235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16967256)
21. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging can be used in place of positron emission tomography for N staging of non-small cell lung cancer with fewer false-positive results.
Nomori H; Mori T; Ikeda K; Kawanaka K; Shiraishi S; Katahira K; Yamashita Y
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Apr; 135(4):816-22. PubMed ID: 18374761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Magnetic resonance imaging in oncology: an overview.
Wallis F; Gilbert FJ
J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1999 Apr; 44(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 10230207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Newer imaging modalities to assist with target localization in the radiation treatment of prostate cancer and possible lymph node metastases.
John SS; Zietman AL; Shipley WU; Harisinghani MG
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008; 71(1 Suppl):S43-7. PubMed ID: 18406936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Liver metastases from colorectal cancer: imaging with superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-enhanced MR imaging, computed tomography and positron emission tomography.
Rappeport ED; Loft A
Abdom Imaging; 2007; 32(5):624-34. PubMed ID: 17710359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Optimization of imaging technics in the study of tumors of the pharynx, larynx and oral cavity].
Henrot P; Stines J; Walter F; Pierucci F; Troufléau P; Blum A; Roland J
J Radiol; 1999 Feb; 80(2 Suppl):233-50. PubMed ID: 10209720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [Pretreatment diagnostic evaluation of cervical cancer].
Lemke U; Hamm B
Rofo; 2009 May; 181(5):433-40. PubMed ID: 19373746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Magnetic resonance imaging and positron-emission tomography imaging in the 21st century as tools for the evaluation and management of patients with invasive cervical carcinoma.
Wolfson AH
Semin Radiat Oncol; 2006 Jul; 16(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 16814160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Diagnostic imaging of osteosarcoma.
Seeger LL; Gold RH; Chandnani VP
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Sep; (270):254-63. PubMed ID: 1884547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Utility of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the preoperative staging of squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx.
Kim MR; Roh JL; Kim JS; Lee JH; Cho KJ; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2007 Jun; 33(5):633-8. PubMed ID: 17391904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Diagnostic imaging of cancer].
Rasmussen F; Højgaard L; Kronborg O
Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 May; 164(22):2901-12. PubMed ID: 12082819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. New directions in head and neck imaging.
Shah GV; Wesolowski JR; Ansari SA; Mukherji SK
J Surg Oncol; 2008 Jun; 97(8):644-8. PubMed ID: 18493943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Lymphotrophic nanoparticle enhanced MR imaging (LNMRI) for lymph node imaging.
Saokar A; Braschi M; Harisinghani M
Abdom Imaging; 2006; 31(6):660-7. PubMed ID: 16680506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Radiologic evaluation of larynx cancer.
Blitz AM; Aygun N
Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 2008 Aug; 41(4):697-713, vi. PubMed ID: 18570954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of whole-body PET/CT, dedicated high-resolution head and neck PET/CT, and contrast-enhanced CT in preoperative staging of clinically M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
Rodrigues RS; Bozza FA; Christian PE; Hoffman JM; Butterfield RI; Christensen CR; Heilbrun M; Wiggins RH; Hunt JP; Bentz BG; Hitchcock YJ; Morton KA
J Nucl Med; 2009 Aug; 50(8):1205-13. PubMed ID: 19617339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The role of integrated computed tomography positron-emission tomography in esophageal cancer: staging and assessment of therapeutic response.
Erasmus JJ; Munden RF
Semin Radiat Oncol; 2007 Jan; 17(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 17185195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Synergistically integrated nanoparticles as multimodal probes for nanobiotechnology.
Cheon J; Lee JH
Acc Chem Res; 2008 Dec; 41(12):1630-40. PubMed ID: 18698851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Non invasive methods in competition for EUS (US, CE-US, CT, MRI and PET/CT): the radiologist point of view].
Martina MC; Cassinis MC; Tappero C; Gandini G
Minerva Med; 2007 Aug; 98(4):343-50. PubMed ID: 17921948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Current concepts in lymph node imaging.
Torabi M; Aquino SL; Harisinghani MG
J Nucl Med; 2004 Sep; 45(9):1509-18. PubMed ID: 15347718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison between 3-T magnetic resonance imaging and multi-detector row computed tomography for the preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer.
Kim CK; Kim SH; Choi D; Kim MJ; Chun HK; Lee SJ; Lee JM
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(6):853-9. PubMed ID: 18043346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. CT, MRI, PET, PET/CT, and ultrasound in the evaluation of obstetric and gynecologic patients.
Gjelsteen AC; Ching BH; Meyermann MW; Prager DA; Murphy TF; Berkey BD; Mitchell LA
Surg Clin North Am; 2008 Apr; 88(2):361-90, vii. PubMed ID: 18381118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
