwartz JJ; Kim R; Saltzman DH; Rebarber A J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(15):2398-402. PubMed ID: 26381844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic accuracy of individual antenatal tools for prediction of small-for-gestational age at birth. Poljak B; Agarwal U; Jackson R; Alfirevic Z; Sharp A Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 49(4):493-499. PubMed ID: 27486031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing outcomes of fetal growth restriction defined by estimated fetal weight versus isolated abdominal circumference. Griffin MM; Mehta-Lee SS; Penfield CA; Roman AS Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 Jul; 310(1):449-452. PubMed ID: 37891409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of Using Abdominal Circumference Independently in the Diagnosis of Fetal Growth Restriction. Pressman K; Odibo L; Duncan JR; Odibo AO J Ultrasound Med; 2022 Jan; 41(1):157-162. PubMed ID: 33675562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative Diagnostic Performance of Estimated Fetal Weight and Isolated Abdominal Circumference for the Detection of Fetal Growth Restriction. Whitham MD; Reynolds DM; Urban AR; Ennen CS; Dudley DJ J Ultrasound Med; 2023 Feb; 42(2):477-485. PubMed ID: 35502972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by fetal biometry at 30-34 weeks. Bakalis S; Silva M; Akolekar R; Poon LC; Nicolaides KH Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 45(5):551-8. PubMed ID: 25523866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intrauterine growth restriction and oligohydramnios among high-risk patients. Chauhan SP; Taylor M; Shields D; Parker D; Scardo JA; Magann EF Am J Perinatol; 2007 Apr; 24(4):215-21. PubMed ID: 17447191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ultrasound assessment of intrauterine growth restriction: relationship to neonatal body composition. Law TL; Korte JE; Katikaneni LD; Wagner CL; Ebeling MD; Newman RB Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Sep; 205(3):255.e1-6. PubMed ID: 22071054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Customized fetal weight limits for antenatal detection of fetal growth restriction. De Jong CL; Francis A; Van Geijn HP; Gardosi J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jan; 15(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 10776010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of ultrasound to detect small-for-gestational-age infants in patients with elevated human chorionic gonadotropin on maternal serum screening. Hatfield T; Caughey AB; Lagrew DC; Heintz R; Chung JH Am J Perinatol; 2010 Feb; 27(2):173-80. PubMed ID: 19742421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Longitudinal Assessment of Abdominal Circumference versus Estimated Fetal Weight in the Detection of Late Fetal Growth Restriction. Basuki TR; Caradeux J; Eixarch E; Gratacós E; Figueras F Fetal Diagn Ther; 2019; 45(4):230-237. PubMed ID: 29339641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of fundal height measurement and sonographically measured fetal abdominal circumference in the prediction of high and low birth weight at term. Kayem G; Grangé G; Bréart G; Goffinet F Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 34(5):566-71. PubMed ID: 19582801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]