These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

484 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16966484)

  • 1. Prostate cancer localization with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging.
    Fütterer JJ; Heijmink SW; Scheenen TW; Veltman J; Huisman HJ; Vos P; Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA; Witjes JA; Krabbe PF; Heerschap A; Barentsz JO
    Radiology; 2006 Nov; 241(2):449-58. PubMed ID: 16966484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Standardized threshold approach using three-dimensional proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging in prostate cancer localization of the entire prostate.
    Fütterer JJ; Scheenen TW; Heijmink SW; Huisman HJ; Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA; Witjes JA; Heerschap A; Barentsz JO
    Invest Radiol; 2007 Feb; 42(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 17220729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prostate cancer localization with endorectal MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging: effect of clinical data on reader accuracy.
    Dhingsa R; Qayyum A; Coakley FV; Lu Y; Jones KD; Swanson MG; Carroll PR; Hricak H; Kurhanewicz J
    Radiology; 2004 Jan; 230(1):215-20. PubMed ID: 14695396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transition zone prostate cancer: detection and localization with 3-T multiparametric MR imaging.
    Hoeks CM; Hambrock T; Yakar D; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Feuth T; Witjes JA; Fütterer JJ; Barentsz JO
    Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):207-17. PubMed ID: 23143029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prostate cancer: identification with combined diffusion-weighted MR imaging and 3D 1H MR spectroscopic imaging--correlation with pathologic findings.
    Mazaheri Y; Shukla-Dave A; Hricak H; Fine SW; Zhang J; Inurrigarro G; Moskowitz CS; Ishill NM; Reuter VE; Touijer K; Zakian KL; Koutcher JA
    Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):480-8. PubMed ID: 18227542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prostate depiction at endorectal MR spectroscopic imaging: investigation of a standardized evaluation system.
    Jung JA; Coakley FV; Vigneron DB; Swanson MG; Qayyum A; Weinberg V; Jones KD; Carroll PR; Kurhanewicz J
    Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):701-8. PubMed ID: 15564406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peripheral zone prostate cancer localization by multiparametric magnetic resonance at 3 T: unbiased cancer identification by matching to histopathology.
    Selnæs KM; Heerschap A; Jensen LR; Tessem MB; Schweder GJ; Goa PE; Viset T; Angelsen A; Gribbestad IS
    Invest Radiol; 2012 Nov; 47(11):624-33. PubMed ID: 23011187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peripheral zone prostate cancer: accuracy of different interpretative approaches with MR and MR spectroscopic imaging.
    Westphalen AC; Coakley FV; Qayyum A; Swanson M; Simko JP; Lu Y; Zhao S; Carroll PR; Yeh BM; Kurhanewicz J
    Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):177-84. PubMed ID: 18024434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Discrimination of prostate cancer from normal peripheral zone and central gland tissue by using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
    Engelbrecht MR; Huisman HJ; Laheij RJ; Jager GJ; van Leenders GJ; Hulsbergen-Van De Kaa CA; de la Rosette JJ; Blickman JG; Barentsz JO
    Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):248-54. PubMed ID: 12944607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional dynamic susceptibility-weighted perfusion MR imaging at 3.0 T: feasibility and contrast agent dose.
    Manka C; Träber F; Gieseke J; Schild HH; Kuhl CK
    Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):869-77. PubMed ID: 15665227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prostate cancer: body-array versus endorectal coil MR imaging at 3 T--comparison of image quality, localization, and staging performance.
    Heijmink SW; Fütterer JJ; Hambrock T; Takahashi S; Scheenen TW; Huisman HJ; Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA; Knipscheer BC; Kiemeney LA; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):184-95. PubMed ID: 17495178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer: diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted 3.0-T MR imaging--initial experience.
    Lin G; Ng KK; Chang CJ; Wang JJ; Ho KC; Yen TC; Wu TI; Wang CC; Chen YR; Huang YT; Ng SH; Jung SM; Chang TC; Lai CH
    Radiology; 2009 Mar; 250(3):784-92. PubMed ID: 19244045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prostate cancer: relationships between postbiopsy hemorrhage and tumor detectability at MR diagnosis.
    Tamada T; Sone T; Jo Y; Yamamoto A; Yamashita T; Egashira N; Imai S; Fukunaga M
    Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):531-9. PubMed ID: 18539890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection of prostate cancer with magnetic resonance imaging: optimization of T1-weighted, T2-weighted, dynamic-enhanced T1-weighted, diffusion-weighted imaging apparent diffusion coefficient mapping sequences and MR spectroscopy, correlated with biopsy and histopathological findings.
    Aydin H; Kizilgöz V; Tatar IG; Damar C; Ugan AR; Paker I; Hekimoğlu B
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(1):30-45. PubMed ID: 22261768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prostate cancer detection: comparison of T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging, and the three techniques combined.
    Chen M; Dang HD; Wang JY; Zhou C; Li SY; Wang WC; Zhao WF; Yang ZH; Zhong CY; Li GZ
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jun; 49(5):602-10. PubMed ID: 18568549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prostate cancer: apparent diffusion coefficient map with T2-weighted images for detection--a multireader study.
    Lim HK; Kim JK; Kim KA; Cho KS
    Radiology; 2009 Jan; 250(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 19017927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MRI techniques for prediction of local tumor progression after high-intensity focused ultrasonic ablation of prostate cancer.
    Kim CK; Park BK; Lee HM; Kim SS; Kim E
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 May; 190(5):1180-6. PubMed ID: 18430829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. T2-weighted MR imaging in the assessment of cirrhotic liver.
    Hussain HK; Syed I; Nghiem HV; Johnson TD; Carlos RC; Weadock WJ; Francis IR
    Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):637-44. PubMed ID: 14739306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rectal cancer: MR imaging in local staging--is gadolinium-based contrast material helpful?
    Vliegen RF; Beets GL; von Meyenfeldt MF; Kessels AG; Lemaire EE; van Engelshoven JM; Beets-Tan RG
    Radiology; 2005 Jan; 234(1):179-88. PubMed ID: 15550372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Staging prostate cancer with dynamic contrast-enhanced endorectal MR imaging prior to radical prostatectomy: experienced versus less experienced readers.
    Fütterer JJ; Engelbrecht MR; Huisman HJ; Jager GJ; Hulsbergen-van De Kaa CA; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO
    Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):541-9. PubMed ID: 16244263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.