These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16967209)

  • 1. Predicting water quality impaired stream segments using landscape-scale data and a regional geostatistical model: a case study in Maryland.
    Peterson EE; Urquhart NS
    Environ Monit Assess; 2006 Oct; 121(1-3):615-38. PubMed ID: 16967209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patterns of spatial autocorrelation in stream water chemistry.
    Peterson EE; Merton AA; Theobald DM; Urquhart NS
    Environ Monit Assess; 2006 Oct; 121(1-3):571-96. PubMed ID: 16897525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Wetland types and wetland maps differ in ability to predict dissolved organic carbon concentrations in streams.
    Johnston CA; Shmagin BA; Frost PC; Cherrier C; Larson JH; Lamberti GA; Bridgham SD
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Oct; 404(2-3):326-34. PubMed ID: 18054999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A hydrologic network supporting spatially referenced regression modeling in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
    Brakebill JW; Preston SD
    Environ Monit Assess; 2003; 81(1-3):73-84. PubMed ID: 12620006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Watershed-based survey designs.
    Detenbeck NE; Cincotta D; Denver JM; Greenlee SK; Olsen AR; Pitchford AM
    Environ Monit Assess; 2005 Apr; 103(1-3):59-81. PubMed ID: 15861987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial-scale effects on relative importance of physical habitat predictors of stream health.
    Frimpong EA; Sutton TM; Engel BA; Simon TP
    Environ Manage; 2005 Dec; 36(6):899-917. PubMed ID: 16261278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. GIS-based spatial regression and prediction of water quality in river networks: a case study in Iowa.
    Yang X; Jin W
    J Environ Manage; 2010 Oct; 91(10):1943-51. PubMed ID: 20570037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Longitudinal variability in streamwater chemistry and carbon and nitrogen fluxes in restored and degraded urban stream networks.
    Sivirichi GM; Kaushal SS; Mayer PM; Welty C; Belt KT; Newcomer TA; Newcomb KD; Grese MM
    J Environ Monit; 2011 Feb; 13(2):288-303. PubMed ID: 21116542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Groundtruthing and potential for predicting acid deposition impacts in headwater streams using bedrock geology, GIS, angling, and stream chemistry.
    Kirby CS; McInerney B; Turner MD
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Apr; 393(2-3):249-61. PubMed ID: 18258282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
    Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dissolved organic carbon in streams within a subarctic catchment analysed using a GIS/remote sensing approach.
    Mzobe P; Berggren M; Pilesjö P; Lundin E; Olefeldt D; Roulet NT; Persson A
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0199608. PubMed ID: 29979688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predicting Redox Conditions in Groundwater at a Regional Scale.
    Tesoriero AJ; Terziotti S; Abrams DB
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Aug; 49(16):9657-64. PubMed ID: 26230618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Landscape control of stream water aluminum in a boreal catchment during spring flood.
    Cory N; Buffam I; Laudon H; Köhler S; Bishop K
    Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Jun; 40(11):3494-500. PubMed ID: 16786685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A graphical screening method for assessing stream water quality using specific conductivity and alkalinity data.
    Kney AD; Brandes D
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Mar; 82(4):519-28. PubMed ID: 16618530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of the probability-based Maryland Biological Stream Survey to the state's assessment of water quality standards.
    Southerland MT; Vølstad JH; Weber ED; Klauda RJ; Poukish CA; Rowe MC
    Environ Monit Assess; 2009 Mar; 150(1-4):65-73. PubMed ID: 19067199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative evaluation of runoff and water quality using HSPF and SWMM.
    Lee SB; Yoon CG; Jung KW; Hwang HS
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(6):1401-9. PubMed ID: 20861556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Applications of fluorescence spectroscopy for predicting percent wastewater in an urban stream.
    Goldman JH; Rounds SA; Needoba JA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Apr; 46(8):4374-81. PubMed ID: 22435681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A mixed-model moving-average approach to geostatistical modeling in stream networks.
    Peterson EE; Ver Hoef JM
    Ecology; 2010 Mar; 91(3):644-51. PubMed ID: 20426324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relating nutrient and herbicide fate with landscape features and characteristics of 15 subwatersheds in the Choptank River watershed.
    Hively WD; Hapeman CJ; McConnell LL; Fisher TR; Rice CP; McCarty GW; Sadeghi AM; Whitall DR; Downey PM; Niño de Guzmán GT; Bialek-Kalinski K; Lang MW; Gustafson AB; Sutton AJ; Sefton KA; Harman Fetcho JA
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Sep; 409(19):3866-78. PubMed ID: 21733565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Delineation and evaluation of hydrologic-landscape regions in the United States using geographic information system tools and multivariate statistical analyses.
    Wolock DM; Winter TC; McMahon G
    Environ Manage; 2004; 34 Suppl 1():S71-88. PubMed ID: 16044554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.