215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16967523)
1. Readers' and author's responses to "are traditional peer-reviewed medical articles obsolete?".
Goldstone RA
MedGenMed; 2006; 8(1):70; author reply 70. PubMed ID: 16967523
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Readers' and author's responses to "are traditional peer-reviewed medical articles obsolete?".
Ward JA
MedGenMed; 2006; 8(1):70. PubMed ID: 16967524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Readers' and author's responses to "are traditional peer-reviewed medical articles obsolete?".
Giustini D
MedGenMed; 2006; 8(1):70. PubMed ID: 16967522
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Readers' and author's responses to "are traditional peer-reviewed medical articles obsolete?".
Goodman MJ
MedGenMed; 2006 Mar; 8(1):70; author reply 70. PubMed ID: 16915200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Are traditional peer-reviewed medical articles obsolete?
Frishauf P
MedGenMed; 2006 Jan; 8(1):5. PubMed ID: 16915135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Making sure corrections don't vanish online.
Shim EH; Parekh V
Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7029):18; discussion 18. PubMed ID: 15744271
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact factors: a tool of the sterile audit culture.
Tuck A
Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6944):14. PubMed ID: 12840730
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Open access mandate threatens dissemination of scientific information.
McMullan E
J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 18347464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comments on European Medical Writers Association (EMWA) guidelines on the role of medical writers in developing peer-reviewed publications.
Foote M; Hamilton CW; Mallia-Hughes M
Curr Med Res Opin; 2005 May; 21(5):703-4; author reply 704. PubMed ID: 15969869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. HIV denialists will exploit any journal's tolerance.
Moore JP
Nature; 2004 Feb; 427(6977):777. PubMed ID: 14985731
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Critics blast 'premature' paper on adult stem cells.
Schiermeier Q; Leeb M
Nature; 2004 Jun; 429(6992):590. PubMed ID: 15190319
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Effectiveness of a reference accuracy strategy for peer-reviewed journal articles.
Speck KE; St Pierre Schneider B
Nurse Educ; 2013; 38(6):265-8. PubMed ID: 24157676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The crisis in scholarly publishing: open access to the rescue?
Oren GA
J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 18347450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Paranoid about peer review?
Rumjanek FD
Nature; 1996 Dec; 384(6609):509. PubMed ID: 8955262
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Integrity of the peer review process.
Smith ER
Can J Cardiol; 2000 Jun; 16(6):814. PubMed ID: 10863172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Ensuring the quality of peer-review process.
Afifi M
Saudi Med J; 2006 Aug; 27(8):1253. PubMed ID: 16883466
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Some rules for writing medical articles for peer-reviewed journals.
Shah J
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2015 May; 97(4):252-4. PubMed ID: 26263929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Expanding access to published research: open access and self-archiving.
Mower A; Youngkin ME
J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 18347463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Peer review: "a critique of the critics".
Andersson KE
J Urol; 2011 Sep; 186(3):777-8. PubMed ID: 21788036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Peer review.
Wechsler AS; Fried PW
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2003 Dec; 126(6):1681-2. PubMed ID: 14688670
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
