225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16966904)
1. Bacterial plaque colonization around dental implant surfaces.
Covani U; Marconcini S; Crespi R; Barone A
Implant Dent; 2006 Sep; 15(3):298-304. PubMed ID: 16966904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Design features that may influence bacterial plaque retention: a retrospective analysis of failed implants.
O'Mahony A; MacNeill SR; Cobb CM
Quintessence Int; 2000 Apr; 31(4):249-56. PubMed ID: 11203932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biofilm on dental implants: a review of the literature.
Subramani K; Jung RE; Molenberg A; Hammerle CH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):616-26. PubMed ID: 19885401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The peri-implant sulcus compared with internal implant and suprastructure components: a microbiological analysis.
Cosyn J; Van Aelst L; Collaert B; Persson GR; De Bruyn H
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Dec; 13(4):286-95. PubMed ID: 19673920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A 16-year study of the microgap between 272 human titanium implants and their abutments.
Scarano A; Assenza B; Piattelli M; Iezzi G; Leghissa GC; Quaranta A; Tortora P; Piattelli A
J Oral Implantol; 2005; 31(6):269-75. PubMed ID: 16447899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fluids and microbial penetration in the internal part of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-abutment connections.
Piattelli A; Scarano A; Paolantonio M; Assenza B; Leghissa GC; Di Bonaventura G; Catamo G; Piccolomini R
J Periodontol; 2001 Sep; 72(9):1146-50. PubMed ID: 11577944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tissue reactions, fluids, and bacterial infiltration in implants retrieved at autopsy: a case report.
Orsini G; Fanali S; Scarano A; Petrone G; di Silvestro S; Piattelli A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(2):283-6. PubMed ID: 10795463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of repeated screw tightening on bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface.
do Nascimento C; Pedrazzi V; Miani PK; Moreira LD; de Albuquerque RF
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Dec; 20(12):1394-7. PubMed ID: 19709063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Porous titanium granules used as osteoconductive material for sinus floor augmentation: a clinical pilot study.
Bystedt H; Rasmusson L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Jun; 11(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 18657154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bacterial colonization of the implant-abutment interface using an in vitro dynamic loading model.
Koutouzis T; Wallet S; Calderon N; Lundgren T
J Periodontol; 2011 Apr; 82(4):613-8. PubMed ID: 21043798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of titanium abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and gingivitis: short-term observations.
Quirynen M; Bollen CM; Papaioannou W; Van Eldere J; van Steenberghe D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 8666447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface of premachined or cast components.
do Nascimento C; Barbosa RE; Issa JP; Watanabe E; Ito IY; Albuquerque RF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Feb; 37(2):177-80. PubMed ID: 17931833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Peri-implant bone level around implants with platform-switched abutments: preliminary data from a prospective study.
Hürzeler M; Fickl S; Zuhr O; Wachtel HC
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jul; 65(7 Suppl 1):33-9. PubMed ID: 17586347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bacterial colonization of the dental implant fixture-abutment interface: an in vitro study.
Tesmer M; Wallet S; Koutouzis T; Lundgren T
J Periodontol; 2009 Dec; 80(12):1991-7. PubMed ID: 19961382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of the bone response around a hydroxyapatite-coated implant retrieved after 15 years.
Iezzi G; Orlandi S; Pecora G; Piattelli A
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2009 Feb; 29(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 19244887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bacterial colonisation of interior implant threads with and without sealing.
Proff P; Steinmetz I; Bayerlein T; Dietze S; Fanghänel J; Gedrange T
Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2006 Feb; 65(1):75-7. PubMed ID: 16783744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rapid bone resorption adjacent to hydroxyapatite-coated implants.
Ichikawa T; Hirota K; Kanitani H; Wigianto R; Kawamoto N; Matsumoto N; Miyake Y
J Oral Implantol; 1996; 22(3-4):232-5. PubMed ID: 9524500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bacterial colonization immediately after installation on oral titanium implants.
Fürst MM; Salvi GE; Lang NP; Persson GR
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Aug; 18(4):501-8. PubMed ID: 17501978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A long-term retrospective study of two different implant surfaces placed after reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla using Le Fort I osteotomy and interpositional bone grafting.
Marchetti C; Pieri F; Corinaldesi G; Degidi M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(5):911-8. PubMed ID: 19014162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro evaluation of the implant-abutment bacterial seal: the locking taper system.
Dibart S; Warbington M; Su MF; Skobe Z
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(5):732-7. PubMed ID: 16274147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
