152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16966155)
1. A comparison of different methods to measure the EGG contact quotient.
Herbst C; Ternström S
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2006; 31(3):126-38. PubMed ID: 16966155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using electroglottographic real-time feedback to control posterior glottal adduction during phonation.
Herbst CT; Howard D; Schlömicher-Thier J
J Voice; 2010 Jan; 24(1):72-85. PubMed ID: 19185453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing Chalk With Cheese-The EGG Contact Quotient Is Only a Limited Surrogate of the Closed Quotient.
Herbst CT; Schutte HK; Bowling DL; Svec JG
J Voice; 2017 Jul; 31(4):401-409. PubMed ID: 28017461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Investigation of four distinct glottal configurations in classical singing--a pilot study.
Herbst CT; Ternström S; Svec JG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Mar; 125(3):EL104-9. PubMed ID: 19275279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Membranous and cartilaginous vocal fold adduction in singing.
Herbst CT; Qiu Q; Schutte HK; Švec JG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):2253-62. PubMed ID: 21476680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acoustic and EGG analyses of emotional utterances.
Waaramaa T; Kankare E
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2013 Apr; 38(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 22587654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing closed quotient in children singers' voices as measured by high-speed-imaging, electroglottography, and inverse filtering.
Mecke AC; Sundberg J; Granqvist S; Echternach M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):435-41. PubMed ID: 22280605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electroglottographic contact quotient in different phonation types using different amplitude threshold levels.
Kankare E; Laukkanen AM; Ilomäki I; Miettinen A; Pylkkänen T
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2012 Oct; 37(3):127-32. PubMed ID: 22432606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Variability of electroglottographic glottal closed quotients: necessity of standardization to obtain normative values.
Kania RE; Hans S; Hartl DM; Clement P; Crevier-Buchman L; Brasnu DF
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Mar; 130(3):349-52. PubMed ID: 15023846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Glottal open quotient in singing: measurements and correlation with laryngeal mechanisms, vocal intensity, and fundamental frequency.
Henrich N; D'Alessandro C; Doval B; Castellengo M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Mar; 117(3 Pt 1):1417-30. PubMed ID: 15807029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of gender on measures of electroglottographic contact quotient.
Awan SN; Awan JA
J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):433-40. PubMed ID: 23809567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What do male singers mean by modal and falsetto register? An investigation of the glottal voice source.
Salomão GL; Sundberg J
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2009; 34(2):73-83. PubMed ID: 19363740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contact quotient versus closed quotient: a comparative study on professional male singers.
Lã FM; Sundberg J
J Voice; 2015 Mar; 29(2):148-54. PubMed ID: 25510160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three registers in an untrained female singer analyzed by videokymography, strobolaryngoscopy and sound spectrography.
Svec JG; Sundberg J; Hertegård S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):347-53. PubMed ID: 18177164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Glottal Adduction and Subglottal Pressure in Singing.
Herbst CT; Hess M; Müller F; Švec JG; Sundberg J
J Voice; 2015 Jul; 29(4):391-402. PubMed ID: 25944295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relation between perceived voice register and flow glottogram parameters in males.
Salomão GL; Sundberg J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jul; 124(1):546-51. PubMed ID: 18646997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Vowel effect on glottal parameters and the magnitude of jaw opening.
Lim M; Lin E; Bones P
J Voice; 2006 Mar; 20(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 15941648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An Examination of the Relationship Between Electroglottographic Contact Quotient, Electroglottographic Decontacting Phase Profile, and Acoustical Spectral Moments.
Awan SN; Krauss AR; Herbst CT
J Voice; 2015 Sep; 29(5):519-29. PubMed ID: 25795367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of resonance tubes on glottal contact quotient with and without task instruction: a comparison of trained and untrained voices.
Gaskill CS; Quinney DM
J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):e79-93. PubMed ID: 21550779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High-speed imaging and electroglottography measurements of the open quotient in untrained male voices' register transitions.
Echternach M; Dippold S; Sundberg J; Arndt S; Zander MF; Richter B
J Voice; 2010 Nov; 24(6):644-50. PubMed ID: 20083378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
