310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16967412)
1. Comparison of white blood cell differential percentages determined by the in-house LaserCyte hematology analyzer and a manual method.
Papasouliotis K; Cue S; Crawford E; Pinches M; Dumont M; Burley K
Vet Clin Pathol; 2006 Sep; 35(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 16967412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Precision and accuracy of the Mindray BC-5000Vet hematology analyzer for canine and feline blood.
Thongsahuan S; Fonghoi L; Kaewfai S; Srinoun K
Vet Clin Pathol; 2020 Jun; 49(2):207-216. PubMed ID: 32524640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of a point-of-care hematology analyzer for use in dogs and cats receiving chemotherapeutic treatment.
Lara-Garcia A; Hosoya K; Iazbik C; Westendorf N; Gallant S; Couto G
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2008 May; 232(10):1488-95. PubMed ID: 18479238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the automated hematology analyzer Sysmex XT-2000iV ™ compared to the ADVIA ® 2120 for its use in dogs, cats, and horses. Part II: Accuracy of leukocyte differential and reticulocyte count, impact of anticoagulant and sample aging.
Bauer N; Nakagawa J; Dunker C; Failing K; Moritz A
J Vet Diagn Invest; 2012 Jan; 24(1):74-89. PubMed ID: 22362937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of canine and feline leukocyte differential counts obtained with the scil vCell 5 compared to the Advia 2120 hematology analyzer and a manual method.
Zelmer KC; Moritz A; Bauer N
J Vet Diagn Invest; 2023 Nov; 35(6):679-697. PubMed ID: 37612877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of the Celltac alpha automated hematology analyzer for canine and feline blood samples.
McDaniel BJ; Hirschberger J; Weber K
Vet Clin Pathol; 2013 Mar; 42(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 23278503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the impedance analyzer PocH-100iV Diff for analysis of canine and feline blood.
Bauer NB; Nakagawa J; Dunker C; Failing K; Moritz A
Vet Clin Pathol; 2012 Jun; 41(2):194-206. PubMed ID: 22324888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of donkey hemogram using the LaserCyte hematology analyzer, an impedance system, and a manual method.
Perez-Ecija A; Gonzalez-De Cara CA; Aguilera-Aguilera R; Estepa JC; Rubio MD; Mendoza FJ
Vet Clin Pathol; 2014 Dec; 43(4):525-37. PubMed ID: 25070774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of the Sysmex XT-2000iV hematology system for dogs, cats, and horses. II. Differential leukocyte counts.
Lilliehöök I; Tvedten H
Vet Clin Pathol; 2009 Jun; 38(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 19392762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the Mythic 18 hematology analyzer for use with canine, feline, and equine samples.
Wassmuth AK; Riond B; Hofmann-Lehmann R; Lutz H
J Vet Diagn Invest; 2011 May; 23(3):436-53. PubMed ID: 21908272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison study between the results of the Siemens ADVIA 120 analyzer and the manual method for differential leukocyte counts in sheep.
Oikonomidis IL; Brozos C; Kiossis E; Tsouloufi TK; Kritsepi-Konstantinou M
Vet Clin Pathol; 2021 Jun; 50(2):203-208. PubMed ID: 33813770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance evaluation of the Sysmex pocH-100iV Diff hematology analyzer for analysis of canine, feline, equine, and bovine blood.
Riond B; Weissenbacher S; Hofmann-Lehmann R; Lutz H
Vet Clin Pathol; 2011 Dec; 40(4):484-495. PubMed ID: 22092369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Canine complete blood counts: a comparison of four in-office instruments with the ADVIA 120 and manual differential counts.
Welles EG; Hall AS; Carpenter DM
Vet Clin Pathol; 2009 Mar; 38(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 19228360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating Atlantic bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) leukocyte differential counts comparing the CellaVision DM96 and the manual method.
Zaias J; Bradley C; Richardson J; Eskelinen HC; Ikpatt F; Cray C
Vet Clin Pathol; 2017 Sep; 46(3):466-470. PubMed ID: 28598511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical evaluation of the CA530-VET hematology analyzer for use in veterinary practice.
Roleff S; Arndt G; Bottema B; Junker L; Grabner A; Kohn B
Vet Clin Pathol; 2007 Jun; 36(2):155-66. PubMed ID: 17523089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feline Differential Leukocyte Count with ProCyte Dx: Frequency and Severity of a Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Error and How to Avoid It.
Tvedten HW; Andersson V; Lilliehöök IE
J Vet Intern Med; 2017 Nov; 31(6):1708-1716. PubMed ID: 28862354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Errors in basophil enumeration with 3 veterinary hematology systems and observations on occurrence of basophils in dogs.
Lilliehöök I; Tvedten HW
Vet Clin Pathol; 2011 Dec; 40(4):450-458. PubMed ID: 22092582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of an in-house centrifugal hematology analyzer for use in veterinary practice.
Bienzle D; Stanton JB; Embry JM; Bush SE; Mahaffey EA
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2000 Oct; 217(8):1195-200. PubMed ID: 11043692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Japanese Society for Laboratory Hematology flow cytometric reference method of determining the differential leukocyte count: external quality assurance using fresh blood samples.
Kawai Y; Nagai Y; Ogawa E; Kondo H
Int J Lab Hematol; 2017 Apr; 39(2):202-222. PubMed ID: 28013527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the Beckman Coulter AcT 5 diff AL hematology analyzer in a hospital setting.
Bhuta UM; Ulstein H
Lab Hematol; 2003; 9(3):167-74. PubMed ID: 14521325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
