These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16967409)
1. Method comparison in the clinical laboratory. Jensen AL; Kjelgaard-Hansen M Vet Clin Pathol; 2006 Sep; 35(3):276-86. PubMed ID: 16967409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. ASVCP guidelines: allowable total error guidelines for biochemistry. Harr KE; Flatland B; Nabity M; Freeman KP; Vet Clin Pathol; 2013 Dec; 42(4):424-36. PubMed ID: 24320779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reference intervals: an essential, expanding, and occasionally equivocal standard. Friedrichs KR Vet Clin Pathol; 2010 Jun; 39(2):131-2. PubMed ID: 20624261 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Internal quality control of a turbidimetric immunoassay for canine serum C-reactive protein based on pooled patient samples. Kjelgaard-Hansen M; Jensen AL; Kristensen AT Vet Clin Pathol; 2004; 33(3):139-44. PubMed ID: 15334348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How much reproducibility do we need in human and veterinary pathology? Pospischil A; Folkers G Exp Toxicol Pathol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 25483119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Discordance rate, a new concept for combining diagnostic decisions with analytical performance characteristics. 1. Application in method or sample system comparisons and in defining decision limits. Haeckel R; Wosniok W; Puentmann I Clin Chem Lab Med; 2003 Mar; 41(3):347-55. PubMed ID: 12705345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Introduction: Clinical pathology and hematology. Gilor C; Gilor S Top Companion Anim Med; 2011 May; 26(2):43-4. PubMed ID: 21596343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Subjectivity in defining quality specifications for quality control and test validation. Kjelgaard-Hansen M; Jensen AL Vet Clin Pathol; 2010 Jun; 39(2):134-5. PubMed ID: 20624264 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The preanalytic phase in veterinary clinical pathology. Braun JP; Bourgès-Abella N; Geffré A; Concordet D; Trumel C Vet Clin Pathol; 2015 Mar; 44(1):8-25. PubMed ID: 25438659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recognizing and Reducing Analytical Errors and Sources of Variation in Clinical Pathology Data in Safety Assessment Studies. Schultze AE; Irizarry AR Toxicol Pathol; 2017 Feb; 45(2):281-287. PubMed ID: 28178899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of cytology as a diagnostic method in veterinary practice and assessment of communication between veterinary practitioners and veterinary clinical pathologists. Christopher MM; Hotz CS; Shelly SM; Pion PD J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2008 Mar; 232(5):747-54. PubMed ID: 18312185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differentiating between analytical and diagnostic performance evaluation with a focus on the method comparison study and identification of bias. Flatland B; Friedrichs KR; Klenner S Vet Clin Pathol; 2014 Dec; 43(4):475-86. PubMed ID: 25257670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Verification/validation of the performances of analytical method]. Vassault A; Hulin A; Chapuzet E; Arnaud J; Giroud C; Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2010 Dec; 68 Spec No 1():247-94. PubMed ID: 21613021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pathology Harmony; a pragmatic and scientific approach to unfounded variation in the clinical laboratory. Berg J; Lane V Ann Clin Biochem; 2011 May; 48(Pt 3):195-7. PubMed ID: 21555538 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of hemostasis and coagulation assays: recommendations and guidelines. Marlar RA; Gausman JN; Engel JW Semin Thromb Hemost; 2014 Mar; 40(2):186-94. PubMed ID: 24497118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The application of theoretical goals based on biological variation data in proficiency testing. Fraser CG Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):404-15. PubMed ID: 3355342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reference Value Advisor: a new freeware set of macroinstructions to calculate reference intervals with Microsoft Excel. Geffré A; Concordet D; Braun JP; Trumel C Vet Clin Pathol; 2011 Mar; 40(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 21366659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Best practices for veterinary toxicologic clinical pathology, with emphasis on the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. Tomlinson L; Boone LI; Ramaiah L; Penraat KA; von Beust BR; Ameri M; Poitout-Belissent FM; Weingand K; Workman HC; Aulbach AD; Meyer DJ; Brown DE; MacNeill AL; Bolliger AP; Bounous DI Vet Clin Pathol; 2013 Sep; 42(3):252-69. PubMed ID: 23889060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Setting performance goals and evaluating total analytical error for diagnostic assays. Krouwer JS Clin Chem; 2002 Jun; 48(6 Pt 1):919-27. PubMed ID: 12029009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The quality of veterinary in-clinic and reference laboratory biochemical testing. Rishniw M; Pion PD; Maher T Vet Clin Pathol; 2012 Mar; 41(1):92-109. PubMed ID: 22250729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]